Active clinical trials for "Hernia"

The purpose of this prospective paper is to make a comparison between laparoscopic and opening approaches in ventral hernia repair, taking into account absence of recurrence in long - time (5 years), results centered at patient, especially satisfaction with expectations and improvement of normal physical activity, morbidity that particular form must include chronic pain, adjusted mortality through co-morbidities and, finally, prospective expenses, related to both effectiveness and utility

The aim of this study is to compare two levels (high and low forces) of short term lumbar traction on pain and functional tests of the lower limbs in a specific population of patients presenting with acute lumbar sciatica secondary to disc herniation. The investigators hypothesize that, in this particular medical condition, high level of lumbar traction might be more effective than low level lumbar traction in decreasing the pain associated with acute sciatica.

Large abdominal wall hernias are surgically challenging to repair and often associated with significant postoperative complications. Risk factors associated with surgical site complications, such as infection and wound dehiscence, include obesity, diabetes, and smoking. In these high risk patients, the placement of synthetic mesh increases the risk of mesh infection, enterocutaneous fistula formation, and mesh explantation. One of the larger studies of risk factors associated with mesh explantation demonstrated concomitant intra-abdominal procedures have a greater than 6-fold increased hazard of subsequent mesh explantation. As an alternative to synthetic meshes, bioprosthetic meshes derived from the decellularization and processing of allogeneic or xenogeneic tissue sources have been introduced that can often allow the surgeon to treat the surgical site occurrences and salvage the repair without required mesh explantation. Low rates of mesh infection and explantation have been reported for bioprosthetic meshes and are recommended in these complicated patients by the Ventral Hernia Working Group, based on the best available clinical evidence. Despite widespread use of bioprosthetic mesh, there continues to be concern for complications associated with their use (i.e. high seroma and recurrence rates, etc.). This has led to the modification of these matrices by several industry leaders (Acelity, Cook, Integra, etc.) to include a fenestrated platform to allow for fluid to flow through the matrix upon implantation while supporting regeneration in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. To our knowledge, there are no clinical studies prospectively evaluating the long term clinical outcomes for abdominal wall reconstruction procedures involving fenestrated macropourous biologic matrices.This macroporous technology allows for tissue revascularization and integration of the biologic graft and thus an expected improvement in overall outcome. Bioprosthetic fenestrated materials such as Surgimend MP® were developed to assist with earlier incorporation and vascularization of the biologic graft while providing reinforcement of hernia repair. However, there is an absence of high quality prospective data regarding the use of these materials in complicated abdominal wall reconstruction, and no comparative data exists. This study is a prospective, case series study evaluating the efficacy and performance of SurgiMend MP® during complex ventral hernia repairs. This case series involves a biologically derived hernia mesh under its cleared FDA indication for hernia repair. Efficacy will be determined by quantifying surgical complications, hernia recurrence, and cost effectiveness endpoints.

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgeries, with more than 20 million performed globally each year. It is estimated that approximately 15% of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair will experience persistent post-surgical pain that could last months to years. Evidence from related procedures indicates that better surgical preparation through pre-operative exercise and education (i.e. Prehabilitation) followed by ongoing post-surgical rehabilitation leads to more rapid recovery, return to activities and lower likelihood of persistent post-surgical pain. The investigators will determine the feasibility of a peri-operative rehabilitation program (pre- and post-surgery) and our study protocol for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair surgery. The investigators hypothesize that: 1) our peri-operative intervention will be feasible and safe to undertake within a clinical setting; 2) adequate numbers will be enrolled to justify a larger trial; and that 3) our outcome measurement protocol will provide meaningful information with high response rate and low attrition after 3 months.

A double-blind, randomized controlled study is designed to assess the analgesic effect of a single intravenous dose of 2 g of magnesium dipyrone (metamizol) and whether the administration of the active drug will be associated with changes in plasma beta-endorphin immunoreactivity values in patients undergoing elective inguinal herniorrhaphy (Bassini operation) under epidural anesthesia. Participants, care givers, and those assessing the outcomes will be blinded to group assignment. Participants will be randomized to receive dipyrone or a placebo. The active drug or placebo will be administered as an intravenous infusion over 10 min. Pain will be evaluated by the patient according to a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Assessments will be carried out the day before surgery, immediately after operation, at the time of drug administration, and 60 and 180 min after treatment. At the same time as pain will be evaluated, blood samples will be drawn for plasma beta-endorphin immunoreactivity measurement (immunoradiometric assay).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate three dose levels of SKY0402 compared with 105 mg of bupivacaine HCl.

This study evaluates the compare the effects of ultrasound guided TAP block, local anesthetic infiltration to the incision line and intravenous dexketoprofen on postoperative analgesic efficacy and rescue tramadol consumption in inguinal hernia repairs.

Phase I/II, randomized, double-blind, comparator-controlled, dose-escalation study to assess the safety, PK, and efficacy of single postsurgical application of TLC590 compared with Naropin®

The main objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and performance of the AutoLap system in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy procedures.

Proflex® Mesh (partially absorbable mesh, Korea) and Marlex® Mesh (heavyweight mesh) will be used for inguinal hernia repair to compare the safety and efficacy (pain score, quality of life)of two devices at 3 months follow-up.