Active clinical trials for "Hip Fractures"

Hip fractures are common in our elderly population and is associated with pain before and after surgery. The current pain management for patients who have undergone surgery for hip fractures include a combination of oral painkillers, opioids (eg morphine) and regional anaesthesia techniques, which involves the injection of local anaesthetic drugs near nerves supplying the hip joint to numb the operation site. As opioids have many side effects, especially in the elderly patients, regional anaesthesia techniques can help to reduce the use of opioids and the related side effects. This may enhance their recovery and length of hospital stay

This pilot project will address the gaps in knowledge regarding the effect of anesthetic technique on the risk of delirium through an adequately-powered trial employing standardized regimens for treatment and outcome assessment to test the hypothesis that use of spinal versus general anesthesia decreases the risk of delirium after hip fracture surgery.

Post operative delirium is common after hip fracture surgery and is associated with increased length of hospital stay, delayed recovery and increased mortality. Postoperative delirium can also decrease a patient's quality of life and increase treatment costs. Anesthesia and pain relief (analgesia) treatments may also influence the incidence of delirium, but more research is needed into which techniques are effective in improving patient outcomes, care and decreasing costs. This pilot study compares the addition of regional analgesia as part of general anesthesia to determine the incidence of delirium following hip surgery. This is a collaborative study involving anesthesia, orthopedic surgery and geriatrics in the improvement of patient care.

Hip fractures are a significant problem for healthcare providers due to the increasing incidence of fractures in an ageing population. Hip fracture is the most frequent fracture for people over 80 years of age and the second most frequent for those over 65 years. It is projected that by 2051, 23% of the Australian population will be older than 65 and the number of hip fractures will rise fourfold (17,000 in 2004, to 60,000 in 2051). Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines regarding management of hip fracture were published in the Medical Journal of Australia in 1999 and updated in 2003. Seventeen aspects of treatment were systematically reviewed, including mobilisation after surgery. Early assisted ambulation within 48 hours post surgery was recommended (Chilov 2003 p 490). However, the recommendation was based on observational (level 3) evidence only. Early mobilization post surgery is resource intensive. Early mobilization is challenging and uncomfortable for the patient and requires the assistance of one or sometimes two, physiotherapists available seven days per week. Benefits must be rigorously evaluated to justify recommendation. We undertook a randomized controlled trial of the effect of two different 'time to first ambulation' intervals after hip fracture surgery on patient and hospital outcomes.Our hypothesis was that early mobilisation would accelerate functional recovery after hip fracture surgery.

To evaluate the analgesic potential of an neural blockade (Fascia iliaca compartment) with local anaesthetics in patients with hip fracture immediately after arrival in the emergency department.

Femoral neck fractures represent about half of the hip fractures and are further divided into displaced and undisplaced fractures. Displaced femoral neck fractures are almost always treated surgically with arthroplasty. However there is an ongoing debate on which implant is superior for undisplaced fractures. A novel implant design (Pinloc) has been developed by Swemac Innovation AB. While the original implant consisted of 2 isolated hook pins, the modified design consists of 3 titanium hook pins interlocked in an aluminum plate. Interlocking is a new principle of implant design and improves fixation and load transfer amongst the pins. The superiority of the modified design is so far only proven preclinically. The role of the Pinloc in clinical use remains unclear. Investigators are planning a randomized controlled trial on undisplaced femoral neck fractures to establish a method for implanting the tantalum markers, to observe the fracture healing process and to further investigate the role of the Pinloc.

The Null Hypothesis is that there is no association between Pain regime and the functional performance among geriatric patients having traumatic hip fracture. Two limbs are being assessed:1. Three weeks of regular oral Panadol and Tramadol after hip fracture 2. Oral Panadol and tramadol taking in p.r.n. basis. Functional outcome including Numerical Rate Scale for pain assessment, Functional Independency Measure and Elderly Mobility Score are chosen.

Fifty patients with hip arthroplasty were purposively recruited for the study. They were allocated into two groups randomly with equal number. One group had TEN, other served as control. Pain intensity was measured every day of the treatment.

In England each year over 9,000 people fracture their hip. Most of these are elderly females with the fracture occurring after a fall. Approximately half of these fractures are classified as intracapsular fractures because of their close proximity to the hip joint. The majority of these fractures are treated surgically by excising the broken femoral neck and removing the femoral head (ball part of the hip joint) and replacing it with an artificial hip joint. This hip replacement has traditionally been a hemiarthroplasty or sometimes termed a 'half hip replacement' in which only the ball part of the hip joint is replaced. An alternative type of hip replacement is the full total hip replacement in which the socket part of the joint is also replaced. This is the operation that is used for replacing arthritic hips. In recent years there have been a number of randomised trials that have compared the outcome for patients with an intracapsular hip fracture treated with either a partial hip replacement (hemiarthroplasty) against those treated with a total hip replacement (THR). Results to date have suggested slightly better long term functional results for those treated with a THR, but it still remains unclear if these benefits are offset by the increased surgical complexity of the procedure and the extra cost involved for a THR. At present the numbers of studies on this topic are too few with limited patient numbers to make any definite conclusions. This study aims to add to the research studies by comparing the two surgical procedures, to enable orthopaedic surgeons to determine the optimum surgical treatment for this common and disabling condition.

Hip fracture is a major health problem facing older adults. Hip fractures result in higher mortality, morbidity, and costs than all other osteoporotic fractures combined. When returning home following hip fracture surgery, patients are at high risk of adverse outcomes (e.g., secondary fractures, institutionalisation, and death). Objectives: This study aims to finalize and pilot test a new program of care including a user-friendly toolkit containing a home-based physiotherapy exercise and pain management program to help community-dwelling older adults recover after hip fractures. Methods: This study will be two stages: First, finalizing the program. The investigators have created a self-explanatory toolkit that includes an illustrated exercise program based on a critical analysis of previous programs for hip fracture patients. The investigators will organize focus groups and conduct semi-structured interviews with patients, caregivers, policymakers, and healthcare providers to review the program and provide feedback. Second, conducting a feasibility study. The investigators will pilot the program in a randomized trial with community-dwelling hip fracture patients and compare the intervention with conventional care. Expected Outcomes: While the number of hip fracture survivors is increasing, they are becoming frailer, and their functional recovery has not improved, making this study timely and relevant. With the current focus on helping older adults "age in place," the proposed project addresses a vital health system challenge: helping older hip fracture patients access proper rehabilitation, so they can stay independent in their homes.