Active clinical trials for "Hip Fractures"

The purpose of the study is to Compare the stability of the fracture and pain after surgery by measuring the stride length and weight bearing on the operated leg. This study will compare these parameters between two different proximal femur nails used for fixing hip fractures.

In major orthopaedic surgery of the lower extremities both continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) and combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSE) are safe and reliable anaesthesia methods. Our results suggest that both continuous spinal anesthesia and combined spinal epidural anesthesia provide good surgical conditions with a low incidence of complications. The sensory block level and hemodynamic changes were lesser with CSA.

The hip semiendoprosthesis is an acceptable method to treat the proximal femoral fractures. Traditionally, the cemented version of the semiendoprosthesis has been used for this indication. However, the cementing carries a risk of fat embolism during the pressurization of the cement. The fat embolism can be avoided when using the non-cemented semiendoprosthesis. In this study we want to find out whether there are any differences in the treatment results between the cemented and non-cemented semiendoprostheses when treating the proximal femoral fractures.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether fast-tracking hip fracture patients to geriatric medicine wards, as opposed to standard care at the emergency room, results in less complications and shorter hospitalization for the patients.

This pilot study will look at whether it is possible to give better physical therapy to people with cognitive limitations who have had a hip fracture.

Despite many previous studies, whether anesthetic technique will significantly affect overall patient outcome, morbidity and mortality in elderly hip fracture patients is controversial. Due to old age, poor patient condition and emergent clinical settings, patients undergoing surgical procedures for hip fracture management are often subject to poor postoperative outcome and high mortality rates. While many studies have reported that regional anesthesia leads to improved postoperative outcome after hip fracture surgery, others have concluded otherwise. Moreover, because the majority of these previous studies are retrospective cohorts or systemic reviews, there is a need for randomized clinical trials to provide high quality evidence. This study aims to compare patient outcome between three different anesthetic techniques in elderly patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture management by evaluating proinflammatory cytokines, chemistry lab testing and clinical outcome between general anesthesia with either desflurane or propofol-based TIVA and spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine.

The study evaluates the potential beneficial effects on hemodynamics when hypobaric bupivacaine is used instead of isobaric bupivacaine in continuous spinal anesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture in elderly patients. Half of the patients will receive hypobaric bupivacaine and the over half will reveive isobaric bupivacaine and hemodynamic data will be compared.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of Tranexamic Acid (TXA) on blood loss and need for perioperative blood transfusion following intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femur fractures. TXA is a antifibrinolytic medication that prevents the breakdown of blood clots by inhibiting the activation of plasminogen to plasmin in the coagulation cascade. Our hypothesis is that by providing TXA at the time of hospital admission it will decrease the amount of preoperative and intraoperative bleeding thereby leading to a decreased need for post-operative transfusion. This a double blinded, placebo controlled, therapeutic trial in which half of patients will be randomized to receive TXA at the time of hospital admission and half of patients will receive a placebo.

Hip fractures are common, costly and affect older people - Canadians spend 1 billion dollars to treat hip fractures each year. Unfortunately, as many as two-thirds of hip fracture cases suffer a complication known as delirium, or acute confusion. Patients with delirium may become frightened and agitated. This in turn leads to other serious problems. Having delirium doubles the chances of dying or can increase the need for admission into a nursing home. People with delirium spend an extra week in hospital on average. Using ultrasound to locate and 'freeze' or block specific nerves can stop hip fracture pain almost immediately, and use of this technique is known to reduce delirium when administered by Anaesthetists to patients at the time of their hip operation. Unfortunately, patients with hip fractures commonly wait hours or even days in the Emergency Department (ED) prior to their operation. Currently, these patients are given narcotic pain killers like morphine to dull their pain, as most ED physicians have not been trained in using this 'freezing' technique and Anaesthetists are rarely able to leave the operating room to administer freezing to patient in the ED. The EDU-RAPID study will test whether training ED physicians on how to use the nerve freezing technique will reduce the number of patients who develop delirium after a hip fracture. To study this, ED physicians will be trained at 6 hospitals in small groups every 6 weeks over 18 months. The study will look at how patients who are treated by ED physician who has been trained compare to patients treated by a ED physician who has not yet been trained. Also, the study will see if the training motivates ED physicians to use the block regularly. If correct, this study could significantly improve the comfort, quality of life, and independence of patients who suffer a hip fracture. In addition, if the study shows a reduction in delirium rates, this could represent a significant cost reduction to the health care system.

The investigators aimed to evaluate the effect of early pelvic binder use in emergency management of suspected pelvic trauma, compared with the conventional stepwise approach.