Active clinical trials for "HIV Infections"

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of several anti-HIV treatment strategies in resource-poor South African communities. The strategies being studied are using specially trained doctors or nurses to administer HIV care.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of epoetin alfa in AIDS patients for the treatment of anemia that is a result of the disease and zidovudine (AZT) treatment. Epoetin alfa is a genetically engineered protein that stimulates red blood cell production.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of pregabalin in reducing neuropathic pain associated with HIV neuropathy

Interrupting HAART during limited periods of time ("structured treatment interruption : STI") could entail benefits (better long term tolerance, lower drug-induced viral resistance, lower cost) but also concomitant risks (lower efficacy, higher drug-induced viral resistance). At present, the benefit/risk ratio of STI is unclear. Several STI trials are in progress in industrialised countries. This trial aim at assessing the benefits and risks of two different STI strategies in West Africa.

This is a 48-week study to collect additional information on the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral activity of an investigational regimen (course of therapy) including FDA approved HIV drugs in HIV-infected patients 2 - 18 years old.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and side effects of beta-D-2,6-diaminopurine dioxolane (DAPD) compared to DAPD plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) when these drugs are added to the anti-HIV treatment regimens of people infected with HIV. Some studies have shown that DAPD and MMF can help fight HIV. However, neither DAPD nor MMF has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating HIV infection. This study will help doctors decide if DAPD and MMF are good drugs for treating HIV.

The purpose of this study is to study amprenavir/ritonavir, saquinavir/ritonavir or efavirenz in HIV-infected patients following failure with Kaletra (ABT-378/ritonavir) as their first protease inhibitor based HAART.

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of a high dose of ABT-378/ritonavir

Anti-HIV drug therapy works best when the drugs are taken exactly as prescribed by a doctor. Because anti-HIV therapy often involves multiple drugs, some people have difficulty taking them all correctly. The easier it is to take anti-HIV drugs, the more likely people will take them as prescribed and get the best results. This study will see if people are more successful in taking anti-HIV drugs once a day or twice a day. It also will determine if having a health care professional oversee each weekday dose helps people control their HIV infection. The study will compare taking a three-drug combination twice a day versus taking a three-drug combination just once a day. The study will also compare patients taking the drugs on their own to patients taking the drugs in the presence of a clinical worker. Viral load (amount of HIV in the blood) and drug side effects will be measured.

The objectives of this study are to explore the metabolic toxicities associated with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus saquinavir mesylate (INV) versus LPV/r plus Combivir in antiretroviral naïve subjects and to assess the overall safety, tolerability and efficacy of LPV/r plus INV versus LPV/r plus Combivir in antiretroviral naïve subjects and to assess the pharmacokinetics of 400 mg INV taken twice a day (BID), 600 mg INV BID and 800 mg INV BID in combination with 400 mg lopinavir/100 mg ritonavir plus 150 mg lamivudine/300 mg zidovudine BID.