Active clinical trials for "Giant Cell Arteritis"

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab compared to placebo, in combination with a 26-week glucocorticoid (GC) taper regimen, in adult participants with new-onset or relapsing giant cell arteritis (GCA).

This study consists of two periods. The objective of Period 1 is to evaluate the efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with a 26-week corticosteroid (CS) taper regimen compared to placebo in combination with a 52-week CS taper regimen, as measured by the proportion of participants in sustained remission at Week 52, and to assess the safety and tolerability of upadacitinib in participants with giant cell arteritis (GCA). The objective of period 2 is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuing versus withdrawing upadacitinib in maintaining remission in participants who achieved sustained remission in Period 1.

Vasculitis occur when the body's immune system, rather than protecting the body, attacks blood vessels, causing injury to the vessel and the part of the body it supplies with blood. Vasculitis is rare, and there are a number of different types, which can affect both adults and children. We treat vasculitis with steroids and drugs aiming to damp down the activity of the immune system, but they often cause side effects. Some patients do not improve with this treatment, or cannot tolerate it and their vasculitis worsens; this is known as refractory vasculitis. Patients with refractory vasculitis are at high risk of health complications from the disease and its therapy and are in need of newer more effective treatments with fewer side effects. Biologics are drugs which are designed to precisely target parts of the immune system and may have fewer side effects. Biologics have been used for several years to treat vasculitis, particularly anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis or AAV. However, for many of the rarer types of vasculitis, and especially those vasculitis disease types that are not ANCA-associated, there is little information to support use of biologic therapies as effective treatments. The purpose of this trial is to find out whether biologics are effective and represent value for money for participants with refractory vasculitis. The trial will include patients with Non-ANCA-associated vasculitis (NAAV)

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a large-vessel vasculitis that typically occurs in people over the age of 50. Corticosteroids (GC) are the cornerstone of treatment for GCA. French guidelines recommend starting at 0.7 or 1 mg/kg/day at diagnosis, depending on the occurence of ischemic complication(s). Then, it is recommended to gradually decrease their dose to achieve withdrawal in 12 to 24 months. Despite this treatment, 47% of patients relapse. Relapses are favored by rapid reduction of corticosteroid doses and large vessel involvement at diagnosis. Fortunately, relapses are severe in only 3.3% of cases and ischemic complications are very rare. However, this contributes to prolonging the duration of corticosteroid treatment and thus the risk of cortico-induced adverse events, which have not been significantly reduced in the last 20 years. The main risk factors for the development of steroid-related complications are advanced age and cumulative steroid dose. For this reason, the development of cortisone-sparing strategies is necessary to improve the management of patients with GCA. Thanks to major advances in the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of GCA, new therapeutic targets have been discovered. For example, the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), an anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, has been demonstrated in two phase 2 trials and one phase 3 trial, leading to its approval for the management of patients requiring rapid reduction in corticosteroid doses and/or those relapsing repeatedly on prednisone >7.5 mg/day. In recently published US guidelines, TCZ can even be used at diagnosis to reduce the need for corticosteroid therapy.5 Indeed, TCZ appears to be remarkably effective in controlling GCA activity and saves approximately 2000 mg of prednisone in cumulative dose. At present, the place of TCZ compared to methotrexate in the therapeutic strategy is still being evaluated, notably through the METOGiA study (PHRC-N 2017), which is being conducted by our team. Inclusions for METOGiA ended in March 2023 with results expected in 2025. Outside of this study, approximately 1500 patients are currently receiving TCZ treatment for GCA (data from ROCHE-CHUGAI). There is no doubt that TCZ treatment is effective and rather well tolerated in the elderly population, but it generates problems that are not solved to date: the cost (~900€/month) the difficulty monitoring these patients because the biological markers usually used to monitor GCA (CRP, ESR, fibrinogen) can no longer be measured since TCZ blocks their production by the hepatocytes. Monitoring of disease activity therefore requires very careful clinical examination and the use of expensive imaging tests such as PET scans because GCA can be active despite normal ESR, CRP and fibrinogen levels. Some studies suggest that monitoring serum IL-6 may help identify patients with active disease, but this test is not readily available and the threshold above which relapse should be suspected is unclear because TCZ induces an increase in serum IL-6 levels by blocking IL-6 receptors, even in patients in remission. For the same reasons, infections are difficult to detect in patients treated with TCZ. This raises the question of how to discontinue this treatment, especially since other treatments that do not interfere with CRP, ESR, or fibrinogen measurements are being evaluated. This shows that this treatment tends to be prolonged well beyond one year when the disease is often in remission without corticosteroids. This is probably related to two factors: 1/ the fear of relapse after treatment withdrawal; 2/ the absence of a scheme for withdrawing TCZ. The risk of relapse after stopping TCZ has been reported in several studies, in particular the long-term follow-up of phase 2 and 3 trials that demonstrated the efficacy of TCZ for the treatment of GCA. Overall, regardless of the duration of TCZ treatment, the risk of relapse is approximately 40% 6 months after the last injection of TCZ, and the risk of relapse is higher if the large arteries (aorta and its branches) are involved. Thus, although the available data are limited, it appears that tapering rather than immediately stopping TCZ limits the risk of relapse after full withdrawal.

Background: - Vasculitis is a group of diseases that inflame and damage blood vessels and tissue. It can cause many medical problems. Few tests can diagnose the disease, and none can reliably predict a relapse. Researchers want to study people s genes and follow people over time to see how the disease affects them. Objective: - To learn the signs, symptoms, imaging tests, genetic markers, and blood tests that can help identify people with vasculitis and predict what will happen to them over time. Eligibility: People age 3 and older who have or are thought to have vasculitis, or are related to someone with it. Healthy volunteers. Design: Participants will be evaluated by a doctor who has expertise caring for patients with vasculitis. Participants will give a blood sample. Some will give a urine sample. Some participants may have brushings or biopsies taken from the inside lining of the nose. Images of participants blood vessels may be taken using scans. For some scans, participants will lie on a table that moves in and out of a cylinder that takes pictures. For some scans, a contrast agent may be injected into an arm vein. Other scans may use a radioactive form of sugar. Healthy minors will not have scans. Some participants will answer questionnaires. - Some participants will have their tests done at NIH. Others will have their doctor take the blood, saliva, or cheek swab samples and send them to NIH. Some participants will have one visit lasting 1-2 (but sometimes up to 4) days. Some participants may have follow-up visits every 3 - 6 months, indefinitely.

This prospective study is to explore different predictive factors for response to steroid treatment in patients with PMR and/or GCA. It evaluates the association of endogenous GC suppression (plasma and urinary cortisol and cortisone) to the responsiveness of PMR/GCA to GCs.

Tocilizumab and Sarilumab are first-line biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) which inhibits Interleukin 6 (IL-6) pathway through blockade of its receptor on the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis and other rheumatic diseases as Giant Cell Arteritis, Still's disease and Idiopathic Juvenile Arthritis. At present, there is a lack of evidence to recommend the treatment of one bDMARD over another. Seeking for genetic biomarkers to predict response to treatment could be key towards a personalized treatment strategy in rheumatology. The investigators aime to evaluate whether functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the IL6R gene could predict response and/or toxicity in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with anti-IL-6 receptor drugs.

The purpose of this study is to identify genes that increase the risk of developing vasculitis, a group of severe diseases that feature inflammation of blood vessels. Results of these studies will provide vasculitis researchers with insight into the causes of these diseases and generate new ideas for diagnostic tests and therapies, and will be of great interest to the larger communities of researchers investigating vasculitis and other autoimmune, inflammatory, and vascular diseases.

Corticosteroid therapy has always been the standard treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA), with very good initial clinical efficacy but a high relapse rate when it declines. The target population of this condition, often elderly, is particularly exposed to the numerous undesirable effects of corticosteroid therapy, and this especially as its duration lengthens with the re-increases of doses according to relapses: metabolic complications, osteo-muscular , infectious or neuropsychiatric. Investigators propose to compare prospectively the results of a "conventional" corticosteroid regimen as recommended by European societies, to those of a "lighter and / or shorter" scheme, inspired by recent North American trials. , including the largest prospective global study in the field. Investigators hypothesize non-inferiority of the lightened regimen for relapse rate without relapse at S52, but with a decrease in treatment-related adverse events whose cumulative doses should be lower. Investigators therefore plan to include prospectively over 3 years 150 patients, 75 for each of the two arms, with a newly diagnosed ACG. A randomization of the treatment arm will be performed and a predefined pattern of cortisone adapted to body weight will be given to the patient. Relapse rates, maintenance of remission, cumulative doses of cortisone and adverse effects of treatment will be analyzed at the 52nd week of the introduction of corticosteroid therapy. An interim analysis is planned at S28.

A multi-centre observational study recruiting prospective and retrospective cohorts of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA). The primary aim is to find genetic determinants of GCA and PMR susceptibility, in order to yield novel insights into disease pathogenesis. A subset of the retrospective cohort is also enrolled in a post-marketing surveillance registry of patients eligible for, or receiving tocilizumab, to treat their relapsing or refractory GCA.