Active clinical trials for "Influenza, Human"

Previous studies have demonstrated the immunogenicity and safety of the co-administration of the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) with the polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPV) or pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV). However, there is no direct comparison study that evaluates the immunogenicity and safety of IIV3 given concomitantly with PCV13 or PPV23 in the elderly. This study is intended to compare the immunogenicity and safety of concomitant administration in the elderly subjects.

The study hypothesis was that two 0.5 mL doses of whole virion monovalent A/H5N1 influenza vaccine (IVACFLU-A/H5N1) adjuvanted with alum would be safe and well tolerated in healthy adults, and that at least one of the two doses tested would be immunogenic in 60% or more of the subjects tested.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and immunogenicity of three seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines (TIVs)manufactured by Glaxosmith Kline (GSK), Beijing Sinovac Biotech (Sinovac) and Shenzhen Sanofi Pasteur (Pasteur) in Chinese healthy servicemen. Using imported GSK's TIV as control, to compare it with other two domestic TIVs in Chinese healthy servicemen.

This study is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind Phase III clinical trial. The aim of the study is to describe the immunogenicity and safety of the quadrivalent cell culture-derived influenza vaccine compared to the trivalent egg-derived influenza vaccine among subjects.

This study is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind Phase III clinical trial. The aim of the study is to describe the immunogenicity and safety of the trivalent cell culture-derived influenza vaccine compared to the trivalent egg-derived influenza vaccine among subjects.

During the 2013-2014 influenza season, CKD patients undergoing HD participated in the study. The patients were randomized into two groups (MF59-adjuvanted vaccine group or non-adjuvanted vaccine group) and were immunized with the respective vaccine. Sera were collected prior to vaccination and at 1and 6 months post vaccination. Levels of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies were measured.

All participants received a single dose of their assigned vaccine on Day 0. They were followed up for immunogenicity and safety through Day 21 post-vaccination. Serious adverse events were collected for 6 months post-vaccination.

Title: A Phase I Study of The Safety, Reactogenicity, Acceptability and Immunogenicity of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Delivered either by Microneedle Patch or by Hypodermic Needle. This is a single center, partially blinded, randomized phase I study in which healthy adult subjects (ages 18-49) will receive either inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) (either by microneedle patch or hypodermic needle) or placebo (by microneedle patch). This study is designed to investigate the safety, reactogenicity, acceptability and immunogenicity of an inactivated influenza vaccine delivered by microneedle patch.

The purpose of this study is to compare immunogenicity and safety of ASP7374 (cell-culture derived influenza vaccine) with those of approved egg-derived trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) in elderly subjects.

To evaluate the safety profile of two intranasal doses of LAIV A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) in healthy adults.