Active clinical trials for "Influenza, Human"

Background: Influenza (flu) is a contagious respiratory virus that makes humans sick. Usually its symptoms are mild, but they can be dangerous. Researchers want to see if one way of giving the flu vaccine is more effective than another. Objective: To compare the body s ability to fight infection when a flu vaccine is given in the nose versus the arm. Eligibility: Healthy, nonsmoking adults ages 18 55. They must be willing to stay in isolation for at least 9 days. They must not have had the flu vaccine since September 1, 2018. Design: Participants must be willing to use birth control or abstinence from visit 1 until 8 weeks after getting the flu virus. Participants will have at least 3 clinic visits over about a month. Visits may include: Medical history Physical exam Blood and urine tests Nasal samples collected Heart and lung function tests At the first visit, participants will get either: Flu vaccine as injection in an arm muscle plus salt water sprays in the nose OR flu vaccine as sprays in the nose plus salt water injection in an arm Within the next few months, participants will stay in an isolation room for at least 9 days. They will be with up to 20 participants. Those who test positive for recreational drugs will leave the study. Participants will: Repeat study tests Answer questions about flu symptoms Have the flu virus sprayed into their nose once Be monitored by a medical team Participants will have at least 2 follow-up visits and repeat study tests.

The purpose of this research study is to better understand the immune response to the Adjuvanted Subunit flu vaccine (MF59) and the High Dose flu vaccine (HDFlu) in people 65 years of age and older. The research team will be studying why immune response diminishes as people get older in both men and women. The ultimate goal is to understand how flu immunity develops after vaccination. This information may lead to the development of more effective flu vaccines in the future.

Seasonal influenza vaccination was used to assess whether induction of immunity as well as the rate of side effects is influenced by the timing of the last training session before vaccination. Healthy athletes were vaccinated with the tetravalent influenza vaccine and blood samples were collected before, 1, 2 and 26 weeks after vaccination. The athletes were randomly assigned to vaccination within 2 hours after the last training session ("2h") vs. vaccination after a resting period of at least 26 hours ("26h"). All participants documented side effects and training restrictions. Influenza-specific T-cells were quantified after stimulation with the vaccine based on intracellular cytokine staining. Antibodies were quantified by ELISA and neutralisation assay.

This study will compare influenza vaccine responses in monozygotic and dizygotic twins.

This is a first in man dose escalation study, to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the candidate influenza vaccine ChAdOx1-NP+M1. All volunteers recruited will be healthy adults aged 18-50. Volunteers will be enrolled and doses will be escalated according to a "3+3" study plan. Up to 24 volunteers will be vaccinated. Following one dose of the vaccine, volunteers will be followed up to assess the side effect profile of the vaccine and to take blood tests. A series of immunology assays will be performed to determine how potent the vaccine is at inducing an immune response.

The investigators hypothesize that people working in an acute care hospital setting will be able to successfully self-administer the intradermal vaccine (Intanza) in less time than nurse-administration of the regular intramuscular influenza vaccine (Vaxigrip). The investigators also hypothesize that people administering the intradermal vaccine for the second time will take less time to successfully administer than people administering it for the first time.

Influenza remains a potentially significant and largely preventable source of morbidity and mortality, yet vaccine coverage is low. Young children are at particular risk for underimmunization because they may need to receive 2 doses in a current season. Even among those young children that initiate vaccination, only 40% receive the important second dose, yet one dose does not confer adequate protection. Low-income, urban children may be at particular risk of not receiving two doses. While traditional mail and phone immunization reminders notifying families that a vaccine is due have had limited efficacy in low-income, urban populations, we have demonstrated the success of using text messages. Comparing the effectiveness of different forms of reminders on receipt of this critical second dose of influenza vaccine has not been studied. Besides failure to remember to return for subsequent doses, receipt of 2 doses of influenza vaccine in a season can be affected by limited health literacy regarding influenza vaccination, particularly associated with understanding the need for a second dose since not all children require it. Text messaging offers the ability to combine health literacy promoting information and reminders in a scalable, efficient manner for populations at high risk for underimmunization, limited health literacy, and influenza spread. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine whether the provision of interactive vaccine health literacy-promoting information in text message vaccine reminders improves receipt and timeliness of the second dose of influenza vaccine within a season for underserved children in need of two doses.

Infants and young children do not respond as well as adults to the flu vaccines currently available in the UK. Fluad, is a different type of influenza vaccine that has been available in the European continent for the last decade, and contains an adjuvant known as MF59. This vaccine has been used extensively in adults over 65 years of age. It has been administered to over 4000 children in previous studies, which have shown that it produces an enhanced immune response in children compared with traditional vaccines, and that it is safe in this age group. It is, however, not yet licensed for use in children. The reason for this new study is to gain a better understanding of the how this vaccine is stimulating the immune system, by looking to see which parts of the genetic code are 'switched on' in response to immunisation, and to see how this differs from the response to currently used flu vaccines. To do this the Oxford Vaccine Group will enrol children aged 14 to 26 months to receive either the influenza vaccine with the MF59 adjuvant (ATIV) or one of the influenza vaccines currently available in the UK (Agrippal/ Begripal or TIV). The study will also help to find out whether it is possible to identify patterns of genetic response which can predict responses to immunisation. Being able to do so could potentially enable more rapid development of vaccines against influenza and other diseases in the future. We will also measure how well the immune system responds to the two vaccines and look at any side effects. The study is funded by Aditec is a collaborative research programme that aims to accelerate the development of novel and powerful immunisation technologies for the next generation of human vaccines.

The goal of this project is to see if encouraging an individual to privately choose in advance a narrow time window in which to obtain a flu vaccination shot affects the likelihood that he or she will become vaccinated.

The purpose of this pilot research project is to look at the effect of the inactivated influenza vaccine (seasonal flu shot) on early signs of immune or germ-fighting response known as cytokines or signal molecules. The investigators also want to see if the timing of vaccine administration has any effect on women's reproductive hormones. The investigators hypothesis is that influenza vaccine given right before ovulation may change the hormone levels usually seen after ovulation. Thi