Active clinical trials for "Hyperalgesia"

Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis may need surgery to correct their scoliosis. General anesthesia is required for this surgery, and a multimodal analgesic regimen using combinations of opioid and non-opioid medications is the standard of care. The purpose of this study is to compare two combinations of total intravenous anesthetic medications in children with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis having posterior spinal fusion surgery. Participants in the study will be randomly selected to receive either Propofol and Remifentanil or Propofol and Dexmedetomidine as their total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). TIVA is favored over gas anesthesia because gas anesthesia can affect the neurological monitoring necessary for this surgery. The first combination (Propofol + Remifentanil) is the most common one used for this surgery at our institution, and the second combination (Propofol + Dexmedetomidine) is more commonly used in adult spine surgery. Though Dexmedetomidine is not approved for pediatric use by the FDA, it is widely used in pediatric patients for procedural sedation and surgical anesthesia in the US and worldwide. Both anesthetic combinations are used safely in adult and pediatric patients at our institution. Although remifentanil works fast and is an excellent pain medication during surgery, there are reports that it's use can cause increased pain sensitivity and greater need for narcotic pain medication after surgery. This phenomenon is known as opioid-induced hyperalgesia. The investigators hypothesize that avoiding the use of remifentanil in the TIVA by using dexmedetomidine could avoid OIH and thus result in superior postop pain control. Our study's primary goal is to measure the total opioid consumption on postoperative days (POD)# 0 and 1. Our secondary goals are to measure the pain scores on a visual analog scale (VAS) on POD# 0 and 1, measure the time it takes for participants to move their feet to command when surgery is done, and measure the time it takes for participants to be extubated when surgery is done. By comparing these measurements, the investigators hope to find out if there is any significant difference between the two TIVAs in terms of postop opioid requirements, pain scores, and time to wake up from anesthesia. The investigators hope that our study gives us more knowledge on how to better treat postoperative pain in children who have spine surgery to correct their

This study will examine the efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Type A ("Botox") in treating Allodynic-type neuropathic pain in people with spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis. Neuropathic pain is pain initiated or caused by injury to or disease of the nervous system, and is common in spinal cord injury patients or people with multiple sclerosis. Allodynia is a type of neuropathic pain caused by something that normally would not cause pain, such as light touch, pressure from clothing, or bed sheets brushing against the skin. Botox has been used to treat the muscle overactivity that causes spasticity in spinal cord injured patients. It has been noticed to exert some analgesic(pain relieving) effect, and has recently been studied as a treatment for neuropathic pain. We want to see if Botox, injected intradermally, will relieve the symptoms of allodynic-type neuropathic pain. 24 volunteers are to be enrolled, with 16 receiving active treatment, and 8 "controls" receiving placebo.

Cardiac surgery often induces acute postoperative pain and moreover chronic dysesthesia frequently occur long-term after sternotomy. The high doses of intraoperative opioïds are well known to enhance postoperative hyperalgesia (HA) and a perioperative local anesthetic agent infusion is one of the therapeutic strategies used to limit this phenomena. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a continuous Ropivacaïne sternal infusion compared with a saline serum infusion to limit postoperative HA, pain and morphine consumption (M) after sternotomy in cardiac surgery. This strategy could lead to lower postoperative morphine consumption and opioïd induced hyperalgesia.

This study is being conducted to assess the effects of GSK1014802 and a positive control, lidocaine, on tests of peripheral nerve excitability. This will be a double blind, placebo controlled, 4-period cross over study. Approximately 20 subjects will be randomised to one of two doses of a GSK1014802, lidocaine and placebo with at least 2 weeks between sessions. A follow-up will occur 7-15 days after the last dose. During treatment session 3 on the 6th October 2009, one subject had a pattern of AEs of severe intensity, suggestive of brain stem toxicity / encephalopathy during the lidocaine/saline infusion period. Although recognised in the literature when lidocaine was used in patients for treatment of pain, these AEs were unusual in studies in healthy subjects. The study was suspended to allow re-evaluation of the risk:benefit balance of lidocaine/saline infusion in healthy subjects in this study. It was decided that continuation of the use of lidocaine (positive control) would risk the safety of subjects. Continuation without the positive control was not possible as it would compromise the scientific integrity of the design.

Superficial injection of Botulinum toxin has been advocated for cosmetic purposes but has also been reported to be helpful for some pain conditions. The investigators have observed prolonged profound analgesia following subcutaneous superficial injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTA) in patients with certain types of neuropathic pain. the investigators propose to study if addition of BTA extends pain relief compared to placebo when injected subcutaneously into areas of cutaneous allodynia (the property that a normally non-noxious stimulus is perceived as painful).

The effect of baclofen (GABAB agonist), diltiazem (muscle relaxant) and placebo will be compared in a double-blinded randomized study for the treatment of NCCP. Cerebral cortical, brainstem and spinal evoked potentials before and after treatment will be evaluated. Results of this study will shed lights on pathogenesis and treatment of NCCP in Chinese.We hypothesize that Baclofen alleviates visceral hyperalgesia in NCCP patients by suppressing afferent sensory pathway.

The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy of etoricoxib on pain patients. The investigators assume that patients with neuropathic pain will have greater pain relief then patients on placebo.

MOR-NRI like Tapentadol are expected to reduce signs and symptoms of central sensitisation besides effectively reducing pain intensity in pain. Human pain surrogate models can serve in this proof-of-concept study to further elucidate this assumption.

Chronic pain is a significant public health concern in the U.S., for which prescription opioids have historically been the standard treatment. This has resulted in striking rates of opioid use disorders and fatal overdoses. Identifying non-opioid medications for the management of chronic pain with minimal abuse liability is a public health necessity, and cannabinoids are a promising drug class for this purpose. More than 80% of medicinal cannabis users report pain as their primary medical indication. These patients tend to seek products that are low in delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; the primary psychoactive, and thus intoxicating, component of cannabis), and high in cannabidiol (CBD), a cannabinoid that purportedly has therapeutic benefit for pain but does not produce intoxicating effects [1]. However, there are few well-controlled human laboratory studies assessing the efficacy of high-CBD cannabis for pain in the context of abuse, and even less is known regarding the effects of daily repeated use of cannabis on pain and its relationship to abuse liability. The proposed randomized, within-subjects, placebo-controlled 16-day crossover inpatient human laboratory pilot study (N = 16 healthy cannabis users; 8 men, 8 women) will address important gaps in our understanding of the potential therapeutic utility of cannabis for pain: 1) If repeated cannabis use can result in hyperalgesia; 2) If tolerance to the analgesic and abuse-related effects of cannabis develops and is reversible. Two distinct modalities of experimental pain will be assessed: The Cold Pressor Test (CPT) and Quantitative Sensory Testing Thermal Temporal Summation (QST-TTS), and participants will smoke cannabis 3x/day. Throughout the study, experimental pain and abuse-related effects will be assessed, as will sleep and subjective mood assessments.

Chronic pain is a significant public health concern in the U.S., for which prescription opioids have historically been the standard treatment. This has resulted in striking rates of opioid use disorders and fatal overdoses. Identifying non-opioid medications for the management of chronic pain with minimal abuse liability is a public health necessity, and cannabinoids are a promising drug class for this purpose. More than 80% of medicinal cannabis users report pain as their primary medical indication, and they report experiencing minimal psychoactive effects. However, there are few well-controlled human laboratory studies assessing cannabis' efficacy for pain in the context of abuse, and even less is known regarding the effects of daily repeated use of cannabis on pain and its relationship to abuse liability. Carefully controlled research is needed. The proposed randomized, within-subjects, placebo-controlled 16-day crossover inpatient human laboratory study (N = 20 healthy cannabis users; 10 men, 10 women) will address three important gaps in our understanding of the potential therapeutic utility of cannabis for pain: 1) Does tolerance develop to repeated, daily smoked cannabis administration on measures of experimental pain and abuse liability; 2) If so, is tolerance reversed during the 7 days of abstinence from active-THC cannabis; 3) Does abrupt abstinence from active cannabis increase experimental pain sensitivity, i.e. hyperalgesia, relative to baseline, and do these effects parallel measures of cannabis withdrawal such as disrupted mood and sleep? Two distinct modalities of experimental pain will be assessed: The Cold Pressor Test (CPT) and Quantitative Sensory Testing Thermal Temporal Summation (QST-TTS). Throughout the study, experimental pain and abuse-related effects will be assessed, as will sleep and subjective mood assessments.