Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of AEGR-733 and Atorvastatin vs Atorvastatin Monotherapy in Hypercholesterolemia...
HypercholesterolemiaEvaluate the efficacy of combination therapy AEGR-733 plus atorvastatin 20 mg versus monotherapy on serum lipoproteins over 4 and 8 weeks of therapy. The primary efficacy parameter is percent change in LDL-C after 8 weeks of therapy.
A Multicenter, Active and Placebo-controlled Study of Enteric Coated Sevelamer in Patients With...
HypercholesterolemiaA total of 120 patients will be entered in this study to assess the safety and efficacy of enteric coated sevelamer (ECS) to lower LDL cholesterol. Patients will be randomized into two active treatment groups, two placebo groups and one active control group.
Assessment of Potential Interaction Between Ezetimibe and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Subjects With...
HypercholesterolemiaAtherosclerosisThe purpose of this study is to obtain data of the coadministration of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin to support the concomitant use of these two drugs in patients requiring additional cholesterol-lowering management. Treatment is administered for 14 days.
Comparison of Co-administration of Ezetimibe Plus Simvastatin Versus Simvastatin Alone in Primary...
AtherosclerosisHypercholesterolemia1 moreThis study will assess whether the daily co-administration of ezetimibe 10 mg with ongoing treatment of simvastatin 20 mg will be more effective than treatment with simvastatin 20 mg alone in further reducing LDL-C concentrations.
Ezetimibe Plus Atorvastatin Versus Atorvastatin Alone in Subjects With Primary Hypercholesterolemia...
HypercholesterolemiaAtherosclerosisTo compare the efficacy of ezetimibe 10 mg added daily to ongoing treatment with atorvastatin 10 mg daily versus ezetimibe placebo added daily to ongoing treatment with atorvastatin 10 mg daily in reducing the concentration of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) at endpoint after 6 weeks of treatment.
Randomized Parallel Group Trial Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Ezetimibe With A Statin Versus Statin...
HypercholesterolemiaTo compare the percent (%) change in plasma LDL-C concentration, after a six week course of treatment with ezetimibe 10 mg/day co-administered with an existing statin versus doubling of the existing statin dose
A Study of MK0859 in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Mixed Hyperlipidemia (MK-0859-011)(COMPLETED)...
HypercholesterolemiaHyperlipidemiaThis is a study to assess the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of MK0859 in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (large amounts of cholesterol in the blood) or mixed hyperlipidemia (high levels of LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and low levels of HDL cholesterol in blood) This is an early phase trial and some specific protocol information is in progress and not publicly available at this time. (Full information is available to trial participants).
MK0524A Clinical Efficacy Study (0524A-026)(COMPLETED)
HypercholesterolemiaA study to determine lipid changing effects of MK0524A when compared to niacin extended release (NIASPAN) and placebo.
Yokohama Assessment of Fluvastatin, Pravastatin, Pitavastatin and Atorvastatin in Acute Coronary...
Coronary DiseaseHypercholesterolemiaThe purpose of this study is to compare the effects of fluvastatin, pravastatin, pitavastatin, and atorvastatin on coronary plaque volume in patients with acute coronary syndrome, and to clarify the impact of moderate and intensive lipid lowering therapy on coronary plaque volume, serum lipids, and inflammation markers in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Japanese.
Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Apheresis Using H.E.L.P. Therapy
Familial HypercholesterolemiaThe objectives of this post-surveillance study are to continue to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the H.E.L.P. System. The safety and effectiveness will be assessed by evaluating the occurrence of death, cardiovascular events or interventions, angina, and serious unanticipated adverse effects. Laboratory assessments will be made to document low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction and any effects on other blood components. Quality of life assessments will also be made. The study will also assess the modifications to the H.E.L.P. System, including: use of a single heparin adsorber, instead of two smaller adsorbers; change in the supplier of the ultrafilter (from Secon to Toray); reduction in the number of blood lines from eleven to nine; change from a single-layer to a two-layer precipitate filter. The safety and efficacy of the device specific to these modifications will be evaluated by comparing the safety and efficacy data from the patient registry to the data from the initial clinical study on the device as originally designed.