Active clinical trials for "Hypersensitivity"

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of daily DBV712 250 micrograms (mcg) to induce desensitization to peanut in peanut-allergic children 4-7 years of age over a 12-month treatment period.

The concentration of 16% carbamide peroxide is the highest concentration that European regulations allow for use in home whitening (Council directive 2011/84/EU). This concentration allows for faster results, but instead patients may suffer more frequently from dental sensitivity. The most commonly described side effect of all whitening procedures is the appearance of dentin hypersensitivity, hence the efforts to counteract or overcome this adverse effect. The objective of the study is to clinically evaluate the difference in dental hypersensitivity produced by home dental whitening treatment using 16% carbamide peroxide in a tray for two hours daily applied daily or every other day for three weeks.

The proposed study is an international randomized phase II, multicenter, open-label, three arms trial to assess best supportive care (BSC) vs OSE2101 and vs OSE2101 + pembrolizumab as maintenance treatment for patients with platinum sensitive relapsed ovarian cancers, previously treated with chemotherapy (regardless of the number of prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy), bevacizumab (if eligible) and a PARP inhibitor (if eligible). Patients in Complete Response, Partial Response, or Stable Disease at the end of chemotherapy with at least 4 cycles of platinum based chemotherapy will be randomized in one of the three arms (randomization 1:1:2). They will receive one or the two study treatments or BSC until progression, or intolerance, or up to 2 years (from 1st study treatment dose).

The aim of the study is to explore a prognostic clinical and molecular biomarker profile in a population of BRCA wild-type recurrent high-grade ovarian cancer patients treated with olaparib as maintenance after response to a platinum based therapy as platinum sensitive recurrence treatment.

Psoriasis is a systemic chronic inflammatory immune-mediated disease whose etiopathogenetic mechanisms involve genetic predisposition, and immunological and environmental factors. Its prevalence is about 3% in adults, and it is characterized by well-demarcated, erythematous plaques, covered by silvery-white scales, in elbows, knees, trunk, and scalp. However, psoriasis is far from being considered just a dermatologic condition because the cytokine's cascade, which lays behind its inflammatory and immune-mediated pathogenesis, can determine multiple systemic manifestations. In addition, several patients with psoriasis often complains of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Therefore, authors focused their attention over the gut-skin axis and its possible pathogenetic and immunoregulatory role in psoriasis (i.e., altered gut barrier, increased blood concentration of gut microbiota-derived metabolites, systemic inflammation). In this context, several dietetic approaches (e.g., Mediterranean, low calories, protein-restricted, vegetarian diets, and gluten-free diet, GFD) have shown a certain efficacy in improve psoriasis cutaneous and systemic manifestations. In recent years, the existence of a wheat-related disorder in patients who do not suffer from CD or wheat allergy (WA) has been definitively ascertained and defined as Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity (NCWS). Its prevalence in the general population is unknown, but self-reported NCWS is around 10%. This condition is characterized by both GI and extraintestinal symptoms, which are triggered by wheat ingestion. In these patients, wheat ingestion might lead to alteration in intestinal permeability and gut microbiota and to systemic immune activation and inflammation. Based on the evidence of gut involvement in the pathogenesis and clinical manifestation of psoriasis, as well as on the ability of gluten/wheat to increase intestinal permeability, it could be hypothesized that gluten/wheat may represents one of the pathogenetic environmental factors of psoriasis and that its intake may be able to worsen symptoms in affected patients. The investigators hypothesize that a wheat-free diet (WFD) can reduce the inflammatory state and ameliorate the clinical symptoms in psoriasis patients. The successive clinical and immunologic reaction to the re-exposure to wheat ingestion, performed by an open challenge, will be also evaluated to confirm a wheat-dependent mechanism and to understand the underlining physiopathology.

Recent data show that some foods can increase intestinal mucosa permeability and immune activation of subjects with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Wheat seems the most frequent food which activates this inflammatory response and can cause both GI and extra-intestinal symptoms. Patients suffering from wheat-related troubles, in absence of celiac disease diagnosis, can suffer from non-celiac wheat sensitivity (NCWS) and our previous studies showed that about 25% of them are also affected by autoimmune diseases (AD). A gluten-free diet (GFD) can influence inflammatory pattern of AD, including Sjogren's syndrome (SS). Thus, the investigators would enquire if SS patients may also suffer from NCWS and how a wheat-free diet (WFD) modifies their clinical features, and inflammatory and cytokine pattern. The investigators will also assess how wheat reintroduction, by an open challenge, modifies their clinical parameters, intestinal permeability, and both local and systemic inflammatory response.

To our knowledge, there is no randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of HP. We aim to perform a randomized study to assess the efficacy and safety of a regimen consisting of MMF and prednisolone against a regimen consisting of prednisolone alone for treating fibrotic HP. We hypothesize that the treatment of patients with fibrotic HP with MMF and prednisolone will be more effective and safer than treatment with prednisolone alone.

Food allergy affects 1 in 30 children, and is the commonest trigger for life-threatening reactions (anaphylaxis) in this age group. It is a major public health issue, with practical implications for industry, education and healthcare systems. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an emerging treatment option, where small, increasing doses of a food allergen are used to cause "desensitisation", so food-allergic individuals no longer have symptoms when exposed to the trigger food. However, frequent allergic reactions during OIT (including anaphylaxis) are common, and can lead to patients having to stop treatment. In addition, food-allergic children usually dislike the taste of the food they are allergic too, which affects compliance and treatment success. There is a lack of longer-term data to inform cost-effectiveness analyses for OIT. The NATASHA study will recruit young people from age 6+ years with IgE-mediated peanut allergy, and young people aged 3+ years with IgE-mediated allergy to cow's milk, who will undergo oral immunotherapy for these allergens using real-world foods (taken carefully according to a standardised protocol under medical supervision). In addition to assessing efficacy and safety outcomes, we will also collect longer-term data to evaluate cost-effectiveness in the UK setting.

The study is an open label, multi-centre, randomized phase III study. The patients will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio to treatment consisting of Arm A: MD-SBRT in addition to standard treatment Arm B: Standard treatment Study population: Patients with hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) with oligometastatic disease detected by PSMA-PET/DT. This includes patients with de novo oligometastatic HSPC and recurrent HSPC after primary RT or prostatectomy. Primary endpoint: Failure free survival (time to castration resistant prostate cancer, CRPC) Secondary endpoints: Predictive value of investigated biomarkers in blood and imaging Acute and late toxicity after MD-SBRT PROM at 3 months, 1, 3 and 5 years Overall survival Differences in outcome between patients by strata Stratification: To avoid imbalance between treatment arms the minimisation method will be used to achieve balance between de novo oligo-metastatic and oligo-recurrent patients, as well as treatment site. Safety evaluation: Adverse events and side effects graded according to CTCAE v5.0 will be collected every 6th month. Serious Adverse Events are to be reported within 24 hours throughout the study duration. Statistical methods: Survival endpoints will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method with differences compared using the stratified log-rank test. Randomization time is set as baseline time. Pre-planned subgroup analysis will occur based on pre-specified stratification variables. A Cox multivariable regression model will be used to determine factors predictive of survival. Safety analysis will be performed with Mann-Whitney U-test or Fishers exact test. Criteria for evaluation: Per protocol (patients that have started study treatment) and Intention to treat (all included patients). Planned sample size: 114 patients Analysis plan: The primary end point will be analysed after pre-specified number of events have occurred or at 60 months of follow up. Safety analysis of acute toxicity will take place after median follow up of 6 months. Safety analysis of late toxicity will be analysed after study closure. Duration of the study: Three to five years inclusion. 60 months of follow-up after randomization of the last patient.

This is a single arm phase 1b/2 evaluation of the combination of oregovomab, and bevacizumab, paclitaxel carboplatin in adult subjects with CA125-associated, advanced recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal carcinoma (FIGO Stage III/IV) with BRCA-wild type, previously treated with 1 prior lines of therapy, and with platinum free intervals of >6 months since last platinum-based treatment.