
Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Chlorthalidone Compared to Olmesartan Medoxomil...
Essential HypertensionThe purpose of this study is to compare the antihypertensive effect of azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone, once daily (QD), to olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide in participants with moderate to severe hypertension.

Olmesartan Comparison to Losartan in Hypertensive Subjects
HypertensionThis study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the FDA approved blood pressure medication olmesartan medoxomil compared to the FDA approved medication losartan potassium.

Effects of Nebivolol on Subclinical Left Ventricular dySfunction: A Comparative Study Against Metoprolol...
Primary Arterial HypertensionSummary: Study title: Effects of Nebivolol on subclinical left ventricular dysfunction. A comparative study against Metoprolol. (ENESYS study) Study phase: 3 Study design (parallel, cross-over, etc.), randomisation and blinding procedures, type of control (placebo or active): randomised, parallel, active-controlled, open label Study treatment(s)/drug(s): Nebivolol versus Metoprolol Patients: characteristics: patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy planned total number: 50 Study duration: total enrolment period (months): 18 treatment period (months): 6 follow up period (months): 6 Total study duration (months): 24 Number of Centres: 1 Country(ies): Romania (RO)

Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors in Hemodialysis
Left Ventricular HypertrophyHypertensionBackground: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have a specific cardioprotective effect and, compared to treatment not directly interfering with the renin-angiotensin-system (RAS), significantly reduce cardiovascular (CV) mortality and morbidity in subjects with normal renal function. Despite CV events are the leading cause of death in these patients, no adequately powered trial so far evaluated the specific cardioprotective effect of ACE inhibitors in this population. Objectives: This prospective, randomized, open label, blinded end point (PROBE) trial is primarily aimed at evaluating whether, at comparable blood pressure (BP) control, ACE inhibitor as compared to non-RAS inhibitor therapy significantly reduces the incidence of a composite end point of CV death (including sudden death) and non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke in 266 patients with arterial hypertension (pre-dialysis systolic/diastolic BP >140/90 mmHg or post-dialysis systolic/diastolic BP >130/80 mmHg or antihypertensive therapy) and/or echocardiography evidence of LVH (cardiac mass index >130 g/m2 for men and 100 g/m2 for women) who are on dialysis therapy since at least six months. Secondarily, the study will compare the incidence of single components of the primary outcome, new onset paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation, thrombosis of the artero-venous fistula, new onset, progression or regression of LVH, changes in components of the metabolic syndrome, the safety profile of the two treatment regimens and their cost/effectiveness. Methods: After 1 month wash-out period from previous RAS inhibitor therapy and a baseline evaluation of main clinical and laboratory parameters, patients will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to 2-year treatment with an ACE inhibitor or a BP lowering regiment not including RAS inhibitors. A balanced distribution according to centre, number of dialysis sessions per week (2 or 3), presence of diabetes (YES/NO), arterial hypertension (YES/NO), LVH (YES/NO) will be achieved by the minimization method. Treatment will be adjusted to achieve and maintain a target BP <140/90 mmHg (pre-dialysis) and a target BP <130/80 mmHg (post-dialysis) in both groups. Expected results: ACE inhibitor compared to non-RAS inhibitor therapy is expected to reduce more effectively fatal and non-fatal CV events, prevent or limit progression or induce regression of LVH, improve some components of the metabolic syndrome, and reduce treatment costs for cardiovascular complications. These findings might help achieving more effective cardioprotection in people on chronic dialysis at lower costs.

A 12 Week Comparison of DuoTrav and Xalacom in Open-Angle Glaucoma
Open-Angle GlaucomaOcular HypertensionHypothesis: H1: Efficacy of Duotrav will be superior to Xalacom at 24 hours post dosing when both medications are given in the morning H2: A significant proportion of patients will prefer dosing of once daily topical fixed combination therapy in the morning compared to evening dosing

A Study to Investigate the Antihypertensive Efficacy of MK0954
HypertensionAfter a 4 week placebo period, patients were randomized to Placebo or Losartan 50 mg arms, after 6 weeks non-responders were up titrated to 100 mg losartan for the remaining 6 weeks. This study evaluated if losartan is more effective than placebo in lowering sitting diastolic blood pressure and is well tolerated in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Dose-response Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Beraprost Sodium Modified Release (BPS-MR) in...
Pulmonary Arterial HypertensionThis is a 12-week, international, multicenter, double-blind, three-group, dose-response study to assess the safety and efficacy of BPS-MR in patients with PAH. Eligible patients will have been previously diagnosed with PAH and will be on a stable course of an ERA and/or PDE-5 inhibitor for at least 60 days prior to Baseline. Patients will be randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups in a 1:1:1 ratio and will be stratified by PAH background therapy (Endothelium Receptor Antagonist (ERA), Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5), and both). The treatment groups consist of one Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and two Fixed Dose (FD) groups. Following randomization, patients will begin taking active drug (60µg) orally twice daily. Patients will visit their investigational site at Week 6 and Week 12 for study evaluations.

A Pilot Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Clevidipine in Neurosurgical Patients
HypertensionBrain Tumor1 moreThis protocol describes a study to gain experience in the use of Clevidipine for perioperative blood pressure control in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor or epilepsy focus resection. The purpose of this study is to establish the efficacy of Clevidipine for intraoperative blood pressure control in patients undergoing intracranial procedures, and gather information on the dosage and adverse effects of Clevidipine in neurosurgical patients. This initial pilot experience serves to familiarize the investigators with the use of this drug prior to initiating a planned randomized trial versus institutional standard-of-care therapy. The investigators will obtain greater familiarity with the dosing of clevidipine in this patient population and collect information on the incidence of adverse effects.

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Treprostinil
HypertensionPulmonary1 moreThe purpose of this study is to assess the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of a single dose of oral treprostinil following four different meals of varying caloric and fat content.

The Effect of Nebivolol on Endothelial Dysfunction in African Americans With Hypertension
High Blood PressureHigh blood pressure (hypertension) is called the "silent killer" because many people do not know they have it, and do not know when it is well controlled. Unfortunately, over time uncontrolled hypertension can cause irreversible organ damage that can lead to heart attack, stroke, heart failure, and kidney failure. If a person cannot control their blood pressure with diet and exercise, doctors often prescribe medications to help control the blood pressure. Nebivolol is a medication that has been recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of hypertension. Our study will investigate whether treatment with nebivolol, as compared to another medication called metoprolol, in African Americans with hypertension will be more effective in protecting blood vessels against the harmful effects of high blood pressure. Over time high blood pressure causes hardening of the arteries (atherosclerosis) which leads to narrowing of the blood vessels and reduces blood flow to our organs. Arteries also relax and contract naturally, which further changes the blood supply. When arteries are narrowed, exercise can bring on a condition in which the blood supply is inadequate, and this might result in the sensation of pain. Cells lining our blood vessels produce a variety of substances that normally cause arteries to relax. Two of these substances are called nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). We are trying to determine the nature of these substances in African Americans with high blood pressure and how it is affected by nebivolol and metoprolol. One way to determine this is to inject drugs such as L-NMMA (N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine) or TEA (tetraethylammonium chloride), which block the production of NO and EDHF respectively, and then study what happens to the blood flow at rest and during exercise. It is our thought that nebivolol, in comparison to metoprolol, will increase the substances that naturally cause arteries to relax and improve blood supply.