Active clinical trials for "Hyperventilation"

The diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) is difficult. The metacholine challenge test is not enough specific for the diagnosis of EIB. The exercise challenge test on a cycle ergometer is often use to diagnose this condition. This test has very high specificity, but not enough sensibility because the ventilation achieved during this test is often not big enough to induce a bronchospasm, especially in trained athletes. Eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH) is the recommended test of the Olympic National committee to establish the diagnosis of EIB, but there are no study comparing the sensibility and specificity of the cycle ergometer challenge test and the isocapnic hyperventilation in an establish population of asthmatics. The investigators assume that the sensitivity and specificity of EVH are higher than those of the cycle ergometer for the diagnosis of EIB in a population of asthmatics with symptoms suggestive of bronchospasm on exertion. In a population of asthmatics with exercise symptoms, what is the sensitivity and specificity of EVH and exercise challenge on a cycle ergometer for the diagnosis of EIB?

This is a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery to see the prevalence of hyperventilation.

Dysfunctional breathing (DB) is a respiratory condition characterised by an abnormal breathing pattern, among other complaints, that can occur either in the absence of other pathophysiology (primary DB), e.g. anxiety-related factors, or secondary to cardiopulmonary disease (secondary DB), e.g. asthma. As a consequence, patients may experience breathlessness and present with periods of increased ventilation or erratic breathing, interspersed with episodes of breath holding or deep sighs. In addition to respiratory symptoms, DB also generates non- respiratory symptoms (e.g. dizziness and increased heart rate). It is estimated 1 in 10 people in the United Kingdom (UK) have DB. However, DB remains poorly understood, with no standardised approach to diagnosis and assessment. The purposes of this study are: Study 1) To identify physiological, functional and psychological characteristics of participants with DB compared to healthy participants. Firstly, symptoms, lung function, respiratory gas analysis, exercise capacity, respiratory muscle function, respiratory motion, level of physical activity, quality of life and anxiety & depression scores will be assessed in 20 participants with primary DB, 20 with secondary DB and compared to 20 healthy participants. Study 2) To develop an assessment tool based on physiological, functional or psychological variables found to be different between any of the 3 groups in Study 1. In order to do that, 54 people with DB (between primary and secondary) and 27 people presenting with breathlessness secondary to restrictive lung disease will be assessed. Analysis of these data will determine whether these variables can be used as a diagnostic tool capable of distinguishing DB from restrictive lung diseases characterised by breathlessness. The recruitment period will be 1-2 years, with an individual participation of 9 days; 1-day on site testing, plus 7-day home activity monitoring, and 1 day to return the activity monitor (which will happen whenever the participant needs to return to the site).

This study is to determine the possibility of assessing the level of anxiety in MRI patients by means of the respiration rate (RR) and heart rate (HR) indicators acquired by a fiber-optic sensor system. The mean RR and/or HR values recorded at the beginning and the end of an MRI scanning will be referred to the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores completed before and after the MRI scanning, respectively.