Active clinical trials for "Shock"

The purpose of this trial is to investigate the potential of FE 202158 as a treatment which can stabilize blood pressure for treatment of patients in early septic shock.

Objective Evaluating the safety and efficacy of iloprost and eptifibatide co-administration compared to placebo as an addition to standard care in septic shock patients. Trial rationale Iloprost and eptifibatide combination therapy in septic shock patients is expected to deactivate the endothelium and restore vascular integrity, reduce formation of microvascular thrombosis and dissolve existing clots in the microcirculation and maintain platelet counts, thereby improving platelet-mediated immune function and reducing the risk of bleeding. Together this is expected to translate into reduced organ failure and improved outcome in patients with septic shock. Trial population The trial population is patients >18 years admitted to the ICU with septic shock within the last 24h. Eighteen evaluable septic shock patients will be included. Trial design This is a single center, randomized (2:1, active:placebo), placebo controlled, double-blind investigator-initiated phase IIa trial in patients with septic shock, investigating the safety and efficacy of co-administration of Iloprost and Eptifibatide as a 48h continuous i.v infusion in totally 18 patients. All patients will receive standard ICU care including LMWH thrombosis prophylaxis. As all patients present at the trial site in an acute, critical condition, scientific guardians will co-sign the informed consent form before inclusion. Next-of-kin and the patients' general practitioner will co-sign as soon as possible and the patient will provide informed consent whenever possible. The active treatment is expected to improve the clinical condition of the individual patient and to provide information that may translate into improved therapy of future sepsis patients. During the study, blood samples will be taken at different time points. Patients will be observed and assessed continuously with regards to complications including bleeding. Patients will be actively assessed as long as the patient is in the ICU. During the extended follow up period at day 30 and 90, contact will be made with the patients to follow up on safety events and vital status. The trial is conducted in accordance with the protocol and the current regulatory requirements and legislation in Denmark. Investigational product The active treatment in the trial comprises co-administration of 1 ng/kg/min Ilomedin® and 0.5 µg/kg/min Integrilin® as 48h continuous i.v infusions. The drugs will be purchased and administered according to the product specifications. Placebo The placebo in the trial is 0.9% saline as 48h continuous i.v infusion, which will be used as placebo for both study drugs. The i.v volume of placebo saline to be administered is equal to the administered volume of diluted (in 0.9% saline) active drug. Data protection In compliance with the Danish data protection law, the trial will be approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency. Sponsor of study and financial support This research project is investigator-initiated by the trial sponsor and co-investigator Sisse R. Ostrowski and co-investigator Pär I. Johansson in collaboration with the principal investigator Morten Bestle. It has not received funding from any commercial sponsors. Time line Patient recruitment period runs from September 2014 to August 2015. Follow-up data on 30-day and 90-day outcome and adverse events will be collected. Initial data analyses will be done after completion of 30-day follow-up for all patients. Secondary data analyses will be done after completion of 90-day follow-up for all patients.

The purpose of this study is investigate the effects on systemic hemodynamics and organ function of esmolol when used to maintain heart rate below a predefined threshold in patients with septic shock.

This study seeks to determine if early continuous High Volume Veno-venous Hemofiltration (HVHF) reduces 30-day all cause mortality in post-cardiac surgery patients developing shock requiring high doses catecholamines.

This study aims at comparing the efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C to that of low dose of corticosteroids and at investigating the interaction between these drugs in the management of septic shock

Pyruvate is an intermediate of energy metabolism and was shown to possess pronounced positive inotropic effects in vitro and in vivo without altering myocardial oxygen consumption. Moreover, it was shown that the effects of beta-adrenergic stimulation were potentiated. Thus, it might be possible to save catecholamines in patients with severe heart failure or cardiogenic shock. This study was designed to test the hemodynamic effects of pyruvate administered into a coronary artery in addition to intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation in patients with severe heart failure or in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock after having performed percutaneous coronary intervention. A pronounced improvement in hemodynamics is expected to occur.

This study will test the efficacy of the NASG on women suffering from obstetric hemorrhage as compared to hemorrhaging women who do not receive the NASG.

We hypothesized that the increase in MAP from 65 mmHg to patients' usual level improved sublingual microcirculation.

Septic shock is a frequent syndrome with a 45% mortality rate despite intensive care unit (ICU) care, where free radicals may play a key role, and a >40% decrease in plasma selenium concentration is observed. Selenium is a trace element with both indirect enzymatic anti-oxidant, and direct oxidant properties. High dose of sodium selenite administration could increase antioxidant cells capacities, and reduce inflammation by a direct paradoxical pro-oxidative effect. We conduct a study to evaluate the effects of selenium treatment in comparison to placebo, in septic shock patients. Efficacy will be evaluated by the weaning time of catecholamines.

The purpose of this trial is to determine the influence of colloid versus crystalloid volume resuscitation and of intensive vs conventional insulin therapy on morbidity and mortality of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.