Active clinical trials for "Shock"

The Risk stratification in COVID-19 patients in the ICU (RISC-19-ICU) registry was founded during the emerging SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. COVID-19 is a novel disease caused by infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus that was first described in December 2019. The disease has spread exponentially in many countries and has reached global pandemic status within three months. According to first experience, hospitalization was required in approximately 20 % of cases and severe, life-threatening illness resulted in approximately 10 %. In some countries, health care systems were overwhelmed by the rapid increase in critically ill patients that far exceeded their capacity. It is thus of utmost importance to gain knowledge about the characteristics and course of critically ill patients with COVID-19 and to stratify these patients according to their risk for further deterioration. A key part of fighting this pandemic is to exchange scientific information and advance our understanding of the disease. The Risk stratification in COVID-19 patients in the ICU (RISC-19-ICU) registry aims to collect an anonymized dataset to characterize patients that develop life-threatening critical illness due to COVID-19 and make it accessible to collaborative analysis. The data collected may be composed of a core dataset and/or an extended dataset. The core dataset consists of a basic set of parameters, of which many are commonly generated during treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in an intensive care unit (the individual parameters are marked yellow in the attached case report forms, and are clearly marked on the electronic case report forms during data entry). The extended dataset consists of parameters that may be measured during treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in an intensive care unit, depending on clinical practice, indication and availability of the measurement method. The data accumulating in the registry as the pandemic or subsequent waves develop are made available to the collaborators to support an optimal response to the pandemic threat. The information gained on the initial characteristics and disease course via the RISC-19-ICU registry may contribute to a better understanding of the risk factors for developing critical illness due to COVID-19 and for an unfavorable disease course, and thus support informed patient triage and management decisions. Initial research questions are (I) to perform risk stratification of critically ill patients with COVID-19 to find predictors associated with the development of critical illness due to COVID-19: characterization of the study population, which are critically ill patients with COVID-19: inflammation, oxygenation, circulatory function, among other parameters collected in the registry, and (II) to perform risk stratification of critically ill patients with COVID-19 to predict outcome after ICU admission (ICU mortality, ICU length of stay): characterization of patients grouped by disease course in the ICU, based on inflammation, oxygenation, circulatory function, and other parameters collected in the registry.

Norepinephrine is recommended as first-line vasopressor in critically ill patients, regardless of shock etiology. Its advantages over dopamine and/or epinephrine have been demonstrated, especially by reducing tachycardia events. The current guidelines recommend a mean arterial pressure of at least 65 mmHg that in the resuscitation from sepsis-induced hypoperfusion. Some study reported that delay in initiation of vasopressor therapy was associated with an increase mortality risk in patient with septic shock .The recent experts' opinion suggest that " vasopressors should be started early, before (complete) completion of fluid ressuscitation ". In the event of refractory septic shock, high-dose vasopressors may be used. The precise maximal dose of norepinephrine associated with mortality excess has been poorly studied. High doses have been defined by a cutoff value ranging from 0.5 μg/kg/min to 2 μg/kg/min and recently by 1 μg/kg/min for mortality at 90% and by 0,75 μg/kg/min for mortality at 60%. Furthermore, an increasing vasopressor dosing intensity during the first 24 hours after shock septic was associated with increased mortality depending of fluid administration. If a threshold value of norepinephrine score can be obtained, it could indicate the association with another vasopressor such as vasopressin or surrogates. The primary aim of the present study aimed to confirm if a given norepinephrine dose is associated with mortality. The secondary aims were the link between mortality and norepinephrine duration, cumulative dose in order to build a score that predicts a futility of increasing norepinephrine dose.

In the emergency department (ED), the severity assessment of shock is a fundamental step prior to the admission in intensive care unit (ICU). As biomarkers are time consuming to evaluate severity of the micro and macro-circulation alteration, capillary refill time and skin mottling score are 2 simples, available clinical criteria validated to predict mortality in the ICU. The aim of this study is to provide clinical evidence that capillary refill time and skin mottling score assessed in the ED also predict ICU admission of patients with septic or haemorrhagic shock.

The goal of this study is to compare the characteristics of echocardiography and different monitoring devices in shock patients, the relationship of device parameters to biomarkers associated with shock, and determine if these any of these add clinical utility when predicting the cause of shock. We will perform a prospective, observational study of patients found to have shock physiology in the ED and follow them to determine the final shock category and ultimate outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography can provide evaluation of right or left ventricular dysfunction and volume status during resuscitation of patients with sepsis and septic shock and guide intravenous vasopressor and fluid therapy. While there are numerous echocardiographic studies regarding cardiac function and volume status in patients with established shock, there are none that describe these during the early resuscitation of septic shock. The study objective is to correlate echocardiographic findings with clinical parameters and net fluid balance measured during the early resuscitation of critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock. Aim 1) correlate echocardiographic findings of cardiac function with physiologic markers in the early hours of resuscitation Aim 2) correlate cardiac function and fluid status with clinical outcomes Aim 3) evaluate the change in cardiac function over time in patients with sepsis and septic shock Aim 4) evaluate long term clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis and septic shock.

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a cardiac neurohormone which rapidly released by the ventricle in response to myocardial stretch. BNP has been used as a biomarker of sepsis related cardiac dysfunction and volume overload in critical ill patients. It is also a marker associated with prognosis in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. However, the clinical utility of BNP level in management of early severe sepsis and septic shock over the first 48 hours is not clear. Besides, Lactate represents as a maker of tissue hypoperfusion, which has been used as a guide therapy for sepsis patients and high serum lactate level is independently associated with mortality in severe sepsis. Today, in management of early severe sepsis and septic shock, current guideline emphasize the early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) with achieving the central venous pressure (CVP) level 8-12 mmHg by fluid support first, then targeting the next goal to maintain mean airway pressure (MAP) at least 65 mmHg by vasopressor agent (ie, Norepinephrine) and finally keeping central venous oxyhemoglobin saturation (ScvO2) > 70% via optimal Hct > 30% and dobutamine usage within first 6 hours of emergency department admission. However, the role of BNP and lactate in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock with or without myocardial dysfunction under EGDT management are not clear. The investigators will conduct a prospective observational study to investigate the change of BNP and Lactate within 48 hours in early severe sepsis and septic shock under EGDT management, their association of cardiac dysfunction and their role in predicting various clinical outcome. The investigators also want to see if BNP and lactate could be useful tools to guide the adjustment of optimal fluid supply and the timing of inotropic agent intervention.

Septic shock is a major cause of death in intensive care. Septic shock is often dominated by profound changes in organ functions, of which cardiac failure is one of the most severe. In septic shock, biological markers of cardiac stress are often elevated. It is not known to what extent this indicates structural damage to the heart, or in what way they correlate to echocardiographic signs of heart failure. Here, cardiac failure in ICU patients with septic shock is studied, using biological markers of cardiac stress, inflammatory parameters and echocardiography. Investigators hypothesize that biomarkers of cardiac stress correlate with echocardiographic signs of heart failure, and that they can predict an increased risk of death.

The aim of this study is to assess the causes of death in patients with septic shock in French intensive care units. It is an epidemiologic and descriptive study .

Objectives: To study the prognostic value of the evolution of diastolic function according to fluid balance in patients admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of septic shock, in terms of mortality (ICU and hospital) and mortality at 90 days. 2.4. Secondary objectives: A) Incidence and reversibility of myocardial dysfunction (left ventricular systolic and diastolic) in septic shock. B) Incidence and reversibility of diastolic dysfunction according to the echocardiographic criterion used. C) Incidence and reversibility of right ventricular systolic dysfunction.

The aim of this study is to analyze in patients with undifferentiated shock, the concordance of initial treatment before and after Focus cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) in comparison with the reference one established by an adjudication committee