Active clinical trials for "Incisional Hernia"

22 patients of incisional hernia underwent treatment by double mesh modification of the original Chevrel's technique the primary outcome was recurrence, skin necrosis secondery out come was pain hematoma seroma

The objective of the study is reduction of the incidence of the most frequent complication of abdominal surgery, incisional hernia. In this multi center double-blinded prospective randomized controlled trial, in which a new suture technique using small bites is compared with the traditionally applied large bites (mass closure) technique for midline incisions.

Method of fixation of the mesh in laparoscopic incisional / ventral hernia repair might influence the degree of postoperative pain. The study hypothesis is that there is no difference in postoperative pain between different methods to fix the mesh in laparoscopic incisional / ventral hernia repair.

This study is being conducted to gain a better understanding of the quality of life for patients with a diagnosis of primary and recurrent incisional hernias and 1) who decline to have surgery to repair the hernia or 2) patients who cannot have surgery because their health will not allow them or 3O if surgery to repair the hernia is completed. A comparison will be made between those who receive surgery and those who do not.

In this randomized, controlled, prospective multicentre clinical trial with a parallel group design a large-pore, lightweight polypropylene mesh (Ultrapro®) is compared to a small-pore, heavyweight polypropylene mesh (Premilene®), within a standardized, retromuscular mesh augmentation to identify the superiority of the lightweight mesh. Included patients are examined at five scheduled follow-up visits (5 and 21 days, 4, 12 and 24 months after surgery). The primary outcome criterion is foreign body sensation 12 month after surgery. Further secondary endpoint criteria are the occurrence of haematoma or haematoma requiring surgery at the 5-day visit, seroma, wound infection, and chronic pain within 24 months postoperatively. Quality of life was investigated by the SF-36®.

Optilene® Mesh Elastic and Ultrapro® Mesh will be used for incisional hernia repair. The primary objective of this clinical study is to demonstrate that Optilene® Mesh Elastic is superior to Ultrapro® Mesh in incisional hernia repair in matter of the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire 21 days after mesh insertion. Secondary objectives include the patient's daily activity, the rating of patients pain and the wound assessment determined on several occasions during the six months observation time.

The research hypothesis for this study is to possibly reduce the incidence of incisional hernia 2 years postoperatively after midline laparotomy for treatment of aortic aneurysm from 25% to 5% by mesh augmentation during closure of the laparotomy. The study is designed as a prospective randomised multi-centre trial, randomising patients in 2 groups concerning the surgical technique of the closure of the abdominal wall.

The primary aim of the present study was to show how a national clinical register combined with other nationwide administrative registers may serve as a tool for pre- and post-marketing evaluation of new mesh and mesh fixation products for hernia surgery, using Physiomesh® versus other meshes designed for laparoscopic hernia repair as an example.

A novel concept of self-gripping mesh has been developed to achieve secure and long-term posterior wall reinforcement. ProGrip™ mesh is a lightweight (40g/m2) monofilament polypropylene or polyester mesh with resorbable polylactic acid (PLA) micro-grips, which provide self-gripping properties during the first few months after implantation. The self-fixation of the mesh to the underlying tissues is instantly achieved at application, limiting or avoiding the requirement of sutures (which can penetrate underlying tissues and damage cutaneous nerves), and providing a near tension-¬free repair. Case series confirmed that Parietex ProGrip™ placed in onlay position allows a safe and painless treatment of incisional hernias and provides secure and efficient fixation mesh. On this basis, larger sizes Parietex ProGrip™ meshes have been developed for larger incisional hernia defect treatment. In order to assess the clinical outcomes following the use of ProGrip™ larger sizes in incisional hernia repair, this mono-center observational study has been initiated.

Primary closure of incisional hernia without the use of a mesh shows recurrence rates of up to 54%. If a mesh is used, the defect can be closed tension-free. Using this method, recurrence rates have been reduced to 8-21%. Laparoscopic correction of incisional hernia is a relatively new technique in which the mesh is positioned intraperitoneally. Research has shown that this procedure is technical feasible and may have benefits for the patients. The ongoing debate about the merits of endoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair prompts the need for a level 1 randomized controlled trial.