search

Active clinical trials for "Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn"

Results 811-820 of 1218

The Safety and Dose Response Relationship of Ulinastatin for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome(ARDS)...

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Compared with placebo, evaluate the effects and safety of Ulinastatin(UTI) added to conventional treatment for ARDS; Evaluate the dose response relationship of Ulinastatin for ARDS.

Unknown status19 enrollment criteria

Non-invasive Fluid Management

Respiratory Distress SyndromeAdult

For patients with a condition called acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), managing their fluid levels to achieve a negative balance helps to improve their outcomes. In the past, patients' fluid levels were monitored with central lines placed into the bloodstream. However, most patients are now managed without central lines. A device called a NICOM (noninvasive cardiac output monitor) which monitors patients' heart function, using a few patches which are attached to their chest, may be useful in managing fluid levels without central lines. This study will compare the fluid balance in patients who are managed with typical care to the fluid balance in patients who are managed with the NICOM device.

Unknown status17 enrollment criteria

Sustained Lung Inflation and Pulmonary Mechanics in Preterm Infant

Preterm BirthRespiratory Distress Syndrome1 more

Lung protection should start in the delivery room where, from the first breaths, the preterm infant can be helped to clear the lung fluid and to recruit alveolar spaces and establish the functional residual capacity (FRC). Sustained lung inflation (SLI) applied at birth in the delivery room has been demonstrated to lead to clearance of lung fluid and achievement of a precocious functional residual capacity (FRC) both in animal and human studies. SLI associated to an adequate positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) may help the efficacy of the respiratory effort in lung of preterm infants at risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and reduce need of mechanical ventilation (MV). Further studies are required to evaluate the clinical utility of this maneuver. The ability to monitor what happens to the lungs while applying different recruitment maneuvers in preterm infants would allow the definition of a procedure that allows optimal assistance to improve the FRC. One promising approach is provided by the forced oscillation technique (FOT). During forced oscillations, a small amplitude sinusoidal pressure stimulus is applied to the airway opening and the mechanical response of the respiratory system is studied by means of the total respiratory input impedance (Zin). Zin is a complex number that can be expressed as real part, called resistance (Rrs), and imaginary part, called reactance (Xrs). Particularly, it has been recently shown that Xrs measured at 5 Hz is very sensible to changes in the mechanics of lung periphery and provides accurate information about lung volume recruitment and derecruitment. The main purpose of this work is to apply FOT to the assessment of lung function in newborns submitted to SLI at birth. The investigators hypothesized that the application in the delivery room of the SLI in the preterm infant is effective in achieving a greater FRC and therefore a greater value of Xrs compared to a control group not treated with the SLI.

Withdrawn4 enrollment criteria

The Effect of Negatively Fluid Balancing Speed for ICU Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress...

Fluid Loss

Previous studies have shown that a positive fluid balance was an independent factor of worse prognosis in ICU patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and negative fluid balance has been demonstrated to increase oxygenation index, reduce time under mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay with no noticeable adverse effects. But there is no evidence that faster speed of negative fluid balance would be more beneficial for ARDS patients. So researchers designed the study to prove the effect of negatively fluid balancing speed for ICU patients with ARDS.

Unknown status4 enrollment criteria

Liberal Oxygenation Versus Conservative Oxygenation in ARDS

Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeIntensive Care

No clear recommendation exists for the level of oxygenation of intensive care patients. In Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), pulsed oxymetry (SpO2) have to be kept between 88 and 95 percent and oxygen alveolar pressure between 55 and 80 mmHg (PaO2). These recommendations are common but do not lie on high scientific knowledge and level of proof. In the major studies of these fifteen last years that changed ARDS management, PaO2 was kept around 85 and 90 mmHg despite current recommendations of 55 to 80 mmHg of PaO2. Many recent review and cohort studies pointed the risk of excessive oxygenation especially following cardiac arrest, stroke or traumatic brain injury. However, these data come in majority from cohort or database study without strong definition of hyperoxia. Data coming from prospective studies are scarce and tend to show better outcome of patients with lower objectives of oxygenation in ICU. High oxygen (O2) level may be deleterious especially on inflammatory lungs. It could enhance injuries due to mechanical ventilation. O2 could be responsable of " hyperoxia induced lung injury ". The investigators showed in a precedent study that comparing a restrictive oxygenation versus a liberal oxygenation was feasable and do not expose patients to major adverse events. More, mortality at 60 days has tendency to be lower. The investigators therefore ask if a lower objectives of PaO2 in comparison with the level usually seen in last studies on ARDS could improve ARDS patients outcome. The aim of this study is to show that a restrictive oxygenation in comparison with a liberal oxygenation strategy in patients with ARDS would lower mortality at 28 days.

Unknown status21 enrollment criteria

Effect of Intraoperative Fluid Restriction on Postoperative Outcomes in Video-assisted Thoracic...

Acute Lung Injury (ALI)Acure Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)1 more

The objective of this study is to compare the effects of two intraoperative fluid regimens - restrictive versus liberal (standard)- on postoperative outcomes (e.g. cardiopulmonary complications, morbidity, mortality and duration of hospitalization) in lung resections via Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).

Unknown status2 enrollment criteria

Two Strategies of RDS Treatment in Newborns With Birth Weight > 1500 Grams

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The purpose of this study is to compare two different treatment strategies for RDS in preterm infants > 1500 grams and evaluate whether a selective surfactant administration would reduce the need of intubation, mechanical ventilation and surfactant use.

Unknown status9 enrollment criteria

NHFOV vs NIPPV vs nCPAP in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Preterm Infant

This will be a prospective, multi-center, three-arms,parallel, randomized, controlled trial with a superiority design,conducted in China. The investigators conduct this multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial to test the hypothesis that NHFOV is more effective than nCPAP or NIPPV in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in infants with a gestational age of less than 30 weeks or a birth weight of less than 1500g when used as a primary noninvasive ventilation (NIV) mode.

Unknown status6 enrollment criteria

Pilot Study on Cytokine Filtration in COVID-19 ARDS

Coronavirus InfectionAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome1 more

Background: There are no proven therapies for COVID-19 infection. COVID-19 infects the respiratory epithelium of the lower airways, causing widespread damage via cytopathic effects, resulting in severe inflammation and Pneumonitis. High local and circulating levels of cytokines, or cytokine storm, can lead to capillary leak syndrome, progressive lung injury, respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: This is a pilot randomized, controlled, uni-center study testing safety and efficacy of cytokine filtration on patients with severe ARDS. Eligible patients will be randomized to 72 hours filtration or no filtration on top of the standard treatment for ARDS. Indications for randomization are patients with moderate or severe ARDS with need of ventilation support (either invasive or non-invasive), with inflammatory markers. The primary outcome will be days on mechanical ventilation (MV) support. Secondary outcomes are 30-day mortality, ICU days, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, duration of renal replacement therapy (RRT) and catecholamine therapies, hospital length of stay, multi-organ failure. All analysis will be done according to the intention to treat principle.

Unknown status15 enrollment criteria

A Study of the C3 Inhibitor AMY-101 in Patients With ARDS Due to COVID-19 (SAVE)

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Due to SARS-CoV-2 Infection (Severe COVID19)

The study is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind phase 2 clinical study of the efficacy and safety of AMY-101, a potent C3 inhibitor, for the management of patients with ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. We will assess the efficacy and safety, as well as pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD). The study will assess the impact of AMY-101 in patients with severe COVID19; specifically, it will assess the impact of AMY-101 1) on survival without ARDS and without oxygen requirement at day 21 and 2) on the clinical status of the patients at day 21.

Unknown status22 enrollment criteria
1...818283...122

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs