Active clinical trials for "Infarction"

This is a multicenter multidisciplinary study designed to investigate patient, provider, and system-related factors that are associated with the quality and safety of initial management for suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) evolving for less than 12 hours in daily practice. The primary hypotheses are that delayed reperfusion therapy for suspected STEMI independently relates to provider practice patterns and system barriers. It is further postulated that non-compliance with target delays in implementing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or fibrinolytic therapy is associated with worse in-hospital clinical outcomes. The secondary hypotheses are that the delivery of acute reperfusion therapy within target delays is associated with increased rates of false-positive cardiac catheterization laboratory activation, inadvertent fibrinolytic therapy, and bleeding events. The project will be conducted in three emergency medical services and 23 public and private (for-profit and non-for-profit) acute care hospitals in Northern Alps in France. Data over the index hospital stay period will be retrospectively collected for all the patients included in an ongoing prospective regional hospital-based clinical registry of suspected STEMI from October, 1st, 2002 to December, 31, 2014. Inclusion of 7435 patients is anticipated. In this observational retrospective study, no specific intervention is assigned to participants. All diagnostic testing, procedures, and medication ordering are performed at the discretion of attending physicians. No enrollment or follow-up visits are planned. The primary effectiveness outcome is timely acute reperfusion therapy. The secondary effectiveness outcomes include false-positive cardiac catheterization laboratory activation for catheterization candidates and inadvertent fibrinolytic therapy. The secondary medical outcomes include in-hospital all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and major bleeding events. Multivariable logistic regression model will be developed to identify baseline characteristics that are independently associated with timely acute reperfusion therapy. Propensity score analysis will be performed for comparing clinical outcomes between timely acute reperfusion therapy recipients and non-recipients.

The purpose of this study is To assess percutaneous coronary intervention 's effect on short- and long- term outcomes, and complication incidence in resuscitated victims of cardiac arrest after acute myocardial infarction

Rationale: Timely and effective reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is currently the most effective treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, permanent myocardial injury related to the ischemia and subsequent reperfusion is observed in the vast majority (88%) of patients and harbours a risk of heart failure development. Administration of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has been shown to protect the heart from "ischemia reperfusion injury" in various experimental models. Data in humans suggests that the H2S-releasing agent sodium thiosulfate (STS) can be administered safely. Objective: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of STS compared to placebo treatment on myocardial infarct size in patients presenting with STEMI and treated with PCI Study design: a multicenter, double blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 380 patients, aged 18 years and above, undergoing primary PCI for a first STEMI and deemed amenable, by the investigator, to be treated with STS 12.5g intravenously (i.v.) or matched placebo immediately after arrival at the catheterization laboratory (cath-lab) and a repeated dose administered 6 hours after the first dose, on top of standard treatment. Primary endpoint is infarct size as measured with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR-imaging) 4 months after randomization.

Changes in the ambient temperature (esp. warm to cold) as well as exercise are triggers for vasospasms and plaque rupture. Weather data (temperature, precipitation in general as well as snowfall and changes in atmospheric pressure) will be correlated with the incidence of myocardial infarctions.

The objective of Left atrial appendage closure compared to standard antiplatelet therapy in patients with AF who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (LLA-PCI) study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of implantation of left atrial appendage closure compared to standard antiplatelet therapy for prevention of thromboembolic events and stent thrombosis in subjects with AF who underwent PCI.

Registry of an interventional Study-proved Strategy (BIC-8) using Copeptin and Troponin for the Early Rule-Out of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) in Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and a low-to intermediate risk profile.

This trial will compare the procedural success rate between right and left radial approach in patients undergoing coronary angiography and coronary intervention.

The aim of this study is to compare circadian variability of antiplatelet effect of prasugrel and ticagrelor maintenance doses during the initial days after acute myocardial infarction.

FDA issued a Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) approval order for the AMPLATZER™ PIVSD Occluder (H070005) on January 10, 2017. The Conditions of Approval require that SJM conduct a post approval study to evaluate the safety and probable benefit of the AMPLATZER™ PIVSD Occluder.

A Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) is a questionnaire that asks patients for their views on their own health or the impact of healthcare they have received on their health and quality of life (RCN, 2011). The benefit of PROMS is that they gather information from the patient's perspective, which offers great potential to improve the quality and outcomes of health services (Department of Health 2011). There is a PROM (the PROMIS-10 Global Health) and a number of extra questions that are recommended for use in people who have had a stroke by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, but the best way of delivering these questions for stroke survivors is unknown. At present, the NHS in England, Scotland and Wales are required to offer every stroke survivors a 6 month post stroke follow-up appointment. Currently, the information collected at the 6 month review is not from the patient's perspective and the best method of collecting this information has not been established. The Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) which is led by the Royal College of Physicians in London promote the 6 month follow-up assessment. SSNAP recognise that currently 4 different methods of 6 month follow-up appointment occur. The current methods in use are face-to-face assessment, telephone interview, online questionnaire or postal questionnaire. The aim of this research is to understand if there is a difference between these 4 methods of delivering these questions in people who have had a stroke. As part of the 6 month review this research study will assess the response rate for 15 Patient Reported Health Status questions across the 4 recognised methods of delivery; Face-to-Face Telephone Online Post To conduct this research study a sample of 808 stroke survivors will be asked to take part in the research. From these 808 people, 202 participants will be randomly assigned to each method of administration (Face-to-Face Interview, Telephone Interview, Postal Questionnaire and Online Questionnaire). The questionnaires received by the research team will not record any personally identifiable information. The data will then be utilised by the researchers for statistical analysis in order to identify, which method of the 4 methods of administration, under investigation, is the most acceptable for stroke survivors. The conclusions of this research will inform the roll-out of the most appropriate method of delivering the 6 month stroke follow-up review for stroke survivors.