Active clinical trials for "Bacterial Infections"

Postoperative complications, especially bacterial infections, are relatively common and cause increased morbidity and mortality. Effective and timely antimicrobial treatment is important for prognosis, and delayed diagnosis and treatment substantially increase mortality. The early diagnosis of infection and sepsis are today based on diagnostic tests that have been available for years, like WBC count, SR and CRP. These markers suffer from several drawbacks; their sensitivity and specificity for infection and sepsis are not good enough and their kinetics are rather slow in terms of both increase and decrease. A major disadvantage of CRP is that after surgery and trauma this marker generally increases for several days, reaching a plateau typically on day 2-4 following the event, and therefore, in most cases do not offer the needed guidance for early treatment of bacterial infection. More recently, other biomarkers for infection and sepsis have become available, some of which appear acceptable for diagnostic use. Procalcitonin (PCT) and neutrophil CD64 are both promising new markers for the early detection of infection. They do both have their pros and cons compared to each other and compared to the traditional markers, such as CRP and WBC count. It is a general view that further research is needed before these markers will be accepted as part of the routine protocol for the diagnosis of infections, especially in relation to postoperative complications. The aim of the present study is to investigate the clinical utility of procalcitonin (PCT) and neutrophil CD64 as markers for infection and inflammation: to evaluate if it is possible to detect early phase postoperative infections by using these tests versus traditional markers such as CRP, SR and WBC count (with differential). to differentiate between systemic bacterial infection and systemic inflammation due to the surgical trauma. The hypothesis is that PCT and neutrophil CD64 are more sensitive and specific analysis for the early detection of infection after abdominal surgery than CRP (and other widely used tests for inflammation and infection), and that neutrophil CD64 is more specific than PCT. Patients admitted to the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Akershus University Hospital for elective abdominal surgery will be included in the study after informed consent. Initially consecutive series of 150 patients will be included, but this number may be increased depending on the number of observed infections during the course of the study. All patients will be monitored and treated by the formal protocol related to clinical signs of infection, such as abcess, peritonitis, pneumonia, sepsis and septic shock. In addition to the analytical parameters routinely used today in order to discover infections (CRP, WBC count etc), blood samples for PCT and neutrophil CD64 will be analyzed before surgery and daily during the stay at the hospital. In the case of signs of infection, locally or systemic, the frequencies of analysing PCT and CD64 will be increased according to the severity of the changes in the clinical condition. The expression of CD64 will be measured by flow-cytometry and PCT will be measured by an immunochemical method.

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) and properties of TR-700 into the pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar macrophages (AM) of healthy volunteers.

The purpose of this study is to discover how often certain bacteria are found in the rectum at the time of a prostate needle biopsy to diagnose prostate cancer. Certain bacteria are of importance because they can cause serious infection. Antibiotics that urologists commonly use to prevent these bacteria from causing infection are no longer effective. Many physicians around the world are noting increased infections with antibiotic resistant bacteria. Therefore; despite treating patients who are to undergo prostate biopsy with antibiotics, certain patients are being readmitted to the hospital with a serious infection. In order to study the incidence of these particular bacteria, the best method is to culture the bacteria at the time of the biopsy. This involves one rectal culture swab just prior to needle biopsy of the prostate. Once the incidence of these bacteria is known we may take steps to prevent the serious infections that occur as a result of prostate biopsy.

The aim of the study is to develop a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire measuring the impact of an acute exacerbation on daily lives of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This questionnaire will aim to detect an acute exacerbation and resolution of exacerbation from the patient's perspective. At a later stage of development, this questionnaire will be able to measure the effect of anti bacterials in the treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). This study will evaluate the factor structure, validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the GSK questionnaire in subjects who experience acute exacerbations of their COPD.

The main purpose of this monocentric, non-interventional, prospective study carried out in acute geriatrics (UGA) and post-rehabilitation care, is to determine if eosinopenia is associated with bacterial infections.

Ceftazidime-avibactam is used for treatment of invasive Gram-negative bacterial infections among critically ill patients, including those on continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration . However, dosing of ceftazidime-avibactam for these patients remains undefined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and avibactam among critically-ill patients, including those receiving CVVHD. This is a registration of Dr. Shields' exempt project under IRB approved research study STUDY19040363

No biological marker is highly specific of infection and currently available, especially for bacterial infection. The ideal marker would be easy to perform, rapidly, inexpensive, and correlated with the severity and prognosis of the infection. decreased in eosinophil count (EC) is unspecific of a particular clinical picture and may support a systemic inflammation, whereas the deeper the eosinopenia is, the darker is the prognosis in ICU. The duration of eosinopenia is not clearly documented, but it has been recently shown that EC tends to normalization, rapidly after appropriate and effective antimicrobial therapy in case of bacterial infection among adults patients hospitalized in a medicine ward. In the light of this findings, Terradas et al. described that EC returned back to normal between the day 2 or day 3 in survivors, indicating a potential interest as a predictive marker of the evolution among hospitalized patients. To the best of our knowledge, no work has studied eosinopenia as a prognostic marker of mortality during bacterial infections in the elderly patients in a hospital setting. Our study aims to evaluate the prognosis value of the EC in a geriatric unit of tertiary care hospital.

Respiratory infections such as colds, flu and pneumonia affect millions of people around the world every year. Most cases are mild, but some people become very unwell. Influenza ('flu') is one of the most common causes of lung infection. Seasonal flu affects between 10% and 46% of the population each year and causes around 12 deaths in every 100,000 people infected. In addition, both influenza and coronaviruses have caused pandemics in recent years, leading to severe disease in many people. Although flu vaccines are available, these need to change every year to overcome rapid changes in the virus and are not completely protective. This study aims to find and develop predictive tests to better understand how and when flu-like illness progresses to more severe disease. This may help to decide which people need to be admitted to hospital, and how their treatment needs to be increased or decreased during infection. The aim is to recruit 100 patients admitted to hospital due to a respiratory infection. It is voluntary to take part and participants can choose to withdraw at any time. The study will involve some blood and nose samples. This will be done on Day 0, Day 2 and Discharge from hospital, and an out-patient follow-up visit on Day 28. The data will be used to develop novel diagnostic tools to assist in rational treatment decisions that will benefit both individual patients and resource allocation. It will also establish research preparedness for upcoming pandemics.

Background: Infection of cardiac implantable electronic device including wound and pouch infection, bacteraemia and endocarditis is a common complication of device insertion. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of this complication is well established. Most centres in Israel currently prescribe antibiotics about 5 days following the procedure as well, though clear clinical evidence warranting this practise is lacking. Unnecessary antibiotic treatment can lead to adverse events including allergy, undesirable effects of the antibiotics, establishment of resistance to antibiotics among bacteria and further infections with resistant strains. Objective: The investigators hope to either establish evidence warranting use of post-procedural antibiotic treatment or refuting it. Methods: The investigators intend to recruit about 400 patients a year into both trial group and control group. The trial group will be treated with post-procedural antibiotics during 5 days, while the control group will receive no post-procedural antibiotics. The endpoints of the study will include infections related to the implantable device and proposed adverse effects of the antibiotics. The t-test will be performed in order to evaluate whether benefit exists concerning one of the groups.

The purpose of this study is to try to find out how critically ill patients receiving the antibiotic, ceftolozane-tazobactam, process it in their body. Investigators would like to study if the antibiotic concentrations during a dose of this antibiotic reaches the right concentrations necessary to kill the bacteria that is causing the infection. The process by which a drug travels through the body in blood, how it is broken down and removed by the body is called pharmacokinetics (PK). We can measure the PK by taking blood samples at specific times after the antibiotic is given. Investigators would like to do the study in patients receiving dialysis and patients who are not receiving dialysis. This information about how the antibiotic is processed in the critically ill patient is unknown and it is important to know whether the doses doctors give patients to fight infection are adequate. If antibiotic concentrations are low in the blood, it gives the bacteria an opportunity to become resistant to the antibiotic which can lead to the antibiotic being less effective against bacteria potentially exposing future patients with infections to a limited range of effective antibiotics. Patients will be consented, and given the antibiotic as prescribed. Blood samples will be taken from the drip that is already in the patients arm just as the antibiotic starts, at 15 and 45 minutes, at 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8 hours. Patients who are on dialysis will have the blood samples taken from the dialysis machine before the blood reaches the dialysis filter (same blood samples as the non dialysis patients) and also bloods samples taken after the filter at 45 minutes, 2 and 6 hours. Dialysis patients will also have 5 separate samples of ultrafiltrate taken (approximately 10mls) - ultrafiltrate is the waste product of the dialysis process. The total amount of blood will be 40mls which is equal to about 2 tablespoons. The dialysis patient will have 50mls of blood taken.Information about the patients ICU stay will also be recorded.