Active clinical trials for "Communicable Diseases"

The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of posaconazole on unboosted fosamprenavir pharmacokinetics, and vice versa, in healthy volunteers.A second objective is to determine the safety of combined use of fosamprenavir with posaconazole in healthy volunteers.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous CXA 101 and comparator in complicated urinary tract infection

This research study is being carried out to study a new way to possibly treat HIV. This agent is called a "Zinc Finger Nuclease" or ZFN for short. ZFNs are proteins that can delete another protein named CCR5. This CCR5 protein is required for certain types of HIV (CCR5 tropic) to enter into and infect your T-cells. T cells are one of the white blood cells used by the body to fight HIV. The most important of these are called "CD4 T-cells." Some People are born without CCR5 on their T-cells. These people remain healthy and are resistant to infection with HIV. Other people have a low number of CCR5 on their T-cells, and their HIV disease is less severe and is slower to cause disease (AIDS). Even with no detectable levels of HIV in the blood, HIV remains in some tissues in the body, primarily the gut tissue. HIV infects the CD4+ T-cells including in the blood and gut. The new treatment to be studied will involve removing white blood cell from the blood that contains CD4+ T-cells. The extracted CD4+ T-cells are then genetically modified by the ZFNs to be resistant to infection by HIV by removing the CCR5 gene from the surface of the CD4+ T cell where HIV enters the cell. Additional genetically modified cells are manufactured and then re-infused back into you. Researchers hope that these genetically modified cells will be resistant to infection by HIV and will be able to reproduce additional resistant CD4+ T-cells in your body. Laboratory studies have shown that when CD4+ T-cells are modified with ZFNs, HIV is prevented from killing the CD4+ T-cells. On the basis of these laboratory results, thre is the potential that ZFNs may work in humans infected with HIV and improve their immune system by allowing their CD4+ T-cells to survive longer. The purpose of this research study is to find out whether "zinc finger" modified CD4+ T-cells are safe to give to humans and find how "zinc finger" modified T-cell affects HIV.

To assess the efficacy and safety profile of co-administration of BMS-790052 and BMS-650032 for 24 weeks treatment.

The purpose of the study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of oral levofloxacin (an antibiotic) with that of oral lomefloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections in adults.

To compare the safety and the efficacy of tigecycline to vancomycin with aztreonam in treating hospitalized patients with complicated skin and/or skin structure infections.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical cure rate of ceftobiprole medocaril versus a comparator in the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. The study will also characterize the safety and tolerability of treatment with ceftobiprole medocaril in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Objectives: Primary To compare the sustained virologic response (SVR) of PEGIntron plus ribavirin among patients receiving 48 weeks versus 72 weeks of therapy (defined as undetectable HCV RNA level 24 weeks after discontinuing therapy). Secondary To evaluate the safety and tolerability PEG Intron in combination with ribavirin for treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC) infection in patients co-infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). To determine the early virologic response of patients receiving PEGIntron plus ribavirin at Treatment Week 24 Study Design: All qualifying patients will enter the treatment phase and be dosed as follows: Peginterferon a-2b 1.5mg/kg by subcutaneous route once weekly plus Ribavirin: 800 mg (400 mg bid) if body weight < 65 kg 1000 mg (400 mg a.m. and 600 mg p.m.) if body weight > 65 kg and < 85 kg 1200 mg (600 mg bid) if body weight > 85 kg and < 105 kg 1400 mg (600 mg a.m. and 800 mg p.m.) if body weight > 105 kg At Treatment Week 24, all participants with detectable HCV-RNA will be discontinued from treatment and followed for a Post Treatment period of 24 weeks. Participants with undetectable HCV-RNA values at Treatment Week 24 will be randomized to either: Group A: an additional 24 weeks of previously assigned Peginterferon a-2b + Ribavirin therapy, for a total of 48 weeks of treatment. Group B: an additional 48 weeks of previously assigned Peginterferon a-2b + Ribavirin therapy, for a total of 72 weeks of treatment. Study Population: 300 HIV infected adults with chronic hepatitis C infection who have not been treated previously with interferon therapy. Dosage and Administration: Peginterferon a-2b 1.5mg/kg by subcutaneous route once weekly plus Ribavirin: 800 mg (400 mg bid) if body weight < 65 kg 1000 mg (400 mg a.m. and 600 mg p.m.) if body weight > 65 kg and < 85 kg 1200 mg (600 mg bid) if body weight > 85 kg and < 105 kg 1400 mg (600 mg a.m. and 800 mg p.m.) if body weight > 105 kg Efficacy Evaluations: Laboratory analysis, liver biopsies, quality of life assessments, and changes in Peginterferona-2b and Ribavirin dosages will be obtained. Safety Evaluations: Assessment of laboratory evaluations vital signs incidence and severity of adverse experiences dose adjustments premature withdrawal for safety reasons progression of disease as measured by HCV viral load AIDS defining events

Therapeutic options for serious fungal infections are limited by intrinsic and acquired resistance to existing antifungal agents. For example, zygomycetes (such as Mucor spp.) are intrinsically resistant to voriconazole and caspofungin. Yet, the only available therapeutic option, amphotericin, is associated with significant renal toxicity, even in lipid formulations. Posaconazole is a new antifungal drug, not yet Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved, but which has excellent in vitro activity against some intrinsically resistant fungi such as the zygomycetes. The intent of this trial is to provide access to posaconazole to patients with serious fungal infections which are refractory to standard antifungal therapies or invasive fungal infections for which there are currently no effective therapies. Secondly, the drug will also be made available to patients with invasive fungal infections who: have experienced serious or severe toxicities while receiving standard antifungal therapies; have pre-existing renal dysfunction which precludes use of standard antifungal therapies; or are chronically immunosuppressed with a history of invasive fungal infections previously treated with posaconazole in other clinical trials, and who require oral antifungal suppressive therapy as maintenance treatment to prevent recurrence. This is a multicenter, open-label, non-comparative experimental treatment use protocol. The experimental treatment use protocol will provide the investigational medication posaconazole where no other drug is commercially available. Posaconazole is given as an orally or enterally administered suspension. The duration of therapy is at the discretion of the investigator. Safety assessments will include an electrocardiogram [ECG] (to ensure no QTc interval prolongation) performed at baseline and serum/urine pregnancy testing performed at baseline and every three months after initiation of therapy. Plasma concentrations will be obtained if there is evidence of clinical failure. No other tests will be performed specifically for the experimental treatment use protocol.

Superficial skin and soft tissue abscess are frequently managed by opening them up with a procedure called "incision and drainage". It is routine practice in the United States to place packing material inside the abscess cavity after opening them up, in order to promote better wound healing and limit abscess recurrence. However, this practice has never been systematically studied or proven to decrease complications or improve healing. Patients with wound packing usually return to the emergency room or practice setting for multiple "wound checks" and dressing/packing changes which lead to missed days from work or school and utilization of healthcare resources. This procedure can often be painful and may even require conscious sedation (and the risks entailed) especially in children. With rates of superficial skin and soft tissue abscesses on the rise, and emergency room resources being stretched, it is important to determine whether packing wounds is necessary or even advantageous to patients. This study is the first to systematically evaluate the efficacy of wound packing after superficial skin or soft tissue abscess incision and drainage in children. The investigators will be evaluating wound healing, complications, recurrence and pain associated with packing both short and long term. In addition, the investigators will also be evaluating the utility of bedside point-of-care ultrasound use in predicting the presence of pus inside the abscess cavity. This test may be useful to determine whether incision and drainage is necessary for an individual who has a skin infection that is suspicious for an abscess.