Active clinical trials for "Communicable Diseases"

The LIMIT-Study is a placebo-controlled, double-blinded randomized controlled trial designed to explore the efficacy of a carrageenan-based lubricant as a topical microbicide for preventing HPV acquisition. Individuals at high risk for infection (men who have sex with men, or MSM, and especially those with HIV) will be included in the trial. Participants will complete a self-administered baseline questionnaire during the enrollment visit, and follow-up questionnaires during all other six visits. The shorter follow-up questionnaires are intended to evaluate recent sexual behaviours and to corroborate the responses given during the baseline visit. These questionnaires will measure HPV risk factors, compliance, and monitor safety and tolerability of the gels. Between follow-up visits, participants will be asked to log into a secure web module at least once a week to answer questions on daily sexual activities, condom and study gel use, and adverse events. Individuals will be screened for eligibility over the telephone or in person and eligible men will attend an enrollment visit, where the nurse will obtain informed consent and instruct the participant on gel use. They will receive a one month's supply of gel and provide the first specimen. Random number sets will be assigned to the treatment and control gel. Each participant will be assigned an individual code, which will be used to match him to the study arm. Lastly, the nurse will provide details about HPV infection and advice about condom use and sexual health. HPV infection status will be measured using anal specimens at baseline (enrollment/time 0), and at all follow-up clinic visits (1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months).

prulifloxacin is not inferior to levofloxacin hydrochloride in treating acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection in chinese

This study is to evaluate the antiviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability of combination therapy with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) + vedroprevir (VDV) ± ribavirin (RBV) for 8 weeks in treatment-experienced adults with chronic genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and cirrhosis.

The Vancomycin Study is a multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial that will compare the proportion of deep surgical site infections within 6 months in patients treated with local Vancomycin powder compared to those treated without local Vancomycin powder at the time of fracture fixation.

The purpose of the study is to compare the safety of intravenous (IV) and/or oral 6-day 200 mg tedizolid phosphate with 10-day comparator in participants 12 to <18 years with cSSTI.

The primary objective of the PK Lead-in Phase of the study is to evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics (PK) and confirm the dose of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) fixed dose combination (FDC) in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected pediatric participants. The PK Lead-in Phase will also evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of 10 days of dosing of LDV/SOF FDC in HCV-infected pediatric participants. The Treatment Phase will be initiated by age cohort after confirmation of age-appropriate LDV/SOF FDC dosage levels. Participants from the PK Lead-in Phase will immediately rollover into the Treatment Phase with no interruption of study drug administration. The primary objective of the Treatment Phase is to evaluate the antiviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LDV/SOF FDC +/- ribavirin (RBV) for 12 or 24 weeks in pediatric participants with HCV. During screening, participants will receive placebo to match LDV/SOF FDC to assess ability to swallow tablets.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether MRX-I is as safe and effective as Linezolid in the treatment of adult patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the reconstitution of normal flora by a "stool transplant" from a healthy individual to a C. difficile-infected recipient, and has long been a successful approach to recurrent/refractory C. difficile. The purpose of this project is to generate a frozen FMT inoculum from well-screened healthy volunteer donors which can be used repeatedly, particularly in those who do not have a healthy intimate partner or other related donor. Delivery of FMT has been performed colonoscopically, by fecal retention enema, or by the nasogastric route. This study will evaluate the safety and secondarily the efficacy of a frozen inoculum administered by nasogastric tube vs administered by colonoscope. Subjects with recurrent/relapsing C. difficile infection (10 per group) will receive FMT via either: colonoscopy NGT The primary endpoint is assessment of safety as measured by clinical events (GI, procedural, systemic). Efficacy will be defined as a resolution of diarrhea off antibiotics for C. difficile, in the absence of a need for OTHER systemic antibiotics, i.e. resumption of a normal bowel status for the individual. Secondary efficacy endpoints include weight, subjective well-being and relative clinical improvement per standardized questionnaire, and subject qualitative assessment of, and satisfaction with, the transplant procedures. Subjects will be monitored for clinical safety by history and standard exams and the follow-up questionnaire as well as followed closely by phone and in person.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a Response Guided Therapy of boceprevir 800 mg dosed three times a day (TID) orally (PO) in combination with Peginterferon (either alpha 2b or alpha 2a) and Ribavirin in HIV/HCV genotype 1 infected patients that failed to previous HCV therapy.

Patients who have undergone lung transplantation are at an increased risk of developing chest infections due to long-term medication suppressing the immune response. In other chronic lung diseases such as cystic fibrosis (CF) and bronchiectasis, inhaled, nebulised mucolytic medication such as dornase alfa and isotonic saline are often used as part of the management of lung disease characterized by increased or retained secretions. These agents act by making it easier to clear airway secretions, and are currently being used on a case-by-case basis post lung transplantation. To the investigators knowledge, these agents have not been evaluated via robust scientific investigation when used post lung transplant, yet are widely used in routine practice. Patients post lung transplant must be investigated separately as they exhibit differences in physiology that make the clearance of sputum potentially more difficult when compared to other lung diseases. Lower respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of hospital re-admission post lung transplant. Therefore, this highlights the need for a randomized controlled trial. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of dornase alfa, compared to isotonic saline, in the management of lower respiratory tract infections post lung transplant. Investigators hypothesize that dornase alfa will be more effective than isotonic saline. The effect of a daily dose of dornase alfa and isotonic saline will be compared over a treatment period of 1 month. Patients admitted to hospital suffering from chest infections characterized by sputum production post lung transplant will be eligible for study inclusion. Patients will be followed up through to 3 months in total to analyze short-medium term lasting effect. Investigators wish to monitor physiological change within the lung non-invasively via lung function analysis whilst assessing patient perceived benefit via cough specific quality of life questionnaires. These measures will be taken at study inclusion and repeated after 1 month and 3 months. Day to day monitoring will be performed via patient symptom diaries, incorporating hospital length of stay and exacerbation rate. The outcomes of this study have the potential to guide clinical decision-making and highlight safe and efficacious therapies.