H5N1 With or Without Topical Aldara in Healthy Adults
Avian InfluenzaInfluenza ImmunisationPhase I randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 50 males and non-pregnant females, 18 to 49 years old, who are in good health and meet all eligibility criteria. This clinical trial is designed to assess the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of inactivated A/H5N1 influenza vaccine administered intradermally (ID) with topical Aldara or control cream as a 2-dose regimen. The vaccine will be administered using the MicronJet600(TM) device. Subjects will be assigned to 2 treatment arms (25 subjects per treatment arm). Group A will receive two doses of A/H5N1 IIV ID with pre-application of topical Aldara on Days 1 and 22. Group B will receive two doses of A/H5N1 IIV ID with pre-application of topical control cream on Days 1 and 22. The duration of this study will be approximately 20 months with patient participation duration approximately 7 months. The primary objectives of this study are: 1) to assess the safety and reactogenicity after 2 doses of A/H5N1 IIV vaccine containing 9 mcg HA per dose administered ID approximately 21 days apart with topical Aldara or control cream; 2) to assess the serum HAI antibody responses 21 days after receipt of the 2nd dose of A/H5N1 IIV administered ID at 9 mcg HA per dose with topical Aldara or control cream.
Safety and Immunogenicity of Fluzone® Quadrivalent Vaccine Administered to Healthy Children
InfluenzaThe aim of the study was to describe the safety and immunogenicity of a 0.5-mL dose (15 μg hemagglutinin [HA] per strain) of Fluzone Quadrivalent vaccine in children 6 to <36 months of age. Primary objective: To compare the rate of any fever (temperature ≥100.4 degrees Fahrenheit [38.0 degrees Celsius) following a 0.5-mL dose of Fluzone Quadrivalent vaccine to that following a 0.25-mL dose of Fluzone Quadrivalent vaccine during the 7 days after either vaccination (Dose 1 and Dose 2 combined) in participants 6 to < 36 months of age. Secondary objective: To compare antibody responses induced by a 0.5-mL dose of Fluzone Quadrivalent vaccine to those induced by a 0.25-mL dose of Fluzone Quadrivalent vaccine as assessed by geometric mean titer (GMT) ratios and seroconversion rate differences after the final vaccination in participants 6 to < 36 months of age. Other objectives: To describe the safety of 2 different dose levels of the 2016-2017 formulation of Fluzone Quadrivalent vaccine in participants 6 to < 36 months of age. To describe the immunogenicity of 2 different dose levels of the 2016-2017 formulation of Fluzone Quadrivalent vaccine in participants 6 months to < 36 months of age. To submit available sera from approximately 30 participants to the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research for further analysis by the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the FDA to support formulation recommendations for subsequent influenza vaccines.
Phase 3 Trial of Serbian Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
InfluenzaA Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a seasonal, trivalent, split, inactivated influenza vaccine produced by InstituteTorlak.
Safety and Immunogenicity of GPO Seasonal Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Thai...
InfluenzaThe study is aim to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of one dose (15 μg HA per strain per dose) of the GPO seasonal trivalent inactivated split virion influenza vaccine (Tri Fluvac) in healthy adults aged 18 to 49 years over 90 days post-injection.
Study to Assess the Immune Response and the Safety Profile of a High-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza...
Influenza (Healthy Volunteers)Primary Objective: Immunogenicity: To describe the immune response induced by high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV-HD) and AdimFlu-S (QIS) by hemagglutinin inhibition (HAI) measurement method in all participants. Safety: To describe the safety profile of all participants in each study groups.
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of KBP-V001 Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Healthy...
InfluenzaThis is an observer-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of TAP-V001 quadrivalent influenza vaccine in healthy adult subjects.
Universal Anti-Viral Vaccine for Healthy Elderly Adults
Virus DiseasesPneumonia6 moreThis protocol tests the safety and efficacy of a novel universal vaccine concept called "allo-priming" which is designed to protect elderly adults from progression of any type of viral infection, including possible protection against progression of the current outbreak of COVID-19 infection, and any future variants, strains, mutations of the causative SARS-CoV-2 virus as well as protection from any future currently unknown newly emergent novel viruses.
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals' Influenza Vaccine...
InfluenzaHumanStudy to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of H7N9 antigen in combination with full or half doses of AS03 adjuvant system in healthy adults.
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of a Modified RNA Vaccine Against...
InfluenzaHumanThis study will be divided into two substudies - Substudy A (SSA) and Substudy B (SSB) Substudy A This is a Phase 1 randomized substudy to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of monovalent influenza modRNA vaccine (mIRV) and bivalent influenza modRNA vaccine (bIRV) at various dose levels, and quadrivalent influenza modRNA vaccine (qIRV), in participants 65 to 85 years of age. Participants will receive at Vaccination 1 either: 1 of 4 dose levels of mIRV (either A or B Strain), 1 of 4 dose levels of bIRV (containing both A and B strains), qIRV (at 1 dose level), or A licensed quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV). At approximately 8 weeks following Vaccination 1, participants will be unblinded and QIV (Vaccination 2) administered to participants not having previously received this at Vaccination 1. Additionally, participants who previously received QIV at Vaccination 1 will receive one of the following for Vaccination 2: mIRV encoding A strain at dose level 4, or mIRV encoding B strain at dose level 4. Substudy B This is a randomized substudy to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the following vaccination schedules in participants 65 to 85 years of age: 2-Visit Schedules 2 doses of qIRV (at a dose level 1), administered 21 days apart. 2 doses of licensed QIV, administered 21 days apart (as a control group) A dose of licensed QIV following by a dose of bIRV encoding 2 A strains at dose level combination 1 or 2, administered 21 days apart. 1-Visit Schedules A dose of licensed QIV administered concurrently in the opposite arm with bIRV encoding 2 A strains at dose level combination 1 or 2. A dose of bIRV encoding 2 A strains administered concurrently in the opposite arm with a dose of bIRV encoding 2 B strains.at dose level 1. A dose of qIRV encoding 2 A strains and 2 B strains at dose level 2 (at one of two possible dose level combinations). A dose of qIRV encoding 2 A strains and 2 B strains at dose level 3. 1 dose of licensed QIV (as a control group). Substudy B In participants 18 to 64 years of age: -A dose of qIRV encoding 2 A strains and 2 B strains at a dose level combination 1 or 2.
Dose, Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of an Influenza H10 Stabilized Stem Ferritin Vaccine,...
InfluenzaBackground: The flu is a common viral infection that can be deadly for certain people. Vaccines against flu have been developed to teach the body to prevent or fight the infection. A new vaccine may help the body to make an immune response to H10 flu, a flu strain that infects humans. Objective: To test the safety and effectiveness of the H10 Stabilized Stem Ferritin vaccine (VRC-FLUNPF0103-00-VP or H10ssF-6473). Eligibility: Healthy adults ages 18-70, but not born between 1965-1970 Design: Participants received 1 or 2 vaccinations by injections (shots) in the upper arm muscle over 4 months. Participants received a thermometer and recorded their temperature and symptoms every day on/with/via a diary card for 7 days after each injection. The injection site was checked for redness, swelling, itching or bruising. Participants had 8-10 follow-up visits over 10 months. At follow-up visits, participants had blood drawn and were checked for health changes or problems. Participants who reported influenza-like illness had nose and throat swabs collected for evaluation of viral infection. Some participants had apheresis. A needle was placed into a vein in both arms. Blood was removed through a needle in the vein of one arm. A machine removed the white blood cells and then the rest of the blood was returned to the participant through a needle in the other arm.