Active clinical trials for "Influenza, Human"

This study is an open-label, single-center, randomized phase IV clinical trial of the SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine manufactured by Sinovac Research & Development Co., Ltd. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of concomitant administration of the SARS-CoV-2 Inactivated Vaccine (Vero cell) with Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in adults aged from 18 to 59 Years

To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of quadrivalent influenza virus split vaccine in healthy population aged 3-8 years following different immunization procedures.

This is a Phase 2, randomized, multi-center study in approximately 300 adults who received 2 doses of aH5N1c or placebo in and completed the parent study V89_18 in the <65 years of age cohort. The study investigates whether two priming doses of MF59-adjuvanted H5N1 cell culture-derived vaccine (aH5N1c) followed by one or two booster vaccinations with a MF59-adjuvanted H5N6 cell culture derived vaccine (aH5N6c) 3 weeks apart elicit immune responses to the antigens used for priming (H5N1) and boosting (H5N6) after first and second heterologous booster vaccination. Eligible subjects, who received 2 doses of aH5N1c in the parent study V89_18 are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either two aH5N6c vaccinations, 3 weeks apart (group 1) or an aH5N6c vaccination on Day 1 and saline placebo on Day 22 (group 2). Eligible subjects, who received placebo in the parent study will receive two aH5N6c vaccinations, 3 weeks apart (group 3). After the second vaccine administration, subjects are monitored for approximately 6 months for safety and antibody persistence. The total study duration will be approximately 7 months per subject.

Trial purpose is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and reactogenicity of the Vaccine for the prevention of infections caused by Haemophilus Influenzae Type b in volunteers aged 18-50.

In the current study, the study team will explore whether small incentives are effective at promoting flu vaccine uptake. The study is designed to compare the relative efficacy of incentives of equal perceived expected value (EV) or equal implementation costs, to assess whether people are more likely to get vaccinated in response to lotteries with very high payoffs than to small certain cash payout or slightly higher-probability, more moderate payoffs. In particular, given the potential appeal of official state lottery tickets, one study arm will receive a Pennsylvania scratch-off lottery ticket for getting a flu vaccine. A primary hypothesis is that lotteries will outperform simple reminders (encouraging respondents to get the flu shot at their upcoming appointment) and the standard of care, representing the ambient healthcare system and public health campaigns to increase vaccination.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of Ad26.RSV.preF-based vaccine and quadrivalent high-dose seasonal influenza vaccine when administered either concomitantly or separately.

The study the safety, reactogenicity and obtain preliminary data on the immunogenicity of Flu-M Quadro, 4-valent inactivated split influenza vaccine, in healthy volunteers

To trial the reactogenicity, safety and immunogenicity of the Flu-M inactivated split influenza vaccine in volunteers aged 18-60 years

Routine annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged≥6 months who do not have contraindications. For those aged 6 monthsthrough 8 years who have previously received ≥2 total doses of trivalent orquadrivalent influenza vaccine ≥4 weeks apart, they require only 1 dose ofinfluenza vaccine. For those who have not previously received ≥2 doses oftrivalent or quadrivalent influenza vaccine, they require 2 dose of influenzavaccine. but the evidence on how to select vaccine doses for quadrivalentinfluenza vaccine is limited in China. The study is a prospective, open-labelcomparison of the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of 1 versus 2 doses ofan inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine in subjects of 3-8 years old withdifferent history of influenza vaccination.

Comparative assessment of the tolerability, safety, and immunogenicity of the Flu-M® Inactivated Split Influenza Vaccine (without preservative) and the Flu-M® vaccine (with preservative) in volunteers aged between 18 and 60