Active clinical trials for "Influenza, Human"

This study will be divided into two substudies - Substudy A (SSA) and Substudy B (SSB) Substudy A This is a Phase 1 randomized substudy to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of monovalent influenza modRNA vaccine (mIRV) and bivalent influenza modRNA vaccine (bIRV) at various dose levels, and quadrivalent influenza modRNA vaccine (qIRV), in participants 65 to 85 years of age. Participants will receive at Vaccination 1 either: 1 of 4 dose levels of mIRV (either A or B Strain), 1 of 4 dose levels of bIRV (containing both A and B strains), qIRV (at 1 dose level), or A licensed quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV). At approximately 8 weeks following Vaccination 1, participants will be unblinded and QIV (Vaccination 2) administered to participants not having previously received this at Vaccination 1. Additionally, participants who previously received QIV at Vaccination 1 will receive one of the following for Vaccination 2: mIRV encoding A strain at dose level 4, or mIRV encoding B strain at dose level 4. Substudy B This is a randomized substudy to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the following vaccination schedules in participants 65 to 85 years of age: 2-Visit Schedules 2 doses of qIRV (at a dose level 1), administered 21 days apart. 2 doses of licensed QIV, administered 21 days apart (as a control group) A dose of licensed QIV following by a dose of bIRV encoding 2 A strains at dose level combination 1 or 2, administered 21 days apart. 1-Visit Schedules A dose of licensed QIV administered concurrently in the opposite arm with bIRV encoding 2 A strains at dose level combination 1 or 2. A dose of bIRV encoding 2 A strains administered concurrently in the opposite arm with a dose of bIRV encoding 2 B strains.at dose level 1. A dose of qIRV encoding 2 A strains and 2 B strains at dose level 2 (at one of two possible dose level combinations). A dose of qIRV encoding 2 A strains and 2 B strains at dose level 3. 1 dose of licensed QIV (as a control group). Substudy B In participants 18 to 64 years of age: -A dose of qIRV encoding 2 A strains and 2 B strains at a dose level combination 1 or 2.

The study comprises 3 parts: Phase 1/2, Phase 2 Northern Hemisphere (NH), and Phase 2 extension. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity, and humoral immunogenicity of mRNA-1010 vaccine.

Study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of H7N9 antigen in combination with full or half doses of AS03 adjuvant system in healthy adults.

This is a Phase II clinical trial in up to 420 males and non-pregnant females, 19 to 70 years of age, inclusive, who are in good health and meet all eligibility criteria. This clinical trial is designed to assess the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of one dose of a monovalent inactivated split influenza 2017 A/H7N9 virus vaccine (2017 A/H7N9 IIV), administered intramuscularly (IM) at 3.75 mcg hemagglutinin (HA) per dose, given with or without AS03 adjuvant to subjects primed with a monovalent inactivated split influenza 2013 A/H7N9 virus vaccine (2013 A/H7N9 IIV) in DMID Protocols 13-0032 and 13-0033, or to those who are A/H7 IIV-naïve. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) diluent will be used to achieve the targeted dosage. The study will be conducted at 9 Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU) sites (including their subcontractors). Study duration is approximately 17 months with subject participation duration up to 13 months. The primary objectives are: 1) to assess the safety and reactogenicity of 2017 A/H7N9 IIV given with or without AS03 adjuvant following receipt of one dose of study vaccine; 2) to assess the serum hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and neutralizing (Neut) antibody responses following receipt of the study vaccine.

This prospective annual release study is designed to evaluate the safety of 2 new influenza virus vaccine strains to be included in FluMist Quadrivalent for the 2018-2019 influenza season.

The purpose of this study is to elucidate efficacy and safety of influenza vaccine in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor.

This is a Phase I double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 50 healthy adolescents and children, 9-17 years of age, inclusive, who are in good health and meet all eligibility criteria. This clinical trial is designed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a prime-boost regimen of H3N2 M2SR intranasal influenza vaccine (manufactured by FluGen) followed by licensed inactivated Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) boost administered intramuscularly Subjects will be enrolled in one of two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Arm 1 will receive one dose of M2SR intranasally on Day 1 and one dose of QIV on Day 92. Arm 2 will receive one dose of placebo (saline) intranasally on Day 1, and one dose of QIV on Day 92. Study duration will be approximately 28 months with patient participation duration approximately 13 months. The primary study objective is to assess the safety and reactogenicity of a monovalent live attenuated influenza H3N2 M2SR vaccine.

This randomized, open-label, single-site study at Saint Louis University will enroll approximately 40 subjects who are healthy, 18 to 49 years old. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either licensed trivalent FluMist containing (2010-2011 season appropriate), or licensed inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (2010-2011 season appropriate) so that approximately 20 subjects will be randomized to receive LAIV, and 20 will receive IIV.

Background: Influenza, or "flu", is a very common infectious respiratory disease. Researchers want to develop a vaccine against flu. Vaccines teach the body to fight or prevent an infection. When the body learns to fight an infection, this is called an immune response. In this study, researchers want to test two new vaccines to help the body make an immune response to flu. Subjects received the vaccine injections in the upper arm muscle. One vaccine, the influenza HA Ferritin vaccine (HA-F A/Sing), was given to all subjects with a needle injection. The other vaccine, influenza DNA vaccine (DNA A/Sing), was given to subjects in Group 3 by a needle-free device that uses high pressure to push the vaccine through the skin and into the muscle. Objective: To test the safety and side effects of two new vaccines for prevention of H2 influenza (flu). Eligibility: Part I: Healthy adults ages 18-47 born after 1969. Part II: Healthy adults ages 18-70, but not born in 1966-1969. Design: Volunteers were tested for eligibility in a separate screening protocol. In Part I, all subjects received injections of HA Ferritin vaccine. These subjects were not expected to have H2N2 exposure based on their age and when H2N2 last circulated in the population. Five subjects in Group 1 received one injection of 20 mcg dose vaccine at Day 0 to test if it is safe. Then, five additional subjects in Group 2 received a total of two injections of a 60 mcg dose on Day 0 and 16 weeks later. In Part II, responses were evaluated from adults born before 1966 who may have prior potential exposure to H2N2 influenza as well as adults similar to those enrolled in Part I who are not expected to have H2N2 exposure. Also, Part II compared responses to 2 different vaccine regimens. Group 3 subjects received a DNA influenza vaccine prime at Day 0 and the HA Ferritin vaccine boost 16 weeks later. Group 4 subjects received the HA Ferritin vaccine 2 times, on Day 0 and 16 weeks later.

The live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is made up of weakened influenza viruses given into the nose and in early studies was shown to be better than the standard influenza vaccine at preventing infections in children. However, more recently, it has performed less well and it may also work less well in Sub-Saharan Africa. Not only do the investigators not know why this is, but the investigators also do not fully understand why LAIV produces stronger nasal antibody responses in some individuals but not others. Usually harmless bacteria that are present in participants noses can influence how our immune system works and variations in these may explain differences in how LAIV works. The project will recruit children given LAIV in the Gambia to gain further understanding of these issues. The investigators will measure a variety of responses to LAIV, including genes that can change their expression early after vaccination and use advanced computational techniques to identify new relationships between these genes and other LAIV responses. The investigators will also see whether nasal bacterial profiles in children who respond to LAIV are different from those who do not. In addition, the investigators will alter these bacteria in a subset of children with antibiotics and see whether this affects both nasal gene expression and later responses to LAIV.