search

Active clinical trials for "Intervertebral Disc Degeneration"

Results 241-250 of 415

Dynamic Stabilization Versus Fusion

Degeneration of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc

The purpose of this study is to compare posterior dynamic stabilization with fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease.

Completed8 enrollment criteria

rhBMP-2/CRM/CD HORIZON® Spinal System Pivotal Study

Degenerative Disc Disease

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rhBMP-2/CRM/CD HORIZON® Spinal System as a method of facilitating spinal fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease.

Completed15 enrollment criteria

Comparison of the Aspen Device Versus Pedicle Screws for Supplemental Posterior Fixation in Lumbar...

Degeneration of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the Aspen™ device compared to pedicle screw instrumentation for posterior fixation in the treatment of patients with degenerative disc disease and/or spondylolisthesis. The Aspen™ device will be compared to pedicle screw instrumentation in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement and success of fusion.

Completed30 enrollment criteria

Valeo OL Interbody Fusion Devices for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion SNAP Trial

Disc Degeneration of Pfirrmann Grade III or GreaterDegenerative Spondylolisthesis1 more

This study randomizes degenerative spondylolisthesis and/or degenerative disc patients into two groups: one to receive a new ceramic implant and a control group with a more traditional PEEK plastic implant. The procedure uses a single oblique cage in each group. The study will measure and compare pain and disability improvement with the two implanted devices over a period of two years. The fusion status will also be judged with plane x-rays and one CT scan.

Completed15 enrollment criteria

Actifuse ABX Versus INFUSE in Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion (PLIF) With Interbody Fusion...

Degenerative Disc Disease

The primary objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the success rates of Actifuse ABX and INFUSE in achieving bone fusion. The secondary objective of this clinical trial is to assess clinical outcome measurements.

Completed35 enrollment criteria

Actifuse ABX Versus INFUSE in Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion

Degenerative Disc Disease

This is a prospective randomised study. Primary objective: Evaluation of success rates of Actifuse ABX and INFUSE in achieving bone fusion. Secondary objectives: Assess clinical outcome measurements.

Completed35 enrollment criteria

Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of NUBAC™ Disc Arthroplasty

Degenerative Disc Disease

The NuBac device is indicated for reconstruction following nucleotomy in skeletally mature patients at least 18 years of age with symptomatic single level degenerative disc disease (DDD) at L4/L5 only. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with or without leg pain; with degeneration of the disc as confirmed by patient history, physical examination, radiographic studies showing: decreased disc height, contained herniated nucleus, vacuum phenomenon (dark disc) OR positive discography at the affected level. These DDD patients should have no more than Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level and should have failed at least six months of conservative, non-operative care. Demonstrate non-inferiority compared to ProDisc.

Completed36 enrollment criteria

A Prospective Study to Compare Bupivacaine and Exparel Versus Bupivacaine or Exparel Alone for Postoperative...

Low Back PainLumbosacral Radiculopathy6 more

The purpose of this study is to collect information about how patients feel when doctors manage their pain after lumbar spine surgery using a combination of EXPAREL® and bupivacaine injected into the lumbar spine at the end of surgery, compared to the patients that doctors use only EXPAREL® or bupivacaine to manage their pain. This information will help doctors determine which approach works best for patients who will receive surgery in their lumbar spine in the future.

Terminated13 enrollment criteria

Efficacy of the ATLAS Medical Device on Pain in Patients With Low Back Pain Due to Lumbar Disc Disease...

Lumbar Disc Disease

Monocentric, comparative, randomized, controlled interventionnal study in 2 parallel groups, aiming to compare the efficacy of the ATLAS device with that of a standard lumbar belt on the reduction of pain felt in patients with subacute or chronic low back pain with lumbar disc disease.

Terminated22 enrollment criteria

Eplerenone as a Supplement to Epidural Steroid Injections

Degenerative Intervertebral DiscsSciatic Radiculopathy1 more

Low back pain is a leading cause of disability and health care costs in the United States, and treatments are ineffective for many patients. Epidural steroid injections are a common treatment, but their efficacy has been questioned and for many patients they do not provide complete relief. The investigators hypothesize, based on preclinical studies, that lack of complete efficacy may be due to the fact that clinically used steroids activate not only the intended drug target, the glucocorticoid receptor, but also the pro-inflammatory mineralocorticoid receptor. To test this hypothesis, this pilot study will recruit patients scheduled for lumbar epidural steroid injections for degenerative disc disease, and randomize them to receive a concurrent treatment with oral eplerenone (a clinically approved antagonist of the mineralocorticoid receptor) or placebo for 10 days starting just after the epidural injection. At several time points during the following year, subjects will answer the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire, to report on both pain and functional outcomes.

Withdrawn16 enrollment criteria
1...242526...42

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs