Dynamic Stabilization Versus Fusion
Degeneration of Lumbar Intervertebral DiscThe purpose of this study is to compare posterior dynamic stabilization with fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease.
rhBMP-2/CRM/CD HORIZON® Spinal System Pivotal Study
Degenerative Disc DiseaseThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the rhBMP-2/CRM/CD HORIZON® Spinal System as a method of facilitating spinal fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease.
Comparison of the Aspen Device Versus Pedicle Screws for Supplemental Posterior Fixation in Lumbar...
Degeneration of Lumbar Intervertebral DiscThe purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the Aspen™ device compared to pedicle screw instrumentation for posterior fixation in the treatment of patients with degenerative disc disease and/or spondylolisthesis. The Aspen™ device will be compared to pedicle screw instrumentation in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement and success of fusion.
Valeo OL Interbody Fusion Devices for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion SNAP Trial
Disc Degeneration of Pfirrmann Grade III or GreaterDegenerative Spondylolisthesis1 moreThis study randomizes degenerative spondylolisthesis and/or degenerative disc patients into two groups: one to receive a new ceramic implant and a control group with a more traditional PEEK plastic implant. The procedure uses a single oblique cage in each group. The study will measure and compare pain and disability improvement with the two implanted devices over a period of two years. The fusion status will also be judged with plane x-rays and one CT scan.
Actifuse ABX Versus INFUSE in Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion (PLIF) With Interbody Fusion...
Degenerative Disc DiseaseThe primary objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the success rates of Actifuse ABX and INFUSE in achieving bone fusion. The secondary objective of this clinical trial is to assess clinical outcome measurements.
Actifuse ABX Versus INFUSE in Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion
Degenerative Disc DiseaseThis is a prospective randomised study. Primary objective: Evaluation of success rates of Actifuse ABX and INFUSE in achieving bone fusion. Secondary objectives: Assess clinical outcome measurements.
Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of NUBAC™ Disc Arthroplasty
Degenerative Disc DiseaseThe NuBac device is indicated for reconstruction following nucleotomy in skeletally mature patients at least 18 years of age with symptomatic single level degenerative disc disease (DDD) at L4/L5 only. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with or without leg pain; with degeneration of the disc as confirmed by patient history, physical examination, radiographic studies showing: decreased disc height, contained herniated nucleus, vacuum phenomenon (dark disc) OR positive discography at the affected level. These DDD patients should have no more than Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level and should have failed at least six months of conservative, non-operative care. Demonstrate non-inferiority compared to ProDisc.
A Prospective Study to Compare Bupivacaine and Exparel Versus Bupivacaine or Exparel Alone for Postoperative...
Low Back PainLumbosacral Radiculopathy6 moreThe purpose of this study is to collect information about how patients feel when doctors manage their pain after lumbar spine surgery using a combination of EXPAREL® and bupivacaine injected into the lumbar spine at the end of surgery, compared to the patients that doctors use only EXPAREL® or bupivacaine to manage their pain. This information will help doctors determine which approach works best for patients who will receive surgery in their lumbar spine in the future.
Efficacy of the ATLAS Medical Device on Pain in Patients With Low Back Pain Due to Lumbar Disc Disease...
Lumbar Disc DiseaseMonocentric, comparative, randomized, controlled interventionnal study in 2 parallel groups, aiming to compare the efficacy of the ATLAS device with that of a standard lumbar belt on the reduction of pain felt in patients with subacute or chronic low back pain with lumbar disc disease.
Eplerenone as a Supplement to Epidural Steroid Injections
Degenerative Intervertebral DiscsSciatic Radiculopathy1 moreLow back pain is a leading cause of disability and health care costs in the United States, and treatments are ineffective for many patients. Epidural steroid injections are a common treatment, but their efficacy has been questioned and for many patients they do not provide complete relief. The investigators hypothesize, based on preclinical studies, that lack of complete efficacy may be due to the fact that clinically used steroids activate not only the intended drug target, the glucocorticoid receptor, but also the pro-inflammatory mineralocorticoid receptor. To test this hypothesis, this pilot study will recruit patients scheduled for lumbar epidural steroid injections for degenerative disc disease, and randomize them to receive a concurrent treatment with oral eplerenone (a clinically approved antagonist of the mineralocorticoid receptor) or placebo for 10 days starting just after the epidural injection. At several time points during the following year, subjects will answer the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire, to report on both pain and functional outcomes.