Active clinical trials for "Intervertebral Disc Displacement"

This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thread-embedding acupuncture for treatment of lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (L-HIVD) by assessing pain, function, and quality of life.

Transforaminal epidural injection of treatments, commonly steroids (TFESI), is offered to people with sciatica and might improve symptoms, reduce disability and speed up return to normal activities (NICE guidelines) Imaging-guided TFESI has traditionally been performed in the sciatica context because injection is administered directly to the nerve root, which relieves the pain markedly; however, the maintenance time is usually short. Treatment with radiofrequency for pain management is in clinical use since decades primarily with nerve lesioning (thermoablation) once the specific pain tributary nerve is identified. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) with neuromodulation intention (not lesioning) has been shown to be effective in reducing some types of chronic pain, both degenerative and neuropathic. Pulsed radiofrequency has been also extensively used in the context of acute and subacute sciatica due to disc herniation without sufficient level of evidence. In a prospective RCT, comparing prf directed to dorsal root ganglia and Tfesi in patients with sciatica did not allow conclusions on efficacy because of limitations of the trial. In that trial, only few participants completed the study due to violation of trial protocol translating the results as not consistent. One retrospective trial, in which the use of Prf in addition to tfesi was evaluated in patients with acute and subacute sciatica, demonstrated rapid pain relief onset and prolonged maintenance; the overall efficacy was superior to that of the single method treatment (either tfsei or prf). The investigators conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial (Pulsed Radiofrequency in Addition to Tfesi for Sciatica [PRATS]) to determine if PRF in addition to TFESI leads to better outcomes in the management of patients with acute and subacute sciatica due to disc herniation, compared to TFESI alone.

This study was carried out to investigate the effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization in patients with lomber region disc herniation. 60 patients with lumbar disc herniation between the ages of 30-65 were included in the study. Following the evaluation, the patients were divided into two groups by closed envelope method; control group (n=30) and experimental group (n=30). In both groups, 4 weeks (20 sessions) hot pack (hotpack), conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), therapeutic physical therapy program with therapeutic ultrasound applications were performed. In addition to this program, Instrumental Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) was applied to the experimental group in 12 sessions of 3 times a week. This technique was performed by using stainless steel tools of different sizes and shapes. IASTM treatment was performed (including SWEEP-FAN-BRUSH-SWEEP technique, 45° angle with the skin, by 8-10 repetitions) for the ilicostalis lumborum, priformis, gluteus medius, erector spines, quadratus lumborum muscles, superficial and deep fascia. Depression levels of the patients were evaluated with Beck Depression Scale, before the treatment and after 4 weeks pain severity, VAS pain scale, functional status with Oswestry Scale, quality of life with Short Form-36 (SF- 36) and normal range of motion with goniometer. The results were analyzed by using SPSS v.20 program. In all analyzes, the significance ratio was accepted as p <0.05. At the end of the four-week treatment program, significant improvements were observed in VAS levels, normal joint movements (flexion, extension, right-left lateral flexion, rotation) in both groups (p <0.05). Oswestry and Beck Depression Scale scores showed significant improvement merely in the experimental group compared to the control group (p <0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS values, normal joint motion and Oswestry scale while there was no notable difference in SF-36 and Beck Depression Scale. As a result of the study, it was concluded that IASTM is a more effective method on normal range of motion and functionality in comparison with traditional physiotherapy program in patients with lumbar disc herniation and it can be used as an alternative method in patients during the physiotherapy and rehabilitation program if needed.

The aim of this research is to find and compare the effect of conventional physical therapy and ELDOA stretching exercise on pain, range of motion and disability in patients with cervical disc protrusion. The Randomized controlled trials done at Armed Forces Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rawalpindi. The sample size was 20. The subjects were divided in two groups, 10 subjects in conventional physical therapy group and 10 in ELDOA stretching exercise group. Study duration was of 6 months. Sampling technique applied was Convenient Sampling technique randomization in group through Lottery method (sealed envelope). Only 30-60 years individuals with cervical disc protrusion were included. Tools used in the study were measurement of ROM by bubble inclinometer, Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and neck disability index (NDI). Data was analyzed using SPSS 21.

This is a randomized controlled trial evaluation effect of postoperative rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of unsupervised home exercises compared to supervised physical rehabilitation. Secondary aims of this study are to determine if there is a difference in cost-effectiveness in patients undergoing supervised physical rehabilitation in patients after surgery for lumbar disc herniation compared to unsupervised home exercises.

Chronic neck pain is among the most frequently seen chronic painful conditions. As an important cause of disability, chronic neck pain is a musculoskeletal disorder that negatively affects quality of life. Cervical disc herniation is one of the leading causes of chronic neck pain and conservative methods such as exercise and pain medications are used first in the treatment. In patients unresponsive to conservative treatment, epidural steroid injection is successfully and frequently used treatment option. Epidural steroid injection in the cervical region can be applied with two approaches: interlaminar or transforaminal. Myofascial trigger point characterized by intramuscular taut band and hypersensitive spots is a condition in which central and peripheral sensitization play a role in the pathophysiology. There are underlying myofascial trigger points in many etiologies that cause chronic neck pain. Trigger points can increase the severity of pain and in some cases they can be the main factor in the etiology of pain. Therefore, the presence of myofascial trigger points should be investigated, even if another cause is detected in chronic neck pain. Dry needling is an easily applicable and effective treatment option in myofascial trigger point. Although it is well known that myofascial trigger points frequently accompany cervical disc herniation, their effect on treatment outcomes has not been investigated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of dry needling for trigger points on the treatment results of interlaminar epidural steroid injection in patients diagnosed with cervical disc herniation.

The treatment of chronic low back pain is a major objective of public healthcare, because it causes an important number of sick leaves. A correlation between clinical observations and an inflammatory discopathy has been underlined, but there is currently any reference treatment. In this study, the main objective is to assess the efficacy of an intradiscal injection of corticoids versus local anaesthetic on the treatment of pain of patients with low back pain associated to a Modic I discopathy.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of SI-6603 in lumbar disc herniation patients.

The purpose of this study was to compare standardized chiropractic treatment (spinal manipulation) to back surgery (microdiscectomy) for patients with sciatica secondary to lumbar herniated disc refractory to medical management.

The purpose of this study is to determine if participation in physical therapy in conjunction with a selective nerve root block in the lumbar spine is more effective than just receiving the injection alone for patients with low back and leg pain from a disk herniation (sciatica).