Active clinical trials for "Intraabdominal Infections"

Postoperative complications, especially bacterial infections, are relatively common and cause increased morbidity and mortality. Effective and timely antimicrobial treatment is important for prognosis, and delayed diagnosis and treatment substantially increase mortality. The early diagnosis of infection and sepsis are today based on diagnostic tests that have been available for years, like WBC count, SR and CRP. These markers suffer from several drawbacks; their sensitivity and specificity for infection and sepsis are not good enough and their kinetics are rather slow in terms of both increase and decrease. A major disadvantage of CRP is that after surgery and trauma this marker generally increases for several days, reaching a plateau typically on day 2-4 following the event, and therefore, in most cases do not offer the needed guidance for early treatment of bacterial infection. More recently, other biomarkers for infection and sepsis have become available, some of which appear acceptable for diagnostic use. Procalcitonin (PCT) and neutrophil CD64 are both promising new markers for the early detection of infection. They do both have their pros and cons compared to each other and compared to the traditional markers, such as CRP and WBC count. It is a general view that further research is needed before these markers will be accepted as part of the routine protocol for the diagnosis of infections, especially in relation to postoperative complications. The aim of the present study is to investigate the clinical utility of procalcitonin (PCT) and neutrophil CD64 as markers for infection and inflammation: to evaluate if it is possible to detect early phase postoperative infections by using these tests versus traditional markers such as CRP, SR and WBC count (with differential). to differentiate between systemic bacterial infection and systemic inflammation due to the surgical trauma. The hypothesis is that PCT and neutrophil CD64 are more sensitive and specific analysis for the early detection of infection after abdominal surgery than CRP (and other widely used tests for inflammation and infection), and that neutrophil CD64 is more specific than PCT. Patients admitted to the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Akershus University Hospital for elective abdominal surgery will be included in the study after informed consent. Initially consecutive series of 150 patients will be included, but this number may be increased depending on the number of observed infections during the course of the study. All patients will be monitored and treated by the formal protocol related to clinical signs of infection, such as abcess, peritonitis, pneumonia, sepsis and septic shock. In addition to the analytical parameters routinely used today in order to discover infections (CRP, WBC count etc), blood samples for PCT and neutrophil CD64 will be analyzed before surgery and daily during the stay at the hospital. In the case of signs of infection, locally or systemic, the frequencies of analysing PCT and CD64 will be increased according to the severity of the changes in the clinical condition. The expression of CD64 will be measured by flow-cytometry and PCT will be measured by an immunochemical method.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of doripenem treatment among Filipino patients with nosocomial pneumonia, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and complicated urinary tract infection.

With the rapid development of intensive care medicine, the mortality of patients with sepsis has decreased over the past decade, but it is still the leading cause of death in intensive care unit (ICU). As an important immune and metabolic organ, the liver plays a crucial role in host defense against invading pathogens and endotoxins, as well as maintenance of metabolic and immunological homeostasis. Some studies indicate that sepsis-associated liver dysfunction (SALD) has a substantial impact on the severity and prognosis of sepsis. Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are the second leading source of infection for sepsis after pneumonia in ICU, and are often related to high morbidity and mortality rates. Studies had found that the incidence of SALD in IAI patients was considerably higher than that of general population with sepsis. Moreover, the incidence of acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) in IAI patients was also much higher than that in sepsis patients with other site infections, as well as the degree of AGI was more serious according to guidelines proposed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) in 2012. IAI can directly cause AGI, and a subset of patients usually progress to increased intra-abdominal pressure, which further aggravates AGI. The pathogenesis of SALD remains unclear so far, and its mechanism is complicated and elusive. Nevertheless, the unique anatomical structure of the liver make it has close association with the gut, growing evidence indicates that the gut microbiota and related metabolites are related to several liver disease. In case of sepsis, gut microbiota disorder and low microbial diversity can cause severe liver injury. An important mechanism for this phenotype is the gut-liver axis, which refers to gut microbial metabolites and nutrients are transported to the liver through the portal vein and hepatic artery to maintain the healthy metabolism of liver. Therefore, we initially conducted a retrospective study to investigate the relationship between the occurrence of AGI and SALD among IAI patients. Subsequently, a prospective study was performed to analyze and compare the diversity and composition of gut microbiota in IAI patients with or without SALD, respectively, and the dynamic changes in the gut microbiota during the first week after ICU admission were also investigated.

The primary objective of this study is to identify any changes on the safety profile of adverse events and serious adverse events. And the secondary objective is to evaluate clinical response in the clinically evaluable population at test-of cure (TOC) or at the end of treatment (EOT) assessment, and microbiologic response at the subject level, if available.

This is a study to evaluate the safety of tigecycline in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) and complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI) under real practice in the usual hospital setting and patients' conditions, in order to assess the "real incidence" of adverse events related with tigecycline in these patients.

The purpose of this study is to collect post-marketing information on the safety of Tygacil in Filipino patients.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound derived variables in prediction of success of weaning from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients with abdominal sepsis

Understudied drugs will be administered to children per standard of care as prescribed by their treating caregiver and only biological sample collection during the time of drug administration will be involved. A total of approximately 7000 children aged <21 years who are receiving these drugs for standard of care will be enrolled and will be followed for up a maximum of 90 days. The goal of this study is to characterize the pharmacokinetics of understudied drugs for which specific dosing recommendations and safety data are lacking. The prescribing of drugs to children will not be part of this protocol. Taking advantage of procedures done as part of routine medical care (i.e. blood draws) this study will serve as a tool to better understand drug exposure in children receiving these drugs per standard of care. The data collected through this initiative will also provide valuable pharmacokinetic and dosing information of drugs in different pediatric age groups as well as special pediatric populations (i.e. obese).

Protocol Synopsis Protocol title: Assessment of peritoneal immune response in patients with severe intra-abdominal sepsis managed by laparostomy and VAC Purpose: Assessment of peritoneal immune response in patients with severe intra-abdominal sepsis Design: Prospective, single-center study Patient Population: Male or female adults (>18 years) with severe intra-abdominal sepsis No. of Subjects: 60 patients divided into two groups, 30 patients with severe intra-operative sepsis and 30 patients without sepsis scheduled to undergo major abdominal operations (middle line incision>15cm). The study is estimated up to 2 year to enroll Duration of Follow-up: Follow-up will be performed daily while hospitalized, until patient discharged or deceased. Endpoints: To measure the peritoneal cytokines levels in patients with severe intra-abdominal sepsis. To correlate the cytokines levels in the abdominal cavity and the serum plasma. To correlate cytokines response in serum plasma and peritoneal fluid with mortality and morbidity. To compare cytokines results in serum plasma and peritoneal fluid between patients with severe intra-abdominal sepsis and patients undergoing major laparotomy without sepsis. To assess the microbial load in the abdominal cavity in patients with severe sepsis. To assess the biofilm formation in VAC polyurethane sponge.

Secondary Data Collection Study; safety and effectiveness of Tigecycline .under Japanese medical practice