Active clinical trials for "Macular Edema"

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of monotherapy with anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (ranibizumab or bevacizumab) with combined therapy with anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and end-point-management grid laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Study design: Open-label non-randomized interventional study. Study overview: This study aims to look at the efficacy of treating diabetic macular edema (DME) with either anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor(anti-VEGF) monotherapy, compared with combination therapy with anti-VEGF and End-Point-Management (EPM) grid laser photocoagulation, over a period of 6 months. Various sites from across Asia (Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong) will participate. Depending on the availability of EPM laser, sites can either contribute to the 'Anti-VEGF monotherapy' arm, or to the 'Combination therapy' arm.

This study is aimed to compare the effect of combined intravitreal Bevacizumab and Fasudil injection with Bevacizumab only injection in patients with persistant macular edema secondary to ratinal vein occlusion. Methods: In this study patients with retinal vein occlusion patient who had at least three or more intravitreal AntiVEGF injection with persistence of macular edema at funduscopic examination is recruited. The eligible patients in randomized in two groups "Bevacizumab" and "Bavacizumab + Fasudil" and in injected intravitreally for 3 times monthly. In "Bevacizumab+Fasudil" group patients receive two injections at each session Bavacizumab and Fasudil. In "Bevacizumab" group patients receive only Bevacizumab. The patients are followed for 6 months and central macular thickness and visual acuity is measured at baseline and monthly for 6 month. Baseline ancillary exams include Fluorescein Angiography and OCT-Angiography which is performed at the final exam as well. Patients needing any therapeutic intervention is addressed during the 6 month follow up period.

This study will examine potential factors in the aqueous humor that may contribute to the development or progression of macular edema or fibrosis (due to any underlying disease) in patients suffering from these conditions.

Diabetic macular edema refers to swelling (fluid accumulation) in the center of the retina. The retina is like the film of a camera and is located in the back of the eye. This condition can develop in diabetics where swelling results from leaking of fluid from the blood vessels of the eye, into the center of the retina, the macula. If left untreated, this can affect central. The current standard treatment for diabetic macular edema includes medications injected directly into the eye (intravitreal injections) and laser eye treatment. The drugs that are injected directly into the eye are known as anti-VEGF agents which help to reduce the leaking. This includes bevacizumab (Avastin®) and ranibizumab (Lucentis®). However, some patients do not respond well to these anti-VEGF treatments and will be given the option of switching to an another newer anti-VEGF medication, called aflibercept (Eylea®) that is approved to treat DME. A recent large study has demonstrated that aflibercept was as efficacious as other anti-VEGF therapies listed above and was even superior in patients with worse vision (Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network, Wells JA, Glassman AR, et al. Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema. N Engl J Med. 2015:150218140025008-150218140025008). The purpose of this study is to determine what factors affect the treatment response to aflibercept (amount of swelling reduction) for patients with diabetic macular edema, who were previously unresponsive to ranibizumab injections.

Phase I/II study with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide microspheres(RETAAC)for treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema unresponsive to laser photocoagulation. Study hypothesis is that single intravitreal injection of RETAAC is safe and efficient compared to conventional treatment. Fifty patients will participate in this study and will be randomized into treatment and observation groups. Efficacy will be evaluated by best corrected visual acuity and macular thickness measured by optic coherence tomography (OCT) after 12 months of treatment.

Intravitreal triamcinolone has been effective for central macular thickness reduction and concomitant visual acuity improvement in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). VEGF is a very effective inducer of permeability, being 50.000 times more potent than histamine, and may exert its effect on retinal vascular permeability by altering tight-junctions proteins, such as occluding and VE-cadherin. Based on these principles, there is a rationale for anti-VEGF agents treatment of increased retinal capillary permeability conditions, such as diabetic macular edema. Therefore, we conducted a randomized, prospective study to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and intravitreal bevacizumab injection for refractory diffuse DME.

to compare the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab alone or in combination with triamcinolone acetonide with laser photocoagulation on clinically significant macular edema (CSME)

Observe the safety and tolerability of the single and multiple doses of 601 in DME patients; study the pharmacokinetic characteristics of single and multiple doses of 601, Observe the Preliminary efficacy of 601 multiple injections with different doses in the treatment of patients with DME.

To evaluate the efficacy of sequential therapy with intravitreal dexamethasone implant followed by bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab monotherapy for macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

This study is a multi-center, open, multiple-dose phase Ib/IIa clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of BAT5906 injection in patients with diabetic macular edema. BAT5906's phase I study on w-AMD shows that it is safe from 0.3-4.0 mg, and the higher dose (2.5 mg and 4 mg) may maintain the effect for longer; the same target drugs (such as brolucizumab and Abecip ) It has also been found in clinical studies that high doses can extend the dosing interval and reduce the dosing frequency. Therefore, in this study, two safe and effective doses were selected, and the optimal clinical effective dose and frequency of BAT5906 in DME were initially explored.