Genicular Artery Embolization Vs Observation for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee OsteoarthritisDegenerative Joint Disease of KneeThe purpose of this clinical trial is to determine whether genicular artery embolization (GAE) is an effective way to treat knee pain from osteoarthritis. Pain from arthritis is often due to underlying inflammation in the joint. The inflammation is associated with increased abnormal blood flow going to the specific area of pain. If the investigator can reduce the blood flow, the inflammation can be reduced and the pain can be controlled. The GAE procedure is an experimental procedure to decrease the blood flow (embolize) to the specific region of the knee that is causing the pain. This will be done by infusing microscopic spheres into the specific blood vessel (genicular artery) supplying the area of pain in the knee. This is done through a procedure which is called an angiogram, which is done entirely through a pinhole at the creased of the thigh, using twilight (conscious) sedation. The investigators have already completed an initial trial at UCLA, and shown that this procedure is safe and effective. The purpose of this new trial is to compare outcomes of people undergoing the GAE procedure to those who do not undergo the procedure. A total of 100 patients will be enrolled, and 2/3 of the patients will be randomly selected to undergo the GAE procedure. 1/3 will not undergo the procedure. This is known as a randomized trial. During the trial, all subjects will also get MRIs and fluid withdrawn from their knee joints at various timepoints in order to precisely figure out how the procedure works on a closer (microscopic) level.
G7 Acetabular System With Vivacit-E or Longevity Liner PMCF Study
Total Hip ArthroplastyDegenerative Joint Disease of Hip8 moreThe main objectives of this study are to confirm the long-term safety, performance, and clinical benefits of the G7 Acetabular Shells when used with the Vivacit-E and Longevity HXLPE liners and instrumentation in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.
Comparison Between Platelet-rich Fibrin and Steroid for Intra-articular Injection for Sacroiliac...
Low Back PainLow back pain is one of the commonest complaints nowadays affecting nearly 20% of the population, Sacroiliac joint has been accused of being the primary cause of pain in about 10%: 27% of this population. The sure diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain is challenging because of multiple crossed factors of facet joint pain and intervertebral disc pain. Diagnosis can be done by history taking, local examination, imaging techniques, and controlled local anesthetic blocks. Controlled local anesthetic blocks are diagnostic and therapeutic done by various methods either landmark-guided or imaging-assisted either by fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MRI), or ultrasound-guided. Lower cost, real-time viewing of needle leading to higher accuracy rate, and low ionizing radiation dose are favoring ultrasound-guided injection over other modalities. Numerous treatment modalities are being used for sacroiliac joint pain ranging from physiotherapy and systemic analgesics like Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to minimally invasive intra-articular, periarticular injection, radiofrequency neurotomy, and surgical fusion of the joint. Multiple injectates are being used for intraarticular injection most commonly local anesthetics and steroids which offer short-term symptomatic relief and delay the degenerative process. The need for a longer duration effect directly affects the disease process itself aiming for accelerating the joint healing rate by biological growth factors found in human blood especially in platelets. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been used aiming to inject a high concentration of growth factors directly into the joint. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), the second generation of platelet-rich plasma is now tried having the advantage of a simpler preparation and higher values of growth factors.
Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Elective TKA- Multi-center Trial
Arthropathy of KneeAntibiotic ProphylaxisThe Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Elective Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA): Multi-Center Trial is a study that will compare the effectiveness of various perioperative strategies for antibiotic delivery as prophylaxis for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) and surgical site infection in elective primary TKA. The investigators hypothesize that a single dose of prophylactic antibiotic administered within 60 minutes before the incision is not an effective way to prevent PJI in elective primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The investigators also hypothesize that the prolonged delivery (24 hours) of antibiotic prophylaxis after surgery does not further reduce the incidence of PJI in elective primary TKA. Duke University is the only site recruiting both primary total knee arthroplasty and unilateral knee arthroplasty.
Adding Core Stabilization Training to Manuel Therapy in Temporomandibular Disorders
Temporomandibular DisordersTemporomandibular Joint DisordersPrimary aim of this study is to determine whether core stabilization training in addition to orofacial manual therapy is more effective on Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) symptoms than orofacial manual therapy alone in patients with TMD. These secondary aim is to determine the effectiveness of orofacial manual therapy on TMD symptoms in patients with TMD. Patients will be treated for 10 sessions once a week, for a total of 10 weeks. Evaluation was planned to be done twice, at the beginning and end of the treatment.
iFuse TORQ for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Sacroiliac Joint DysfunctionSacroiliac; Fusion2 moreSTACI is a prospective, multicenter, study of SIJ fusion using the iFuse TORQ implant system.
Conservative Therapies in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders
Temporomandibular Joint DisordersTemporomandibular Joint Pain2 moreThe present study was designed to compare the effects of the mixed occlusal device using the simplified technique and the low-intensity laser alone or in combination in patients with temporomandibular disorders. A total of 96 patients will be selected after the diagnosis of TMD according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorder (DC/TMD), axis I. Patients will be randomly divided into three groups: Occlusal Device (N=32), Laser (N=32) =32) and Occlusal Device and Laser (N=32). Patients undergoing therapy with a stabilizing plate made using the simplified technique will be instructed to use the device every night while sleeping for four weeks. Photobiomodulation will be applied with low-intensity laser at predetermined points and at specific trigger points identified during the clinical examination (3 J/cm2) once a week for four weeks. The intensity of pain will be classified using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Mandible function will be assessed by maximum unassisted mouth opening. The impact of therapies on oral health will also be evaluated through the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) instrument in a simplified form. The ANOVA test will be used to compare the results obtained between the study groups, while the Repeated Measurements Anova test complemented by the Tukey test will be used for longitudinal evaluation of the data within each group.
Effect of Exercises on Convergence Insufficiency in Individuals With Temporomandibular Disorders...
Temporomandibular DisorderTemporomandibular Joint Disorders2 moreTemporomandibular Disorder is a disorder that involves the muscles of mastication, the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and associated structures. Convergence insufficiency (CI) is characterized by the inability of the eyes to perform the eye adduction movement together, to focus on a nearby object. Studies show that there is a relationship between the presence of TMD and its signs and symptoms in patients with convergence insufficiency. Given this, the research question of this clinical trial is whether the effect of oculomotor therapy would be effective in improving the signs and symptoms of Temporomandibular Disorder. The design of this research is a Clinical Trial, Randomized and Blind. It will be divided into two moments: evaluation and intervention. The evaluations will be carried out using the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Fonseca Anamnestic Index (IAF), Clinical Protocol and Assessment Instruments (DC/TMD), Mandibular function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ), Numerical Pain Scale (END), Convergence Test, Meersseman Test and Convergence insufficiency symptom Survey (CISS). Individuals will be randomized into 2 groups: Group A (Treatment for Temporomandibular Disorder) and Group B (Treatment Oculomotor plus Treatment for Temporomandibular Disorder). Both groups will receive physiotherapeutic treatment for 12 weeks. Patients will be reassessed shortly after treatment, 3 and 6 months later. For data analysis, the statistical significance considered will be p<0.05.
Safety of Ibuprofen After Major Orthopaedic Surgeries
PainAcute7 moreSafety of an eight-day treatment with ibuprofen after primary hip and knee arthroplasties.
Mandibular Muscle Energy Technique in Patients With Mandibular Joint Pathology and Bruxism
Temporomandibular Joint DisordersBruxism2 moreThis is a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. The main objective is to evaluate the immediate effect of the mandibular muscle-energy technique on pain, functionality and kinesiophobia in subjects suffering from temporomandibular dysfunction and bruxism. In the experimental group the jaw muscle-energy technique will be applied and in the control group a placebo technique will be applied. The intention is to see the immediate effects of the intervention and two evaluations of the pre- and post-intervention outcome variables and a follow-up of kinesiophobia one week later will be performed.