Active clinical trials for "Keloid"

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the 532nm potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser in comparison with the 595nm pulsed-dye laser (PDL) for the treatment of fresh surgical scars.

To evaluate the effectiveness of RXI-109 in reducing the recurrence of keloid formation following elective keloid excision.

The objective of the study is to actively gather additional information on safety, device performance and possible emergent risks following the use of Celotres in a post-market setting when used to reduce the recurrence rate, volume, appearance and/or symptoms associated with keloid scarring in subjects undergoing surgical excision of keloids as compared to the scientific literature.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of calcium electroporation on keloids.

Summary: Keloids and hypertrophic scars are benign fibrous growth, differing mainly by overgrowth beyond the initial defect in keloid whereas hypertrophic scar is confined to initial lesion and tends to regress over the years. Keloids and hypertrophic scars mainly lead to cosmetic disfigurement and functional deformity depending on site of involvement, in addition to symptoms like pain and pruritus, encountered occasionally. These sometimes might lead to psychological impact too. Different treatment options for keloids and hypertrophic scar are silicone gel/ sheets, corticosteroids, cryotherapy, lasers, antineoplastic agents (5-FU, mitomycin-C), surgical excision and immunomodulators (imiquimod) used either as monotherapy or combination therapy. Different studies involving combination of TAC and 5-FU have been done so far which shows better treatment outcome in terms of efficacy and safety. In a recent meta-analysis published in 2017 concluded that combination therapy of 5-FU + TAC offers better outcome than TAC alone, however recommended additional randomized, controlled, large-sample, high quality trial are needed for a more objective analysis of the treatment efficacy and to assess the adverse reaction associated. We are conducting this study the objective to compare the efficacy and safety profile of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide alone and its combination with 5-FU of the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. This study may help in finding out the optimum treatment option in keloid and hypertrophic scar with minimal side effects in our clinical practice.

The objective of the study is to evaluate the initial safety and efficacy of MF-4181, a hydrogel scaffold, in the reduction of the volume, appearance, and/or symptoms associated with keloid scarring in subjects undergoing surgical revision of keloid scars.

This trial will assess the safety and efficacy of 50 and 200ng Juvista per linear cm of wound margin administered by intradermal injection following the excision of keloid scars on the ear lobe. Ear lobe keloids commonly occur after ear piercing and can be particularly distressing for patients as they are very difficult to conceal and are usually bilateral. As the recurrence rate and growth rate of keloids can vary significantly between individuals, trial subjects will have bilateral ear lobe keloids and will act as their own control. One ear lobe will be treated with Juvista following keloid excision and one with placebo.

This is a split-scar study with a target sample size of 20. There are two interventions: fractional erbium:YAG-assisted drug delivery of 5-fluorouracil and fractional erbium:YAG-assisted drug delivery of triamcinolone acetonide. Patients will undergo treatments in a series of 4 treatments at approximately 4 week ± 1 week intervals. Investigators will monitor for safety and continued benefit after the end of the interventional treatment.

The objective of this study is to observe the potency of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSC) and umbilical cord-derived conditioned medium (UC-CM), or triamcinolone acetonide (TA) in keloid therapy, measured by the decrease in the type 1:3 collagen ratio and the increase of IL-10 levels carried out using CONSORT statement.

A Phase II prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled and comparative clinical study evaluating hydrogel scar-management modalities for effective management of hyperproliferative scars and keloids. This is a double-blinded study, which means that neither the evaluating physician nor the subject will know which treatment is administered. Group selection and assignment will be made at random, with a 2 in 5 chance of receiving a market-approved therapy, and 1 in 5 chance of receiving the placebo. Subjects assigned the placebo-moisturizer will receive a standard hypoallergenic dermatological hydrating cream base. Subjects assigned the silicone gel, will receive a commercially available, active comparator.