Active clinical trials for "Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca"

The purpose of this study is to determine efficacy and safety of Haporine-S eye drop for the patients with moderate to severe dry eye disease in a multicenter phase III clinical trial.

This is a multicenter, randomized, parallel group, investigator-masked, non-inferiority study. Approximately 84 subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio.The primary objectives of this investigation are to show that the performance of CBL-102 Eye Drops is non-inferior to that of Vismed® Multi eye drops in subjects with moderate to severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca after 28 days, and to assess the safety of CBL-102 Eye Drops during a 90-day period with treatment administered 3 to 6 times per day. The primary performance endpoint for this study is the mean change from baseline (CFB) in the study eye at Visit 4 (Day 28 ± 3 days) in ocular surface fluorescein staining score.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate how treatment with Intra-Nasal Mechanical Stimulation (INMEST) in the nasal cavity in patients with Keratoconjunctivitis sicca can relieve these symtoms.

The aim of the current study is to examine the contribution of intense pulsed light (IPL) for relieving signs and symptoms of dry eye due to meibomian gland dysfunction. The effect of IPL will be examined in a study designed as a randomized controlled trial. In the study arm, subjects will undergo 4 treatment sessions, consisting of IPL pulses immediately followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX). In the control arm, subjects will undergo the same treatments, except that the IPL pulses will be disabled. For each subject, the duration of the study will be 10 weeks, as explained in the detailed description.

To evaluate the tolerability and preliminary efficacy of Brimonidine eye drops (with and without corticosteroid eye drops) for the treatment of Dry Eye Disease (DED).

This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SJP002 ophthalmic solution compared to placebo in patients with Dry Eye Syndrome.

This is a phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OmegaD softgels for the treatment of dry eye disease. A daily dose of 2 OmegaD softgels dosed orally BID will be compared to 2 placebo softgels dosed orally BID for 84 days. Approximately 164 subjects will be evaluated for their signs and symptoms of dry eye disease and for safety throughout the study.

The primary objectives of this investigation are to show that the performance of CBL-101 Eye Drops is non-inferior to that of Vismed® Multi eye drops in subjects with moderate to severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca after 28 days, and to assess the safety of CBL-101 Eye Drops during a 90-day period with treatment administered 3 to 6 times per day.

The aim of this study is to compare ocular symptoms and signs when the test nutraceutical formulation (combination of flaxseed oil, borage oil and fish oil omega-3 fatty acids) is consumed daily over a 3 month period, with a control capsule that contains polyethylene glycol (PEG), oleic acid and propylene glycol, which are found in many pharmaceutical products and are generally considered to be biologically inert and safe. There is good evidence that the consumption of oily fish has a protective effect against dry eye, and other studies have provided evidence of the beneficial effect of supplementation with omega-3 essential fatty acids in the treatment of dry eye disease. However, there have been limited well designed clinical trials investigating the potential for nutraceutical dietary supplementation to impact ocular comfort. To date, no controlled, randomised clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the test nutraceutical formulation. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked study to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation with a combination of flaxseed oil, borage oil and fish oil omega-3 fatty acids on ocular comfort including signs and symptoms of dry eye.

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common condition that causes ocular discomfort and reduces visual acuity. The two categories of DED are evaporative dry eye and aqueous deficient dry eye. Both conditions can involve pathology of the meibomian glands, lacrimal glands, lids, tear film and surface cells. Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the leading cause of evaporative dry eye and contributes to aqueous deficient dry eye. The goal of MGD therapy is to provide long term improvement of symptoms for patients by improving the quality of meibum, increasing meibum flow, improving tear film stability and decreasing inflammation. Commonly used therapies include preservative free drops, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, topical cyclosporine, serum tears, topical azithromycin, oral doxycycline, moisture chambers, intraductal probing, lib margin exfoliation, automated thermal pulsation, warm compresses, among other. Despite this variety of symptoms, patients often do not experience complete or long term relief of symptoms. Forced meibomian gland expression (MGX) has been shown to be an effective method of rehabilitating meibomian glands and improving dry eye symptoms. The eyelid margins are forcefully compressed to express gland contents. Research has shown improvement in patient symptoms with the use of MGX. Intense pulsed light (IPL) have been used in dermatology to treat various conditions. Patients with DED who have tried other therapies and found no relief, often resort to IPL as a last resort. Research has shown IPL alone may be effective in improving patient symptoms. In addition, such studies have failed to show significant adverse events with the use of IPL. Here, we propose a prospective, randomized, case controlled clinical pilot study to examine the efficacy for both subjective and objective measures. 20 patients with DED will be recruited and will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: MGX alone or MGX with IPL. Objective measures will include tear cytokine levels, impression cytology, meibography, tear osmolarity and others. Subjective measures will include quality of life screening tools. We hypothesize that the use of MGX with IPL will lead to greater improvement in subjective dry eye symptoms and objective measures. Given the lack of adverse effects reported in the literature, we do not anticipate adverse effects in our study. Rochester staff Drs. Faustch and Bourne are providing clinical research advice but have no contact with subjects or biospecimens.