Active clinical trials for "Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca"

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension compared to vehicle (placebo) in subjects who have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease. The product will be studied over 14 days, with 1-2 drops instilled in each eye four times daily (QID).

This study is to determine the efficacy and safety of 3% or 5% DA-6034 eye drops compared with placebo in dry eye syndrome.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether 0.2% and 0.5% R348 Ophthalmic Solutions are safe and effective in the treatment of Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca.

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension compared to vehicle (placebo) in subjects who have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease. The product will be studied over 28 days, with 1-2 drops instilled in each eye four times daily (QID).

Dry eye is a chronic condition that decreases function and affect visual function with severe discapacity until now treatments are based in artificial eye drops. Platelet rich plasma has emerged as a strategy for cellular restoration, the purpose of this study is to evaluate their effects in lacrimal production and safety of this intervention in patients with severe dry eye.

This study assessed the effects of a single intravenous dose of secukinumab (AIN457) 10 mg/kg or canakinumab (ACZ885) 10 mg/kg on the signs and symptoms of dry eye. In addition, the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profiles of secukinumab and canakinumab were assessed. Blood samples were collected for the analysis of the effect of secukinumab and canakinumab on select biomarkers.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of SAR 1118 Ophthalmic Solution (5.0%) compared to placebo in the treatment of Dry Eye. The safety and tolerability of SAR 1118 Ophthalmic Solution (5.0%) compared to placebo in subjects with dry eye when administered BID for 12 weeks will also be evaluated.

The study objective is to evaluate the long-term treatment effectiveness for adult patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and evaporative dry eye by: 1) comparing the LipiFlow® System to a standardized daily warm compress and eyelid hygiene control therapy over a duration of 3 Months; and 2) evaluating the LipiFlow® alone and in combination with other MGD and dry eye treatments over a duration of up to 12 Months. This is a post-market, non-significant risk, prospective and multi-center clinical trial divided into two stages. The first stage from enrollment to 3 Months is an open-label, randomized controlled design to compare the effectiveness of a single LipiFlow® System treatment to a standardized daily warm compress and eyelid hygiene Control therapy with Crossover LipiFlow® treatment of the Control subjects at 3 Months. The second stage, occurring between 3 and 12 Months, is an observational design to evaluate the effectiveness of LipiFlow® alone and in combination with other MGD and dry eye treatments over a duration of up to 12 Months. Subjects are entered into the following subgroups based on the subject's self-assessment of the adequacy of symptom relief and protocol-defined criteria for additional treatment. One LipiFlow® Treatment: Subjects who receive only one LipiFlow® treatment. Two LipiFlow® Treatments: Subjects who receive a second LipiFlow® treatment. Combination Treatment: Subjects who receive one or two LipiFlow® treatments followed by other MGD or dry eye treatment, as prescribed by the physician.

This study will evaluate the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of an eye drop formulation in subjects with dry eye disease.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRO-148 ophthalmic solution compared with SYSTANE ® ophthalmic solution for the treatment of signs and symptoms of mild-to-moderate dry eye syndrome.