Active clinical trials for "Renal Insufficiency"

This research study is a randomized clinical trial to evaluate if taking diuretics (medications that increase urine production and help with fluid removal from the body) in a standardized fashion (using a guideline for adjusting doses based on measured urine output) could improve health outcomes in patients with cardiorenal failure or cardiorenal syndrome (combined heart and kidney failure) with edema (too much fluid in their arms, legs, and/or lungs). Under usual care, these patients are treated with diuretics and other medications in increasing doses, but not necessarily to maintain a specific amount of urine output per day. Current heart failure (HF) treatment guidelines do not provide any standard protocol, or guideline, for adjusting diuretic doses. At the point when kidney function worsens to the degree that the kidneys are no longer able to respond to the medications used to remove fluid, either ultrafiltration (UF) or dialysis (also called hemodialysis [HD]) is typically started in order to remove fluid. In both UF and dialysis, excess fluid is removed from the body by using a machine. In dialysis, both waste products and fluid are removed and electrolyte abnormalities are corrected. In UF, only fluid is removed. Both procedures use the same machine. This study will test whether a Protocolized Diuretic Strategy (ProDiuS), a plan for adjusting diuretic doses based on measured urine output, will improve clinical care for cardiorenal syndrome. Such a plan for adjusting diuretic doses is needed to improve symptoms, decrease the length of hospital stays and rehospitalization rates, and improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cardiorenal syndrome patients.

The objective of the trial is to investigate the effect of different degrees of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of the combination of BI 207127 and faldaprevir after 3 days of dosing (BI 207127 bid, faldaprevir qd) and a single dose of BI 207127 and faldaprevir on day 4.

Part I is a 3-period, active comparator-controlled, fixed sequence study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MK-7145 compared to furosemide in participants with moderate-to-severe renal insufficiency (RI) without heart failure (HF). Primary hypothesis for Part I is that at least one well-tolerated dose of MK-7145 will produce a greater 24hr urinary excretion of sodium (UNa) on the 1st day of MK-7145 dosing than 80 mg furosemide (on the 1st day of furosemide dosing) in participants with moderate-to-severe RI. If MK-7145 is safe at natriuretic doses in RI in Part I of this study, MK-7145 will be investigated in participants with heart failure (HF) and RI (Part II). Part II is 4 period, fixed sequence, active comparator controlled (in Period 1), titration (in Periods 2, 3 and 4) study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a titration regimen of MK-7145 compared to an optimized stable maintenance regimen of furosemide or torsemide in participants with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II and III heart failure and moderate or severe renal insufficiency. The primary hypothesis for Part II is that at least one dose of MK-7145, titrated according to a fixed dose titration regimen, will be associated with a reduction in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) compared to furosemide or torsemide (at 24 hours post morning dose on the last dosing day of each period) in participants with NYHA class II/III HF with moderate or severe RI.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the ASA404 infusion rate and co-administrating ASA404 with paclitaxel + carbopaltin chemotherapy regimen or docetaxel on the pharamcokinetics (PK) of free and total ASA404.

The general aim of this study in adult patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) and severe renal insufficiency is to assess the safety and the efficacy of sirolimus (SRL) in slowing renal function decline as compared to conventional therapy.

The purpose of this study is to assess Alefacept in combination with alemtuzumab induction and calcineurin inhibitor and corticosteroid withdrawal.

This is a feasibility study enrolling up to 40 patients in Australia and Europe. The primary aim of the study is to demonstrate the renal denervation with the Symplicity Catheter is safe and determine the evidence of a response to renal denervation in patients with Heart Failure.

The purpose of this study is to establish the usefulness and the impact of a tailored behavioral-education and counseling intervention titled Self-Management and Resourceful Transition (S.M.a.R.T) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stage 3 chronic kidney disease, in order to help them to manage their behaviors related to their condition and health.

Acute renal failure, now referred to as acute kidney injury, is common in intensive care unit patients, contributes to high morbidity and mortality, and has no proven interventions with benefit once established. In addition to supportive care, these patients frequently receive diuretic therapy, most commonly furosemide. Prior trials showed no impact of furosemide on clinical outcomes and perhaps harm, however, these trials suffered from numerous limitations and lack applicability to modern intensive care unit patients. As a result, there appears a disconnect between clinical practice and available evidence. Survey data supports the view of clinical equipoise for use of furosemide in intensive care unit patients with early acute kidney injury. Moreover, these data also confirm there is an urgent need for higher quality and more definitive evidence from randomized trial on furosemide use in early acute kidney injury. Accordingly, the investigators propose to conduct a pilot phase II randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing furosemide to placebo in ICU patients with early acute kidney injury. The specific aims of this study are: To compare the efficacy and safety of a continuous infusion of furosemide versus placebo titrated to the physiology parameter of urine output in early acute kidney injury on the primary outcome of progression in severity of kidney injury in intensive care unit patients with early AKI and stratified by the presence of sepsis. To evaluate selected secondary endpoints on the impact of furosemide versus placebo, specifically: fluid balance goals; electrolyte and acid-base balance; the need for renal replacement therapy (i.e. dialysis); total duration of acute kidney injury; the rate of renal recovery; and mortality. To compare the impact of furosemide versus placebo on the trajectory of serum and urinary biomarkers (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL], interleukin-18 [IL-18]) and evaluate whether these biomarkers perform superior to conventional measures (creatinine, urea) for monitoring the progression of kidney injury and the prediction of outcome. This trial represents part of a larger initiative aimed towards expanding our understanding of the treatment of acute kidney injury in intensive care unit patients and evaluating interventions that may potentially reduce kidney injury and improve clinical outcomes.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of IV SLV320 in acute heart failure patients with renal dysfunction.