Active clinical trials for "Labor Pain"

This study investigates efficacy, safety and childbirth experience in women receiving pudendal block during the final stage of delivery. It is an observational study and half of included primarous women recieve a pudendal block.

Epidural analgesia is widely used for managing pain during labor. The programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) technique has been shown to produce less consumption of local anesthetics, better sensory block, less motor block, and increased maternal satisfaction than other epidural analgesia techniques. Despite all benefits from PIEB, such practice has been associated with high sensory block levels. Therefore, assessment of the sensory block level is an essential component of clinical safety. The lack of a standardized technique and timing to assess the sensory block level can lead to inappropriate management. The purpose of this study is to investigate the changes in block level over time, during cycles of a PIEB regimen. The investigators hypothesize that these levels will be highest soon after the PIEB bolus and lowest preceding the subsequent PIEB bolus. The investigators also want to investigate a possible correlation between these changes in sensory block levels and motor block, pain scores, and rescue bolus of local anesthetics.

Since 1999, labor pain control has being performed in China, and the initial time of analgesia is at the cervix >= 2 cm. Meanwhile, American Society of Obstetrics & Gynecology recommended that the labor analgesia with neuraxial block should be performed at the cervix >= 4 cm in 2002. After that, the threshold has been revised to at least >= 2 cm in 2006 by the Society. However, in China, the practice of labor analgesia with neuraxial block has being performed for over seven years. Up until now, the practice has being experienced during this ten-year period at the cervix around 1 cm. The investigators hypothesized that labor pain control in different stages had different characteristics and had different influence on patients short- and long-lasting outcomes. This study is mainly investigating different labor analgesia procedures in different stages since the initiation of the practice in 1999, and assessing their influence on the outcomes to display the trajectory of development of labor analgesia in China of which might fit to the the whole process of the study of labor analgesia throughout the world. All these were done by analyzing the data records since from January 1999 to December 2008.

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (PIEB) has become a standard technique for labour analgesia in many departments of anesthesia. Advantages to the former standard of care, continued epidural infusion (CEI), include reduced analgesic consumption , better maternal satisfaction and less occurrence of motor block . At Mount Sinai Hospital, the introduction of a bundle of changes in the management of labor analgesia including the use of PIEB, has resulted in an improvement of the quality of labor analgesia. This bundle of changes included labor catheter placement more often at L2/L3 interspace, more frequent use of fentanyl in the epidural loading dose, the implementation of a PIEB regimen and an increase in hourly baseline offer of local anesthetic. A recent before-and-after study conducted by the investigators, comparing the current practice with the previous practice, which was based on CEI, identified that the incidence of women experiencing pain >3 (scale 0-10) (40% vs 30%) and the number of nurse-administered top-ups (24% vs 3%) were significantly reduced. However, despite that significant improvement, some 30% of women undergoing epidural analgesia still experience pain NRS >3 (NRS scale 0-10) during either first or second stage of labor. Although the health care team attempts to manage epidurals as standardized as possible, there is some variation in practice resulting from the many stakeholders involved in the labor analgesia management, including anesthesiologists, obstetricians, nurses and patients. The investigators hypothesized that our most recent results may be explained by the lack of standardization of the management of epidural analgesia and that a standardized epidural catheter placement and a management algorithm may improve the efficacy of our epidural analgesia regimen. The aim of this pilot study is to test the feasibility and efficacy of the use of a standardized algorithm for the management of labor epidural analgesia based on a PIEB regimen.

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, and controlled trial was to compare the efficacy of single-shot spinal analgesia to typical conventional treatments (continuous epidural analgesia and spinal-epidural combination) in reducing labor pain, particularly in multiparous women. we will enroll in each of the three groups(S group= single-shot Spinal group), (E group= Continuous Epidural), and (C group = combined spinal-epidural) women in advanced active labor and fulfill inclusion criteria.

The aim of the present study was to examine, for pain relief during labor, the efficacy of two pharmacological approaches - the 0.125% ropivacaine alone and the 0.0625% ropivacaine added to 75 ug clonidine, both by epidural administration. The effect of the drugs on mother and newborn was also determined.

Pharmacogenetics has allowed clinicians to identify associations between an individual's genetic profile and his/her response to drugs. The A118G (c.188A>G)is a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the mu-opioid receptor (OPRM1). The mutated protein, N40D, appears to increase the binding affinity and potency of beta-endorphin approximately 3-fold. Individuals carrying the variant receptor gene (A118G) may show differences in some of the functions mediated by beta-endorphin action at the altered OPRM1. Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia is a commonly utilized technique for labor analgesia. Analgesia is initiated with the intrathecal administration of a lipid-soluble opioid (e.g. fentanyl), sometimes combined with a local anesthetic. The mean (± SD) duration of analgesia after intrathecal fentanyl 25 microgram was 89 ± 43 min. The ED50 of intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia varies between 14 microgram to 18.2 microgram. The wide variability in the duration of analgesia, as was well the differences in ED50 may result from differences known to affect labor pain (e.g., ethnicity, parity, stage of labor). Another possible explanation for the differences in opioid requirements and duration, as well as incidence of side effects such as itching and nausea/vomiting, is that opioid responsiveness is determined by genetic variability of the µ-opioid receptor. The ED50 for intrathecal fentanyl labor analgesia was significantly lower for parturients carrying the A118G variant of the mu-opioid receptor, compared to parturients with the A118 wild type receptor. The purpose of this study is to determine whether polymorphism at nucleotide 118 of OPRM1 influences the duration of intrathecal opioid (fentanyl) labor analgesia, and intrathecal opioid (morphine) postoperative analgesia.

This study will compare the performance of a contraction monitor (tocometer) device developed by Fetal Life with standard tocometer devices. The study aims to test a uterine contraction monitor that can be applied by the patient to her abdomen and connected to her smart device to detect the frequency and duration of uterine contractions. Phase 1 will collect data for calibration of the monitor and for a noninferiority study comparing the Fetal Life uterine contraction monitor (tocometer) with standard tocometry devices. Phase 2 will be a feasibility study in which patients will position the monitor, connect to the corresponding Fetal Life app and measure their own uterine contraction activity. The study's hypothesis is that after calibration, the new monitor will reliably detect at least 95% of the number and duration of contractions detected by the standard monitor, and that the device will perform comparably whether applied by the patient or by research staff.

Background: This descriptive study was designed to evaluate effects and adverse effects of spinal sufentanil for relief of labor pain in primi- and multiparous women. Methods: The retrospective study design was approved by the regional Human Research Ethics Review Board, Lund, Sweden (Dnr 2015/687). The investigators included 164 (82 primi- and 82 multiparous) obstetrical patients given 10 µg of intrathecal sufentanil for labor pain. Any maternal hypotension, third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, intrapartum Cesarean section, abnormal fetal heart rate, low Apgar score, use of neonatal intensive care, postdural puncture headache, epidural blood patch, and breastfeeding problem was recorded. Major outcome measures were maternal satisfaction with pain relief, and provision of supplementary analgesia.

ne of the non-pharmacological methods that provide opportunities such as massage and freedom of movement with the support of the spouse / partner is the birth dance. In order to reduce the pain perceived by the woman and provide emotional support, the birth dance is started in the active phase of the first phase of the labor and continues until the end of the first phase. The woman is given the opportunity to act rhythmically with a relaxing light music with someone she prefers (spouse / partner, mother, midwife, etc.). The hands of the pregnant woman dance in the form of swinging from left to right, on the shoulder of his wife, with music; The partner is massaged by the sacrum area. It is aimed to increase the effectiveness of the method applied by adding spouse / partner support, upright posture and massage in addition to the music and body movements that dance includes, and also to provide emotional support to the woman. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effect of birth dance on traumatic birth perception and comfort.