Active clinical trials for "Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases"

Purpose: It is unknown whether instillation of a drop of anesthetic ophthalmic solution into the eye such as proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% prior to probing and irrigation of the tear duct (lacrimal drainage) system improves participant comfort during the procedure. To date, there have been no formal studies evaluating the possible benefit of this pretreatment. Methods: Participants 18 years and older who present to the Louisiana State University or associated outpatient ophthalmology clinic(s) with a complaint of epiphora (excessive tearing) who necessitate bilateral lower lid probing and irrigation of the lacrimal drainage system will be enrolled in the study. One eye will be randomized to receive a drop of the anesthetic Proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% and the other eye will receive a control drop of Balanced Salt Solution (BSS). Probing and irrigation will then be performed in the usual fashion. The participant will then be questioned via survey on a pain scale of 1-5 as to the amount of subjective pain experienced on each side during the procedure. Expected Results: Investigators expect participants will experience statistically significantly less pain in eyes that have received a drop of Proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% prior to performance of probing and irrigation compared to the eyes which have received the control drop.

On the basis of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis operation for the treatment of lower thoracic esophageal cancer or esophageal gastric junction cancer, the purpose of this study is to compare the probability of anastomotic leakage and stenosis after esophagogastric side to side anastomosis and esophagogastric end to side anastomosis, combined with the probability of complications, quality of life and survival rate of patients after the two anastomotic methods, To explore which anastomotic method is better than the worse for patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer or cancer at the junction of esophagus and stomach. This study explored a minimally invasive anastomotic method with lower incidence of complications and higher quality of life for patients during Ivor Lewis surgery, which can increase the clinical benefits of patients, improve the quality of life, and extend the survival period, and has important clinical value.

In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) used in tertiary care ophthalmology centers is performed with two reflectance microscopes attached on a mounting with limited movement along the XYZ axes. Consequently, ocular diseases in the central area have been described (mostly cornea and adjacent conjunctiva). Two dermatology IVCM (an handheld small IVCM and a multifluorescent one) present significant innovations that the investigators want to assess in ophthalmology for the diagnosis of conjunctiva, cornea, eyelid and lachrymal tract diseases. The handheld IVCM have unlimited degrees of freedom and a small diameter objective. It could dramatically increase the area accessible to IVCM (whole conjunctiva, eyelids, proximal lachrymal tract) (part 1 of the present study). The fluorescent IVCM allows the use of a wide range of fluorescent markers liable to increase the specificity of the diagnosis by revealing staining patterns corresponding to a specific disease and not to others (part 2 of the study)

This project aims to test whether a newly designed lacrimal stent - the SlitStent - when placed into the lacrimal system in the standard fashion following a DCR surgery, will provide good symptomatic relief for epiphora and be well tolerated. Epiphora, or severe tearing, is both a very common debilitating symptom and a potential cause of dangerous infections (i.e. dacryocystitis and orbital cellulitis). DCR+lacrimal stenting surgery is 80-95% successful at improving epiphora, and the longer the stent remains in place, the better the long-term outcome. However, lacrimal stents that provide adequate circumferential force to facilitate post-DCR healing also occupy space and prevent good tear drainage until removed. Yet patients want complete symptomatic improvement as soon as possible, even if it compromises long-term results. This study aims to test a newly designed lacrimal stent that allows tears to drain through the lumen of the stent. The new stent is constructed by modifying a commercially available stent by placing openings along the side of the stent using a process developed by a University of Michigan engineer/collaborator. Following slit placement, the stent will be gas-sterilized for surgery. Patient who are scheduled for DCR+stenting surgery who provide informed consent will be randomized 2:1 to receive the investigational SlitStent or the standard commercially available stent. Following surgery, patients will be assessed both clinically, which is standard of care, and via a patient questionnaire.

Purpose: It is unknown whether instillation of a drop of anesthetic ophthalmic solution into the eye such as proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% prior to probing and irrigation of the tear duct (lacrimal drainage) system improves participant comfort during the procedure. To date, there have been no formal studies evaluating the possible benefit of this pretreatment. Methods: Participants 18 years and older who present to the William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak, Michigan outpatient ophthalmology clinic with a chief complaint of epiphora (excessive tearing) who necessitate bilateral lower lid probing and irrigation of the lacrimal drainage system will be enrolled in the study. One eye will be randomized to receive a drop of the anesthetic Proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% and the other eye will receive a control drop of Balanced Salt Solution (BSS). Probing and irrigation will then be performed in the usual fashion. The participant will then be questioned via survey on a pain scale of 1-5 as to the amount of subjective pain experienced on each side during the procedure. Expected Results: Investigators expect participants will experience statistically significantly less pain in eyes that have received a drop of Proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% prior to performance of probing and irrigation compared to the eyes which have received the control drop.

The purpose of study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of lacrimal silicone intubation for the management of epiphora.

Epiphora or excessive tearing is a significant disability for many affected patients diminishing their quality of life. There is a growing consensus that injection of Botulinum Toxin A (BTX-A) into the lacrimal gland provides relief in patients with hyperlacrimation secondary to aberrant regeneration of the 7th nerve, and limited evidence that it might help to reduce normal tear production in patients with epiphora from anatomic or functional outflow obstructions. BTX-A has been injected both transconjunctivally into the palpebral lobe of the lacrimal gland and transcutaneously into the orbital lobe. Both delivery routes have been successful in symptom relief with minimal complications. However, the effectiveness of transconjunctival versus transcutaneous injections has not been systematically compared. Also, whether the incidence of side effects is related to the dosage, concentration, or location of injection is unknown and has also not been systematically studied. The investigators plan to conduct a randomized clinical trial in patients with functional tearing comparing the transcutaneous delivery route of BTX-A to the transconjunctival delivery route (the most common route described in the literature). The investigators will also compare the side effect profile of each delivery route.

Prospective, open label, multi-center, non-randomized study designed to collect initial clinical data related to the safety and clinical performance of the Sinopsys Lacrimal Stent for use during repair of the lacrimal system in patients with functional or obstructive epiphora.

Assessing efficacy of punctal dilatation with insertion of perforated punctal plugs for the management of acquired punctal stenosis due to allergic conjunctivitis in otherwise healthy patients.

This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the male hormone dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in treating Sjogren's syndrome. This autoimmune disorder, in which the immune system attacks the salivary glands and tear glands, affects primarily women. Patients' eyes and mouth become drier over time, and can lead to problems such as serious tooth decay and eye irritations. Sex hormones seem to influence the immune response and may help decrease disease severity. DHEA has benefited some patients with two other autoimmune diseases, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Women 18 to 75 years of age with Sjogren's syndrome may be eligible for this 7-month study. At the initial visit, candidates will have a physical examination, routine blood and urine tests and eye and dental examinations, including a test to measure saliva production for screening purposes and to establish baseline values for participants. Those enrolled in the study will be randomly assigned to take either DHEA or placebo (look-alike tablet with no active ingredient) once a day for 6 months and will be monitored with follow-up visits at months 1, 3, 6 and 7. Physical examination, blood tests and urinalysis will be repeated at months 1, 3, 6 and 7; saliva will be collected at months 3, 6 and 7; and eyes will be examined at 3 and 6 months. Because hormone changes may have both physical and emotional effects, patients will be asked questions about their mood, symptoms and side effects of treatment. It is not known if Sjogren's syndrome is associated with osteoporosis (bone thinning), but since this condition occurs in other autoimmune disorders, patient's bone density will be measured at the first visit, and blood drawn at 3 and 6 months will be tested for various substances associated with changes in bone density. A 24-hour urine collection at the first visit and later urine tests will also be tested for substances associated with bone thinning.