Active clinical trials for "Heart Failure"

This early feasibility study is intended to characterize the impact of pulmonary artery denervation on the quality of life in Heart Failure Patients with Group 2 Pulmonary Hypertension

Finerenone will be compared to placebo to determine efficacy and safety of treatment in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate if a bariatric surgery strategy will improve clinical endpoints, cardiac parameters and functional status in patients with obesity (with BMI 32-40 kg/m2) and symptomatic HF with preserved or mildly reduced LVEF in combination with AF, as compared to standard of care. Patients will be randomized to either the Intervention group receiving bariatric surgery including an intensive pre- and postoperative treatment scheme or to the control group receiving standard of care.

Diabetes can lead to heart failure independently, but the underlying causes remain incompletely understood. The main aim of this study is to identify differential regulation of mitochondrial substrate utilization and complex activity in heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). For this, we will conduct a prospective, observational study to examine myocardial mitochondrial oxidative function and related metabolic parameters, gene expression, histological markers, and inflammation in cardiac tissue from patients with heart failure or patients after heart transplantation. We will further assess cardiac function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with and without stress protocols and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Glycemic control/T2DM will be characterized by oral glucose tolerance tests. The results of this project will help to better understand the cellular mechanisms of the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy and contribute to the development of early diagnostic, as well as therapeutic approaches for the prevention and treatment of diabetic cardiomyopathy.

The goal of this observational study is to describe the impacts of COVID-19 on primary care chronic condition management in Canada within various patient populations. This will be done by analyzing primary care electronic medial record (EMR) data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) database, including data on primary care encounters, as well as various markers for chronic conditions. The research questions to be investigated are: 1a) What are the changes to the management of chronic conditions in primary care since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic? 1b) How do these changes differ by age, health status, and socioeconomic status?

Type 2 diabetes is an important co-morbid condition strongly associated with the risk of developing heart failure (HF). Risk scores such as the WATCH-DM score that predict the occurrence of HF among diabetes patients are largely based on data collected from white ethnicities. Here, the investigators sought to investigate surrogate markers for predicting HF among type 2 diabetes patients of Asian ethnicities.

Heart failure with moderately reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is a frequent disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality and therefore requires effective therapies that may improve clinical outcomes. The most common reason of HFmrEF is ischemic injury, usually caused by myocardial infarction, that may lead to left ventricular remodeling and systolic dysfunction, accompanied by symptoms of heart failure. Therefore, the anti-remodeling therapies may effectively improve clinical outcomes. Recently, sacubitril/valsartan - the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor suppressing the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and enhancing the effect of natriuretic peptides - has been introduced in the treatment of heart failure. To date, this drug was found to be clinically beneficial in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), however has not been tested in the group of patients with HFmrEF. The aim of the study is to evaluate effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan as compared with ramipril on left ventricular remodeling and function in patients with ischemic HFmrEF. Patients with ischemic HFmrEF, New York Heart Association class II-IV symptoms, an elevated plasma natriuretic peptide level and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40-49 % will be enrolled in this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study. Initially, patients will enter a single-blind ramipril run-in period (titrated to 5 mg bid), followed by a sacubitril/valsartan run-in period (100 mg titrated to 200 mg bid). A total of 666 patients tolerating both periods will be randomized 1:1 to either ramipril 10 mg bid or sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg bid. The primary endpoint will be the change of left ventricular end-systolic volume index within 12-month of treatment as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. The main secondary endpoints include the change of left ventricular end-diastolic volume index within 12-month of treatment, the change of LVEF within 12-month of treatment, 12-month composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or heart failure requiring hospitalization, 12-month cardiovascular death, 12-month heart failure requiring hospitalization, time to death or heart failure requiring hospitalization or mortality rate within 12-month of treatment. This study may determine the place of sacubitril/valsartan as an alternative to ramipril in the treatment of patients with ischemic HFmrEF in order to prevent further left ventricular remodeling and to improve its systolic function.

Heart failure occurs when the heart is no longer able to pump blood around the body properly. It can cause breathlessness, swollen feet and ankles, and tiredness. In about half of patients with heart failure, one measure of the heart's pumping function, called the 'ejection fraction', is normal. This type of heart failure is called heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, or HFpEF. HFpEF remains poorly understood. It is not clear why some people develop HFpEF, or what determines the severity of the condition. Treatment options may be limited. UK HFpEF is a study that aims to gain a better understanding of why people develop HFpEF, develop better tests to diagnosis it, identify and test new treatments, and follow the health of the people taking part over many years.

Heart failure has a high morbidity and mortality because the heart is one of the least regenerative organs in the human body. Drug treatments for heart failure manage symptoms but do not restore lost myocytes. Cellular replacement therapy is a potential approach to repair damaged myocardial tissue, restore cardiac function, which has become a new strategy for the treatment of heart failure. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of intramyocardial delivery of cardiomyocytes at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic heart failure.

Prior studies have shown that left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation commonly results in right ventricular failure (RVF). Right ventricular dysfunction and failure after LVAD implantation is known to increase morbidity and mortality and contribute to longer post-implant hospital length of stay. Since RVF is difficult to predict and can have harmful effects such as increased ICU stay, adverse outcomes, and mortality, it could be beneficial to preemptively treat patients through preoperative or intraoperative percutaneous right ventricular assist device (RVAD) placement to prevent RVF. This trial will include both a prospective interventional cohort and a retrospective control cohort. The prospective interventional cohort will consist of patients undergoing LVAD implantation at Massachusetts General Hospital. These patients will preemptively receive an RVAD (either the ProtekDuo or Impella RP) surrounding LVAD implantation. The historical control cohort will consist of retrospective data collection on patients who have undergone LVAD implantation in the past. This group will be matched with the enrolled prospective interventional patients. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of standard of care treatment versus percutaneous RVAD placement perioperatively to LVAD implantation. The investigators hypothesize that the use of the RVAD will mitigate need for inotropic support, reducing the vasoactive-inotrope score (VIS) by 50%, and will improve end organ function in patients compared to standard of care. Subjects who consent to the study will undergo peri-operative placement of an RVAD, which will be left in up to 72 hours postoperatively. The type of RVAD (Impella RP or ProtekDuo) inserted will be determined by patient needs and venous access and will be up to the discretion of the treating physician. 25 subjects will be enrolled in the prospective interventional cohort and compared to 25 subjects in the matched retrospective control cohort.