Active clinical trials for "Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous"

Bolivian cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania braziliensis was treated with the combination of miltefosine (150 mg/day for 28 days) plus intralesional pentamidine (120 ug/mm2 lesion area on days 1, 3, and 5).

The present study was designed as a randomized, single blind, placebo-controlled, study to evaluate the effect of 400 µg of recombinant human GM-CSF applied intralesionally and associated with half of the total dose of antimony in a reduced time schedule (20mgSbV/Kg/d for 10 days) as compared to the full dose of antimony (20mgSbV/Kg/d for 20 days) to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis ulcers.

The rationales of a clinical trial comparing intralesional antimonial therapy versus wound care management in patients with old world cutaneous leishmaniasis (OWCL) are the following: The effectiveness of the current mainstay treatment with intralesional antimonials for CL is subject to discussion, especially in L. major lesions which are predominant in Northern Afghanistan The importance of wound care management in patients with OWCL has been emphasized by Gonzalez et al. (2008) and its efficacy is confirmed in the Kabul trial with L. tropica patients. Parallel to the clinical efficacy the trial investigates the cost-effectiveness and -utility of the treatment options under study.

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of low doses of pentavalent antimony (meglumine antimoniate) to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis ulcers in patients older than 65 years. The hypothesis is that older patients may have a positive response with a lower dose of pentavalent antimony, avoiding the frequent adverse events observed with the standard dose. The design is that of an open uncontrolled trial enrolling 20 patients infected with the parasite Leishmania braziliensis in an endemic area of the State of Bahia, Brazil. The endpoint of cure or therapeutic failure will be evaluated at the third month of follow-up after treatment to avoid the impact of spontaneous cure as a confounding factor.

The aim of the randomized double blind trial with 134 patients presenting old world cutaneous leishmaniasis is: to evaluate the clinical efficacy of electro-thermo-cauterisation (ETC) followed by moist wound treatment versus ETC followed by moist wound treatment plus 0.05 % pharmaceutical chlorite that has been used in three European countries (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) in wound care management for more than 20 years; to judge whether early wound care management would present a viable improvement to the actual anti-parasitic treatments mostly neglecting the chronic wound problem and to evaluate its long-term effect on immunity through relapse control 6 months after wound healing.

This study will test the ability of the topical cream WR 279,396 to treat the skin lesions caused by the parasite called leishmania. WR 279,396 is an antibiotic preparation that contains paromomycin + gentamicin. This cream will be compared to the effect of a topical cream containing paromomycin alone and to a placebo cream that contains no antibiotics. Therefore, this study will have three groups of patients, and they will be assigned to one of these treatments randomly. The study will be carried out without the patient or the physician knowing which cream is being used for which patient. The goal is to determine if WR 279,396 cream or the paromomycin cream is better than placebo, and if WR 279,396 is better than paromomycin alone.

The hypothesis of this trial is that the therapeutic activity and safety of oral miltefosine in Brazilian patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis is similar or superior to the intravenous standard treatment (meglumine antimoniate - Glucantime®).

OBJECTIVE: Compare the efficacy and side effects of allopurinol versus glucantime versus allopurinol/glucantime in patients in Brazil with cutaneous leishmaniasis.

This study is a pivotal Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, 3-site, two-group trial assessing the efficacy and safety of WR 279,396 Topical Cream and Paromomycin Alone Topical Cream in subjects with CL in Panama. The primary objective of this study is to determine if WR 279,396 results in statistically superior final clinical cure rates of an index lesion when compared with Paromomycin Alone for the treatment of CL in Panama expected to be caused by L panamensis.

The proposed study encompasses a two-step approach. The first aiming to determine the safety of Topical 3% Amphotericin B Cream when applied three or two times per day for 4 weeks in subjects with un-complicated Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) whilst the second focusing in having and indication of the efficacy of the two above mentioned regimens of Topical 3% Amphotericin B Cream For the first step, 30 subjects will be randomly assigned to receive direct observed treatment (DOT) with Topical 3% Amphotericin B Cream applied either three or two times per day for 4 weeks. Enrolment will be temporarily halted until all 30 subjects (15 in each group) have been enrolled and completed the 28 day treatment course. An interim analysis of all safety (Adverse Events, including local reactions and lab parameters) and pharmacokinetics collected on subjects who were randomized will be performed by data safety monitoring board. If no serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the study drug are identified on the first 30 subjects by the end of the treatment course, 50 additional subjects will be randomly allocated to receive Topical 3% Amphotericin B Cream either three or two times per day for 28 days Subjects will have a follow-up visit at the end of therapy, on Day 45± 5 days, Day 63± 5 days and on Days 90± 14 days and on Day 180, minus 14d, plus 4 weeks to assess efficacy, as measured by the number of subjects who fulfil the cure criteria: 100% re-epithelialization of the lesion(s) by Day 90 and no relapse by Day 180. All subjects will be followed up to Day 180 for final analysis of efficacy.