Active clinical trials for "Leishmaniasis, Visceral"

This is a phase II, multicentre, randomized, two-arm blinded study with an open label calibrator arm in adults and adolescents (≥12 years) with confirmed primary VL.

This study aimed to collect and analyze clinical specimens of patients with classic infectious diseases in the real world. To investigate the epidemiological distribution of classic infectious diseases (brucellosis, epidemic hemorrhagic fever, kala-azar) and treatment options suitable for China.

This prospective cohort study has the aim to develop a prognostic tool to predict relapse in patients suffering from visceral leishmaniasis (VL) from VL endemic regions in Ethiopia. Therefore, comprehensive clinical and laboratory characterization of all confirmed VL patients before and during treatment will be performed in order to identify the factors that determine prognosis of the patients. This approach would result in more efficient patient care and would reduce the case fatality and morbidity, and improve follow-up and care for those at risk of VL relapse.

This is a randomized, open-label, phase II, single-centre study, with one LXE408 regimen and one calibrator arm with the standard of care SSG combined with PM, to be conducted in male and female adult and adolescent (≥15 years and <45 years) patients with confirmed primary visceral leishmaniasis in Ethiopia.

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a fatal disease caused by Leishmania parasites and transmitted by female phlebotomine sandflies. The disease is a serious public health problem in eastern Africa; including Kenya where an estimated 4000 cases occur annually and 5 million people are at risk of infection. Accurate diagnosis of VL is critical for appropriate treatment. Currently, VL diagnosis in Kenya is based on testing suspected patients with the IT-Leish rK39 rapid diagnostic test (RDT) followed by other tests such as the Direct Agglutination Tests (DAT) and microscopy of tissue aspirates (splenic, bone marrow, lymph node) on rK39-negative patients. However, these diagnostic tools present several challenges including; the need for expertise, equipment and low diagnostic sensitivity of (85%) for DAT and rK39. Alternative VL diagnostic tools that are readily available, easy to use with increased sensitivity are needed to improve VL surveillance and control in Kenya. In the present study, we will assess rK28 as a diagnostic tool including performance with increased sensitivity when used together with IT-Leish rK39 and its potential for inclusion in VL diagnosis algorithms and evaluate Kala-azar Detect rK39 for potential use in Kenya. Suspected patients presenting at VL testing facilities in Marsabit, Turkana and Wajir Counties will be recruited prospectively and tested using IT-Leish rK39 followed by DAT for case confirmation according to the national guidelines. Alongside the case confirmation, samples from participants will also be tested using the rK28 and Kala-azar Detect rK39 in whole blood and serum. The collected data will be analyzed and compared separately between the RDTs as well as in combination, and the performance of the algorithms determined retrospectively. This design will enable the assessment of the sensitivity of combining rK28 and rK39 (Kala-azar Detect) compared to rK39 (IT-Leish/Kala-azar Detect) alone. Microscopy will be used as confirmatory test. We will also assess the feasibility, usefulness, and cost-effectiveness of rK28 in the VL diagnostic algorithm, through sensitivity analyses. The improved understanding of rK28 as a VL diagnostic tool and its potential for inclusion in the VL diagnosis algorithm could enable faster and more effective management of cases and accelerate elimination of VL.

Left untreated, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is fatal. The highest burden of VL worldwide is in eastern Africa where field-adapted diagnostic and test-of-cure tools and treatment are lacking. The current laboratory tool to help assessing cure, treatment failure and relapse is microscopy, based on invasive sampling (e.g. splenic or bone marrow aspirate). Non-invasive, more sensitive tools will enable these assessments with minimum risk and discomfort to patients. This study aims to evaluate immunological and molecular tests to predict cure and relapse, and to replace with these the current invasive methods. The study will be conducted at the Leishmaniasis Research and Treatment Centre (LRTC), Gondar University Hospital, Ethiopia It will be a non-intervention study, the tools under evaluation will be considered as index tests; their results will not influence patient management during the duration of the study. Patient management will follow the national guidelines for VL diagnosis and management in Ethiopia.

ImmStat@Cure is a multicentre observational study designed to assess the immune status of patients before and after treatment for visceral leishmaniasis. Forty patients and 30 controls will be recruited per site. The follow-up period is 6 months from the end of treatment.

This study aims to describe the burden of Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis and visceral leishmaniasis relapse in a cohort of patients discharged after successful treatment of primary visceral leishmaniasis.

This study is aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of medications currently used in Brazil for treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. The investigators will compare the effects of meglumine antimoniate, two formulations of amphotericin B: deoxycholate and liposomal, and a combination of meglumine plus the liposomal amphotericin B formulation. The study is designed to demonstrate the difference in efficacy measured as cure rate at six months after treatment and the safety profile based on the adverse event rate observed with each intervention.

This is a phase II/III open, comparative dose trial to find the lowest single dose of AmBisome for the treatment of primary, symptomatic visceral leishmaniasis(VL), in HIV negative patients. In this trial, the minimum effective dose will be determined in a sequential step, dose escalation design, which minimises the number of patients exposed to low, potentially inadequate doses and provides contemporaneous comparative data against the manufacturer's recommended dose schedule in this indication.