Low-dose Chemotherapy Combine With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor to Treat ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia...
ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaThe aim of our study is to improve the major molecular remission(MMR) rate and reduce the cost to treat ph(+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) by adjusting chemotherapy regimens and the dosage of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI). lower the classification of chemotherapy drugs, lower the side effect brought by which this would be a grateful news for the patients once this regimens gain a successful result, which is also the final aim of our efforts.
TKI Therapy Based on Molecular Monitoring in Allogeneic-HSCT Recipients With Philadelphia Chromosome-positive...
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphocytic LeukemiaStem Cell Transplantation1 moreThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor(TKI) therapy based on molecular monitoring of BCR/ABL levels in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL)undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(allo-HSCT).
Study on Two Different Formulations of 6-mercaptopurine. Tablet Versus Oral Liquid
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia6-mercaptopurine TherapyAcute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) accounts for 30 % of all childhood malignancies. The patients undergo four phases of treatment, finishing with a late maintenance phase in which 6-mercaptopurine and Methotrexate are essential components. Insufficient treatment intensity in this phase is associated with increased risk of relapse. Excessive variation in the bioavailability of 6-mercaptopurine has been observed which can cause both risks of undertreatment/relapse as well as overtreatment with severe side effects. In the attempt to achieve individualized 6-mercaptopurine dosing different approaches have been pursued. Nonetheless variation in bioavailability remains a problem. Earlier, oral tablets of 50 mg (Purinethol) were the only administration form of 6-mercaptopurine and it was primarily designed for adult patients. Challenges with accurate dosing and getting the children to swallow the tablets have been a widespread problem, forcing the caregivers to divide or crush the tablets as well as having to administer different dosages over 2-3 days. Due to these problems, an oral liquid formulation of 6-mercaptopurine (Xaluprine) has been developed. However this oral liquid has only been tested on healthy adult volunteers, and not on the target group, childhood patients. This project will assess the bioavailability and plasma kinetics of oral liquid and tablet formulation of 6-mercaptopurine in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The investigators hypothesize to observe comparable plasma kinetics, in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia when treated with 6-mercaptopurine in the form of a tablet and oral liquid formulation, as previously observed in healthy adults.
Rituximab+mVPDL for CD20(+) Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaThe investigators would like to propose a phase-2 prospective multicenter trial evaluating the efficacy of rituximab combination with our current chemotherapy strategy for adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), in order to prove out whether the addition of rituximab during induction, consolidation, and post-alloHCT status can improve the outcome in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) when compared with our prior data as a historical control.
Trial of Cladribine, Cytarabine, Mitoxantrone, Filgrastim (CLAG-M) in Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic...
Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaLymphoblastic Lymphoma2 moreCLAG-M is an active, well tolerated regimen in acute myelogenous leukemia. Each of the agents is active in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) as well. The current trial will determine the efficacy of the regimen in patients with relapsed ALL.
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia...
LeukemiaRATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying the side effects of combination chemotherapy and to see how well it works in treating adult patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Monoclonal Antibodies in Recurrent or Refractory B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) (MARALL)...
Recurrent or Refractory B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic LeukaemiaThe treatment of adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) has progressed considerably in the past 3 decades, particularly due to intensification of chemotherapies, improved supportive care and the incorporation of stem cell transplantation. However, the maximum tolerability of standard chemotherapeutics has been reached in ALL. Using conventional chemotherapy, 80-85% of adults with ALL will achieve a complete remission (CR). Unfortunately treatment at relapse is generally unsuccessful and rarely results, in long-term survival (7% survival at 5 years). Therefore, the investigators are exploring novel treatment strategies through the use of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) directed at surface antigens on leukaemic blasts. Using MoAbs directed against surface proteins on B cells has had excellent results in other B-cell diseases such as low and high grade non-Hodgkin lymphomas, without additional toxicity. There has also been limited evidence from small studies and case reports of the efficacy of MoAbs in ALL. This is a Phase I/II study to determine the safety and tolerability of the combination of veltuzumab and epratuzumab with intensive chemotherapy in patients with relapsed B-cell ALL. A maximum of 51 patients will be treated with a combination of UKALL XII induction chemotherapy and the monoclonal antibodies veltuzumab and epratuzumab. Veltuzumab and epratuzumab are humanised monoclonal antibodies that target CD20 and CD22 surface proteins, respectively. Both of these proteins are expressed on ALL tumour B cells. One group of patients will receive modified UKALL XII chemotherapy + veltuzumab; a second, modified UKALL XII chemotherapy + epratuzumab and if limited toxicity is found in these first 2 groups, a third group will receive, modified UKALL XII chemotherapy + both veltuzumab and epratuzumab. Patients will be assessed for safety, tolerability and disease response. Safety and tolerability will be measured by the number of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in each group. Disease response will be measured by the microscopic appearance of patient bone marrow samples at day 29, and by molecular tests for tumour cells in bone marrow.
PR104 in Treating Patients With Refractory/Relapsed Acute Leukemia
Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaAcute Lymphocytic LeukemiaThe current understanding of PR104 justifies the evaluation of PR104 in subjects with relapsed/refractory AML and ALL. These include: Hypoxia. Leukemic bone marrow is likely to demonstrate a level of hypoxia sufficient to activate PR104 to its active metabolites PR104H and PR104M. Myelotoxicity as the primary toxicity at MTD. In prior clinical studies in subjects with solid tumors PR104 has demonstrated myelotoxicity as the primary toxicity. This observation suggests that PR104 will exert a similar effect on leukemic cells. AKR1C3. AML has been reported to exhibit high levels of AKR1C3 which should lead to selective activation of PR104 within both hypoxic and oxic leukemic cells. Preclinical data. PR104 has demonstrated impressive activity in an initial study using primary human ALL in a mouse model. The initial dose finding phase of the study will provide estimates of the activity and toxicity of PR104 in subjects with refractory/relapsed AML, and determine the optimal individualized dose to give each subject based on his/her covariates (prior CR duration, prior number of salvage therapies, age). Once a potentially beneficial dose has been determined, an expanded cohort of subjects with AML or ALL will receive PR104 at a uniform dose. This information will prove valuable in defining the future clinical development of PR104, and in determining if PR104 has sufficient activity and acceptable safety in AML to warrant future phase II or phase III studies in this indication. Primary objectives Determine the toxicities and recommended dose of PR104 when administered IV to subjects with relapsed/refractory AML and ALL. Secondary objectives Evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of PR104 and a series of PR104 metabolites Evaluate any anti-tumor effects of PR104 Evaluate the expression of AKR1C3 in bone marrow and leukemic cells Evaluate potential biomarkers of hypoxia
The GD-2008 ALL Protocol for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaThe Guangdong work group of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy was set up in October 2002. The investigators treated the childhood ALL with a GZ2002 protocol since the year 2002, and the protocol was mainly derived from the ALLIC-BFM 2002 protocol. After summarizing the last six years' experience, our group revised the GZ2002 ALL protocol in the year 2008, which is named GD-2008 ALL protocol. The diagnosis and classified criteria is according to the ALLIC-BFM 2002 protocol, and the chemotherapy protocol consists all the therapeutic phases as the ALLIC-BFM 2002 protocol prescribed.
Applying Pediatric Regimens to Younger Adult Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
Lymphoblastic LeukemiaAcuteThe purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety for treating adult ALL patients with the pediatric protocol.