Active clinical trials for "Leukemia"

Evaluate the safety (P-I), pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor effect of immunotherapy of autologous T cells genetically modified to express anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) (TBI-1501) for relapsed or refractory CD19+ B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and efficacy of zilovertamab vedotin given intravenously (IV) across a range of dose levels in participants with previously treated hematological cancers including acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), Burkitt lymphoma (BL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), Richter transformation lymphoma (RTL), and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

This is an open-label, two-part study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of acalabrutinib in Chinese adult subjects with R/R MCL, CLL and other B-cell malignancies. The study is divided into 2 parts: Phase 1 portion and Phase 2 portion.

This is a phase 1b, multi-arm, open-label study of HDM201 in combination with MBG453 or venetoclax in subjects with AML or high-risk MDS. For all subjects, TP53wt status must be characterized by, at a minimum, no mutations noted in exons 5, 6, 7 and 8. Two treatment arms will enroll subjects in parallel to characterize the safety, tolerability, PK, PD and preliminary antitumor activity of HDM201+MBG453 (treatment arm 1) and HDM201+venetoclax (treatment arm 2). In the treatment arm 1, subjects will receive HDM201 in combination with MBG453. In the treatment arm 2, subjects will receive HDM201 in combination with venetoclax. Venetoclax dose will be gradually increased (ramp-up) over a period of 4 to 5 days to achieve the daily target dose tested that will be subsequently continued. Upon the completion of the escalation part, MTD(s) and/or RD(s) of HDM201 in combination with MBG453 or venetoclax in AML and high-risk MDS subjects will be determined for each treatment arm.

Based on the promising results obtained with ibrutinib as single agent, the results obtained with ibrutinib in combination with ofatumumab in a previous phase I/IIb study (Jaglowski 2015), and since data from in vitro studies do not support a synergistic effect of the combination of ibrutinib and anti-CD20 mAbs, we propose a chemotherapy-free combined strategy based on ibrutinib monotherapy as front line treatment for patients with CLL, with the addition of a consolidation phase with ofatumumab in patients not attaining CR under ibrutinib in order to improve the quality of their response. Since median time to CR with ibrutinib was nearly 12 months, patients will be evaluated at this time point, and those patients not in CR will add consolidated treatment with Ofatumumab. Thus, this multi-center, non-randomized phase 2 study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib alone or in combination with Ofatumumab in patients no attaining CR under ibrutinib as front-line therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of pevonedistat when given together with ibrutinib in participants with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has come back or has stopped responding to other treatments. Pevonedistat and ibrutinib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.

This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of blinatumomab when given with nivolumab alone or nivolumab and ipilimumab in treating patients with poor-risk CD19+ precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia that has come back after a period of improvement (relapsed) or has not responded to treatment (refractory). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as blinatumomab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread.

The purpose of this study was to compare relapse-free survival (RFS) between participants with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) / internal tandem duplication (ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) and who were randomized to receive gilteritinib or placebo beginning after completion of induction/consolidation chemotherapy for a two-year period.

CC-90009-AML-001 is a phase 1, open-label, dose escalation and expansion, study in subjects with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia and relapsed or refractory higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

This is a randomized unblinded Phase II clinical trial evaluating the impact of intensive antihypertensive control (targeted to the 50-75th percentile for age, sex, and height) compared to conventional antihypertensive control (targeted to the 90-95th percentile for age, sex, and height) on the incidence of radiographically extensive osteonecrosis in children and young adults receiving treatment for newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL). Primary Objective Compare the frequency of radiographically extensive osteonecrosis in patients receiving intensive compared to conventional antihypertensive therapy. Secondary Objectives Evaluate the efficacy of intensive antihypertensive control compared to conventional antihypertensive control in the prevention of clinically significant (CTCAE Grade 2 or higher) and radiologically extensive osteonecrosis, overall and stratified by joints. Compare the frequency of clinically significant and radiographically extensive osteonecrosis in patients receiving antihypertensive therapy and historical controls. Compare blood pressures achieved in intensive and conventional arms using both pressures obtained as part of routine patient care and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Compare levels of vascular dysfunction as measured physiologically, radiographically, and in blood samples in patients receiving intensive compared to standard antihypertensive therapy. Exploratory Objectives Identify predictive patterns of blood biomarkers which identify patients at high- risk of developing clinically significant osteonecrosis. Identify MRI findings during late induction which correlate with osteonecrosis lesions seen during reinduction. Identify patterns of diurnal blood pressure variation as measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring associated with the later development of osteonecrosis. Compare induction blood pressure control and intervention arm to echocardiographic changes at reinduction II. Evaluate patient-reported, health-related quality of life in patients during induction and after 1.5 years of therapy when many experience the symptoms of osteonecrosis.