Active clinical trials for "Carcinoma, Hepatocellular"

CC-122-HCC-002 is a Phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion clinical study of CC-122 in combination with nivolumab in subjects with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have progressed after or were intolerant to no more than 2 previous systemic therapies for unresectable HCC, or are naïve to systemic therapy.

This open-label study will demonstrate proof-of-mechanism of HIF1A inhibition by a decrease of HIF1A mRNA after intravenous (IV) infusion of RO7070179 in participants with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have failed at least one line of systemic therapy. This will be a single arm study and all participants will receive RO7070179, 13 milligram per kilogram per week (mg/kg/week), 2-hour IV infusion on Days 1 and 4 during Week 1 of Cycle 1, followed by once weekly in 6 week cycle. Treatment with RO7070179 will be continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Radiopaque Microsphere (T-ACE Beads) interventional therapy for patients with liver cancer

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Radiopaque Microsphere (T-ACE Beads with doxorubicin) interventional therapy for patients with liver cancer

To evaluate the safety, efficacy and PK of avelumab in combination with axitinib as first line treatment in patients with advanced HCC

Boosting of tumor cell killing by cytotoxic lymphocytes may be a promising means to enhance anti-tumor immunity. Prior studies demonstrated that tumor infiltration by cytotoxic lymphocytes correlates with control of tumor growth and is associated with an improved prognosis in cancer patients. Trafficking of activated lymphocytes is a tightly regulated mechanism and the specific nature of the chemokine milieu is a crucial determinant for permitting T cell entry into the tumor microenvironment. CXCL10 is an interferon-inducible chemokine particularly important for the recruitment of activated T, and it has been shown to enhance anti-tumor responses through its action on cytotoxic T cells (e.g., glioblastoma, colorectal adenocarcinoma and lung carcinoma). Additionally, roles for CXCL10 as an anti-tumor effector include its ability to chemo-attract NK cells into sites of inflammation, and its ability to inhibit development of new vasculature and induce the regression of newly formed vessels. Adding a layer of complexity, the function of CXCL10 can be regulated by dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPPIV), leading to the formation of a dominant negative, antagonist form of the chemokine. This was initially demonstrated in vitro, and recent work has provided convincing in vivo evidence that antagonist forms of CXCL10 regulate lymphocyte trafficking. The main goal of this protocol is to evaluate the tolerance of sitagliptin treatment in HCC patients, and secondary DPPIV inhibitors as a strategy for protecting CXCL10 chemokine agonist activity as a means to enhance tumor regression.

Donafenib versus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular cancer.

The purpose of this study is to determine recommended Phase 2 dose [RP2D]) and the objective response rate of JNJ-42756493 (erdafitinib) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) participants with fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 19 amplification.

This is a multicenter, open-label, phase I study of rSIFN-co (3 times a week via subcutaneous injection for 21 days, with 1 week of washout per cycle).

This is a pilot single arm study with the primary endpoints of feasibility and preliminary estimates of safety and efficacy. This protocol builds on over 25 years of experience with high dose liver RT (Radiation Therapy), and in particular adaptive RT aimed at adjusting the global radiation dose based on a patient's measured sensitivity to treatment. This current protocol uses functional imaging and specialized radiation planning techniques to spare highly functional portions of the liver to preserve function. The investigators feel this will further improve the safety and efficacy of RT for all patients by customizing treatments to each. If this approach is promising, the investigators will proceed to a phase II randomized study of standard versus spatially and dosimetrically adapted RT.