Active clinical trials for "Carcinoma, Hepatocellular"

This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter Phase Ib study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different doses of IBI310, bevacizumab combined with sintilimab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic HCC who have not previously received systemic therapy, are unsuitable for radical surgical resection or local treatment, or have progressive disease after surgical resection or local treatment.

This study is a single arm, single center, prospective and open exploratory study. About 15 patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation are expected to be enrolled.Patients will be treated with bevacizumab and FOLFOX4.Treatment was continued until disease progression, development of intolerable toxicities, death, withdrawal of consent, initiation of new antitumor therapy, whichever occurred first.

This is a parallel assigned, open-label, perspective trial studying the safety and efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with PD-1 Blockade and Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with Vp3 Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus (PVTT, Japanese Liver Cancer Study Group classification) before liver transplantation.

This clinical trial studies positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) in determining the radiation dose delivered with radioactive spheres to patients with liver metastasis or primary liver or biliary cancer. Comparing results of diagnostic procedures dose before and after delivery of radioactive spheres to the liver may help determine radioembolization dose and plan the best treatment for liver metastasis or primary liver or biliary cancer.

In patients with HCC undergoing therapy 1. We aim to determine the prognostic significance of liver stiffness in patients with HCC 2. We aim to determine the rate and severity of complications of treatment and its association with liver stiffness in patients with HCC

Management of recurrent HCC is urgent and several treatments have been developed .Repeat hepatectomy is considered to be the first choice for recurrent HCC. Unfortunately, repeated open hepatectomy can be performed only in a small proportion of patients due to inadequate liver function reserve, widespread recurrence or high invasiveness. Given that recurrent tumors are usually detected at small size during follow-up after initial surgery, radiofreqency ablation (RFA), which is less invasive, may be locally curative and causes minimal damage to liver function reserve,has been widely used. However, the re-recurrence rate after RFA is more than 50%,and the recurrence-free survival is less than 20%. Recently, satisfactory short- and long-term oncological outcomes have been reported for laparoscopic surgery (LS) for the treatment for primary HCC with cirrhosis. Some single center pilot studies reported that LS may, compared with open surgery, improve the prognosis of HCC with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. LS was initially considered not suitable for recurrent HCC due to postoperative adhesions that might make laparoscopic surgical procedure more difficult and less safe. With improvement in technique and experience, recent studies showed that LS for recurrent HCC in cirrhotic patients is a safe and feasible procedure with good short-term outcomes. However, thus far, no study has been performed to evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes of LS for recurrent HCC, and compare those results to that for RFA. To clarify these issues, a multicenter retrospective comparative study by using propensity score matching method that included a large consecutive series of patients with recurrent HCC within Milan criteria, who underwent LS or RFA, was performed.

Anatomical liver resection was widely accepted as first line curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. However, number of retrospective clinical studies showed no priority of anatomical resection for hepatocellular, compared with non-anatomical resection. Surgical resection margin is a essential factor that may affect tumor prognosis. It is controversial whether adequate liver resection margin is associated with improved survival outcome in patients with hepatocellular. There was few prospective clinical trial to investigate whether anatomical liver resection is superior to non-anatomical resection or liver resection with adequate margin is superior to that with inadequate margin. This prospective clinical trial aims at fix these issues.

The study investigates the adjuvant SBRT following TACE in early and intermediate stages HCC not amenable for surgical resection or orthotopic liver transplant.

The purpose of this study is to refine and pilot test educational material developed to educate and support patients receiving immunotherapy for advanced cancer. The intervention is an educational video and question prompt list (QPL) to promote communication between patients, caregivers, and the oncology team about the risks and benefits of immunotherapy.

Improving communication is foundational to improving patient safety. Electronic health records (EHRs) can improve communication, but also introduce unique vulnerabilities. Failure to follow-up abnormal test results (missed results) is a key preventable factor in diagnosis and treatment delays in the VHA and often involves EHR-based communication breakdowns. Effective methods are needed to detect diagnostic delays and intervene appropriately. Manual techniques to detect care delays, such as spontaneous reporting and random chart reviews, have limited effectiveness, due in part to bias and lack of provider awareness of delays. They are also inefficient and cost-prohibitive when applied to large numbers of patients. Diagnostic errors are considered harder to tackle, in part because they are difficult to measure. Rigorous measurement of diagnostic safety is essential and should be prioritized given the increasing amount of electronically available data. To create an effective measurement and learning program researchers must (1) ensure teams know how to take actionable steps on data and have assistance in doing so and (2) prioritize diagnostic safety at the organizational level by securing commitment from local VA leadership and clinical operations personnel. This will ensure that safety measurement will translate into action. The proposed study focuses on creating a novel program to develop and evaluate multifaceted socio-technical tools and strategies to help prevent, detect, mitigate, and ameliorate breakdowns in EHR-based communication that often lead to "missed" test results in the VHA.