Active clinical trials for "Carcinoma, Hepatocellular"

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) have shown promising outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).In China, Oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil is commonly used in continuous hepatic arterial perfusion chemotherapy.But the 5-FU requiring a long infusion and Calcium folate is also needed to sensitize 5-FU. Moreover, 5-FU regimen was associated with a variety of adverse events, which limited its application in HAIC.Compared to 5-fluorouracil, raltetrexed is less toxic, has a stronger anti-tumor effect and can be administered in just two to three hours. However, the comparison of the two drugs in HAIC to treat advanced HCC has not been reported. In this study, we will evaluate the the progression-free survival(PFS)、objective response rate（ORR）、 disease vacancy rate（DCR）、overall survival (OS) and safety in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Ad-HCC) who are undergoing hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of Raltetrexed plus oxaliplatin (SALOX) compared with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX) treatment by designing prospective, multi-center phase III clinical study.

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of donafenib combined with sintilimab in patients with advanced hepatocellullar carcinoma (HCC).

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TheraSphereTM yttrium [90Y] glass microsphere in the Chinese patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma often die from intrahepatic disease because current treatment options are limited. Local treatment using 166Ho-radioembolization (166Ho-RE) offers a safe and effective treatment. Because 166Ho-microspheres are used as a scout dose for treatment simulaton and for the actual treatment itself, a tailored approach can be used. This concept has proven to be more predictive than the 90Y-radioembolization concept (current standard-of-care), which is a based on a surrogate scout dose (i.e. 99mTc-MAA). A personal treatment plan may be used for 166Ho-radioembolization to optimize efficacy, based on scout dose distribution. However, individualized treatment planning inherently leads to treatment doses that deviate from the currently approved 'one-size-fits-all' approach (i.e. 60 Gy average absorbed dose for all patients). Therefore, safety of individualized 166Ho-RE will be evaluated first to validate safety and confirm safety thresholds. These thresholds will be used in subsequent randomized controlled studies.

This Phase 2a trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of NK cell therapy combined with the hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in patients with intermediate and/or locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We hypothesized that 5-fluorouracil (FU) with immunomodulatory functions would relieve the immunosuppressive microenvironment from the myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), thereby enhancing the anti-tumor activity of NK cells. Thus, the subsequent infusion of autologous NK cells (VAX-NK/HCC) following HAIC treatment may further improve the anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced HCC.

This phase II trial evaluates lenvatinib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that has come back (recurrent) after a liver transplant. HCC is a cancer of the liver and is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. Liver transplantation is a potentially curative treatment option for HCC, however, up to 20% of patients develop recurrent disease after liver transplantation and prognosis remains poor. Lenvatinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Systemic treatments for HCC have not been studied in patients with recurrent HCC after liver transplantation, so there is no established therapy for these patients. This phase II trial evaluates lenvatinib for this purpose.

This is a single-center, phase 1, open label, dose-escalation study of MTL-CEBPA co-administered with atezolizumab and bevacizumab to assess the PK, PD, and potential toxicities of the drug combination in advanced HCC patients, and to determine the MTD, OBD or RP2D. The sample size employed is a minimally modified standard 3+3 cohort model commonly used in Phase I oncology studies. Once determined, the MTD/OBD/RP2D will be administered to an Expansion Cohort (Phase Ib) of 10 additional patients with advanced HCC.

This is an Open-label, Single Arm study to observe the safety and tolerability of B010-A in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

This is a multi-center, randomized, open-label pivotal phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EAL as adjuvant therapy in preventing recurrence in patients with primary HCC at high recurrence risk after radical resection.

This is a Phase III, open-label, multicenter, randomized, two-arm study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus either lenvatinib or sorafenib versus lenvatinib or sorafenib alone in participants with locally advanced or metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) who have progressed on prior systemic treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination.