Active clinical trials for "Liver Diseases"

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of lyophilized Cornus mas L. fruit powder with/without diet therapy on biochemical parameters and anthropometric measurements in patients with metabolic associated fatty liver disease.

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a potentially fatal complication of severe hepatic illness resulting from various causes. In a clinical setting, severe hepatic injury is usually recognized by the appearance of jaundice, encephalopathy and coagulopathy. The term acute liver failure (ALF) is frequently applied as a generic expression to describe patients presenting with or developing an acute episode of liver dysfunction. Cerebral edema is very common in patients with acute liver failure and encephalopathy. Acute liver failure (ALF) has Less common aetiologies include viral hepatitis, drug-induced liver injury, pregnancy-induced liver failure and autoimmune hepatitis. Survival for patients with ALF has steadily improved over the last few decades. Acute liver failure (ALF) is defined as sever acute liver injury with encephalopathy and impairment of synthetic function (INR ˃1.5) in a patient without pre-existing cirrhosis or liver disease. Acute liver failure (ALF) and acute on chronic liver Failure (ACLF) are conditions frequently encountered in the ICU and are associated with high mortality.

The primary purpose of the study is to assess the effect of hepatic impairment on the PK of tavapadon following administration of a single oral dose in participants with mild and moderate hepatic impairment relative to age, body weight, and sex-matched participants with normal hepatic function.

Cirrhosis is the leading cause of death in India and worldwide and leading causes in developed world include alcoholic liver disease, hepatitis C, and more recently, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). As cirrhosis advances, portal hypertension develops, resulting in complications such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal hemorrhage. Ascites is the most common major complication of cirrhosis, occurring in 50-60% of patients within ten years of diagnosis . Development of ascites is an ominous landmark in disease progression as 15% of patients with ascites will die within 1 year, and 44% within 5 years. Less than 10% patients develop refractory ascites and is associated with a poor prognosis with a high mortality, approximately 50% within 6 months and 75% at 1 year with the median survival approximately 6 months . Refractory ascites occurs as a result of splanchnic vasodilatation and maximal activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the renin - aldosterone system (RAAS) . The therapeutic options available for these patients are serial therapeutic paracentesis, liver transplantation and trans jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts .The model for end stage liver disease( MELD) score predicts survival in patients with cirrhosis . However, other factors in patients with cirrhosis and ascites are also associated with poor prognosis, including low mean arterial pressure; low serum sodium, low urine sodium, and high Child-Pugh score . Variceal bleed is the most dreaded complication of cirrhosis and screening endoscopic is recommend in these patients. About 60% of patients with decompensated cirrhosis have varices at the time of diagnosis. Majority of these patients will require non selective beta blockers (NSBB) as standard of care as primary or secondary prophylaxis in prevention of variceal hemorrhage. NSBB reduce portal pressure by decreasing cardiac output and by producing splanchnic vasoconstriction.. Endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVL) is another modality of treatment of esophageal varices and meta-analysis showed EVL to be associated with significantly lower incidence of first variceal hemorrhage without differences in mortality compared to NSBB. NSBB also has shown to improve survival in these patients with nonhemodynamic effects. Some of the patients may progress to end stage liver disease characterized by the development of refractory ascites and other complications. Most of the studies of NSBB comparing to EVL for primary/secondary prevention of variceal hemorrhage included patients of predominantly child A/B cirrhosis with variable number with ascites without any mention of ascites grading and some of trials excluded patient's with refractory ascites. These patients with ascites received diuretics and salt restricted diet as standard of care. However none of these studies mentioned about control of ascites and survival benefit in patients with advanced stage (child B and C) cirrhosis with ascites .In recent years the role of NSBB for prevention of variceal hemorrhage in refractory ascites patients has been questioned because of the deleterious effect on survival.However the use of NSBB in end stage liver disease has shown mixed results and controversial. Therefore this study is being planned to know the effects of NSBB in advanced stage liver disease patients with ascites and varices in preventing variceal hemorrhage ,effect on ascites and survival.

To assess the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of osilodrostat (LCI699) 30 mg in subjects with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment compared with subjects with normal hepatic function.

This study will explore the relationship of different DEB025 doses in combination with RBV to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic (i.e. viral load reduction) and safety profiles in chronic hepatitis C GT 2 and 3 treatment naïve patients.

This is an open-label, parallel-group study to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of IDN-6556 following a single 50 mg oral dose of IDN-6556 in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (defined as Child-Pugh A, B, and C, respectively) and matched healthy volunteers with normal hepatic function.

Investigation the Effects of Different Doses of SAMe in Subjects with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and non-treated matched healthy volunteers as control group

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacodynamic (i.e. hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load), pharmacokinetic and safety profiles between two treatment groups receiving different doses of DEB025 in combination with ribavirin (RBV) during the first 12 weeks treatment in chronic hepatitis C genotype (GT)-2 and GT-3 patients who had previously failed interferon therapy or were intolerant or unable to take interferon.

Study Design 50 patients will be enrolled and randomized into patients (Group IA) and controls (Group I B) Investigations: Hematology CBC, Prothrombin time and INR Peripheral smear, Retics Biochemistry Liver function testing, AFP Kidney function testing Etiology of chronic liver disease Infectious etiology: total antiHBc, anti HCV, HCV RNA, HBV DNA Non infectious etiology: Autoimmune markers, copper studies, iron studies, HOMA IR, FBS Etiology of decompensation Variceal bleed Infection ( blood culture, urine culture, sputum culture, chest xray) Surgery Drugs Alcohol intake Ascitic fluid analysis UGI endoscopy Imaging USG abdomen with Doppler for spleno-portal axis CECT- Triple phase upper abdomen Liver regenerative potential efficacy testing Histology ( by transjugular liver biopsy) Liver Dendritic cells ( CD11c, CD40, CD 54, CD 123, BDCA 2 staining) by flow cytometry CD 34+ cells, CD 45+ cells and CD 133+ cells measurement in hepatic venous blood, peripheral blood and liver biopsy by flow cytometry Markers of proliferation like Ki- 67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in liver biopsy Markers of angiogenesis like VEGF, v WF in hepatic venous blood Measurement of Hepatic venous pressure gradient ( HVPG)