Active clinical trials for "Low Back Pain"

Introduction: patients with chronic back pain as a result of degenerated disc disease, besides pain also present with impaired gait. The purpose of this study is to evaluate both the clinical data using clinical rating scales, such as Oswestry Disability Index Greek version (ODI), Numerical Pain Rating Scale for low back pain and leg pain (NPRS) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire Greek Version, and kinetic and kinematic characteristics during gait analysis in patients with chronic low back pain as a result of the degenerated disc disease (Disc Degenerative Disease), before and after application of manual therapy techniques. Methodology: for the purposes of the study, 75 patients suffering from chronic low back pain were randomly divided into 3 groups of 25 each. Each group received five sessions with the first group receiving manual therapy treatment (spinal mobilisation), the second a sham treatment and the third, classic physiotherapy (stretching exercises, TENS and massage). To evaluate the effectiveness of each treatment, the visual analog pain scale, two questionnaires (Oswestry and Roland Morris) and also an optoelectronic system for recording and analysis of gait (kinetic and kinematic data) were utilized.

This is a phase IV, open-label and single-arm study of patients with non-malignant pain due to osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, low back pain and joint/muscle pain, who were not responding to non-opioid analgesics. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of buprenorphine transdermal patch for pain control among these patients.

Chronic axial low back pain is a public health problem and has a high socioeconomic impact. The dorsal ganglion of the second spinal nerve (GDL2) is a cluster of neuronal bodies responsible for sensory afferent inputs from more than 80% of the lumbar region. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is proven effective to help relieve pain. Thus, the aim of this project is to determine the effect of LLLT on GDL2 when applied to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic axial low back pain. Methodology: 45 patients will be randomized into three groups: laser, radiofrequency and local anesthetic. The patient will be positioned in a prone horizontal position under anesthetic monitoring. The intervertebral foramen between the second and third lumbar vertebrae will be accessed by percutaneous puncture guided by fluoroscopy. In the local anesthetic group, injection of 1 ml lidocaine without vasoconstrictor will be applied in the tubes G20, 150 mm long and 5 mm active tip in contact with the target. In the radiofrequency group, neuromodulation will be held for 300 seconds at 42oC. In the laser group, the laser Photon III® (DCM) will be applied through optic fiber crossing G18 cannulas, during 84 seconds. The pain score will be assessed by visual analog scale. Temperature will be measured and aspirate periganglionic sample, trans-operatively, to study Interleucins-1β and TNF-alpha assessed by ELISA and genetic evaluation trough RNA seek, RNA isolation and ATP quantification. The data will be evaluated for normality and subjected to appropriate statistical analysis, in order to seek representation, as same as the level of significance of the studied samples.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of a adapted exercise program and general exercise recommendations compared with only general exercise recommendations for the management of chronic back pain among the workers of BSH (Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte), a manufacturing company.

Introduction: Low back pain is one of the most common complaints in doctors' offices, and acute low back pain is characterized by episodes of pain with less than three weeks duration. The transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), based on the gate control theory of pain proposed by Melzack and Wall in 1965, has been used as an adjunctive therapy in the control of back pain, being a non-invasive, low cost, safe and easy to apply. No studies were found regarding the effectiveness of TENS in acute low back pain. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of TENS in pain management of patients with acute low back pain. Material and Methods: A randomized clinical trial, double-blinded and placebo-controlled. Patients were selected in the clinics of Federal de University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP) according to the following criteria: acute low back pain, both genders, aged between 18 and 65 years, pain between 4 and 8cm in pain numeric scale (PNS) and who agreed to participate in the study. After signing the informed consent patients were randomly allocated into one of the groups: TENS group (TG) or Placebo Group (PG). In TG was applied conventional TENS with frequency and intensity variation (FIV) effect, frequency of 100 hertz, a pulse width of 60μs and intensity adjusted according to the individual baseline for each patient without causing muscular contraction. The electrodes were arranged in a cross shape in the paravertebral region (levels T12-L1 and L5 - S1). In PG the same procedures were adopted, but did not occur electrical stimulus. Patients were informed that they could or could not feel electric shocks. Treatment consisted of 10 sessions (2x / week / 5 weeks), with each session lasting 30 '. Assessments were made at the following times: T0 (baseline), T1 to T10 (the beginning and end of each session), T11 (after the last session), T30 (30 days after the last session) and T60 (60 days after the last session). Assessment tools: PNS for pain, short-form 36 (SF-36), Roland-Morris, self-assessment of improvement ("Likert" scale) and drug consumption (daily).

This study aims to verify if patients with nerve-related leg pain benefits from neurodynamic treatment over two weeks.

The purpose of this study is to determine if the addition of lumbar manipulation will improve function, decrease pain, and recurrence in adolescents with low back pain. The secondary aim of this study is to determine if a modification of a clinical prediction rule by Flynn will be effective in identifying adolescent patients with low back pain who would benefit from lumbar manipulation.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether pulsatile cupping with a cupping device is effective in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain compared to no cupping or to minimal cupping.

The study was conducted to the following purposes To investigate the effect of lumbar mobilization on muscle activity in postpartum mechanical low back pain. To investigate the effect of lumbar mobilization on pain intensity in postpartum mechanical low back pain patients. To investigate the effect lumbar mobilization on functional disability in postpartum mechanical low back pain patients. To compare between the effects of lumbar mobilization, tactile stimulation (placebo treatment) and traditional treatment in postpartum mechanical low back pain patients.

The main objective of this study is to evaluate in patients with chronic low back pain (lasting for more than 3 months and not postoperative) the effect of an instrumental rehabilitation using the I-Moove ® device compared to a conventional physiotherapy rehabilitation for ambulatory postural stability (mean and standard deviation of excursions from the center of gravity) without visual control, 6 weeks after the start of the rehabilitation protocol. We focus on the relative variation between the values obtained on day 0 versus 6 weeks, via measures performed on a force platform. The results will be stratified into 3 age groups (18-39 years, 40-60 years and over 60 years).