Active clinical trials for "Low Back Pain"

As a leading cause of disability worldwide, chronic low back pain (cLBP) represents a significant medical and socioeconomic problem with estimated health care spending of $87 billion/annually. The efficacy of dorsal column electrical stimulation to inhibit pain was first described over 50 years ago. Since then, several large clinical trials have investigated the therapeutic potential of electrical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and found that over 70% of patients with intractable pain had over 50% pain relief after 1 year of treatment. Thus, SCS is a promising therapeutic intervention that has superior patient outcomes when compared to traditional modalities for the treatment of cLBP. To date, SCS for treatment of cLBP has been delivered via epidural electrodes, requiring neurosurgical implantation. Although, the implantable stimulators have a low rate of adverse events, secondary complications associated with surgical intervention still occur.Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a rapidly developing non invasive neuromodulation technique in the field of spinal cord injury. Its application potentiates lumbosacral spinal cord excitability enabling motor functions, (e.g. independent standing, postural control) in patients with chronic complete motor paralysis. Given that epidural and transcutaneous SCS activate similar neuronal networks, tSCS for cLBP treatment may be advantageous due to its non-invasive nature which may also allow for a mass market production and rapid patient availability if tSCS is proven efficacious. In this pilot study we will establish the feasibility of tSCS to acutely improve patient reported outcomes (pain scores) and several objective measures, including sit-to-stand biomechanics, neurophysiological and neuroimaging outcomes.

This study aims to collect primary data from patients with low back pain to assess the effect of standard osteopathic management and biopsychosocially-informed osteopathic care using a Single-Case Experimental Design.

The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to compare two behavioral interventions for patients who are recovering from lumbar spinal surgery for a degenerative spine condition. The study aims to answer the following questions: Is it feasible and acceptable to deliver the interventions and conduct the study procedures in this patient population? Do the interventions benefit patients with regard to pain-related, functional, opioid use, and psychosocial outcomes at 3 and 6 months after surgery, and does one intervention have more benefit than the other? Participants will be asked to do the following: Complete self-report questionnaires online before spine surgery, and around 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after spine surgery. Complete a sensory pain task before spine surgery, and around 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after spine surgery. Around two weeks after surgery, participants will be randomly assigned by chance to one of two behavioral interventions - Mindfulness or Education. Participants will then be asked to attend 8, weekly sessions with a study treatment coach over telehealth (online with camera and microphone).

Low back pain (LBP) is both the single most common cause of disability and the leading cause of visits when military personnel go to their primary care doctors. Military personnel that deal with LBP can often be placed on limited duty profile. Not surprisingly, the direct and indirect costs of low back and neck pain accounts for approximately $88 billion of health care expenditure. In order to reduce the large financial and personal cost, clinical studies must be designed to treat LBP. This study will provide evidence-based medicine on a new regenerative medicine treatment option that may significantly affect military personnel with LBP. PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma) may offer alternate treatment methods that may help preserve the facet joint structures, and improve pain and function without causing destructive lesions or worsening degenerative joints. This healing process may favor improved participation with rehabilitation therapy and ultimately improve return to duty status. This study will also assess the effectiveness of point of care generated PRP, as a minimally invasive treatment option for treating lumbar facet pain. Specifically, PRP effectiveness will be compared to injecting placebo control when injected into facet joints.

Spinal Cord stimulation (SCS) is a common intervention used in patients who suffer from chronic nerve pain following back surgery. This is known as failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Equally, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) who work with the NHS, recommend suitable medicines and treatments for patients in their guidelines; suggest that SCS can be used in patients who have never had back surgery. The is no outcome data to define that SCS works in patients with neuropathic back pain, therefore this study will provide clinical data to see if this works. SCS delivers mild electrical impulses to the nerves along the spinal cord. This blocks the pain pathway from reaching the brain. This helps manage the pain experienced the lower back. A common side effect of the conventional system is that patients may experience 'pins and needles', tingling, and numbness, known as parathesia at site of stimulation. This can be particularly uncomfortable for patients. However, parathesia can be eliminated by changing certain settings on the stimulator. This could include increasing the frequency of the stimulator known as high frequency (HF). This works by delivering energy to site of stimulation below the parathesia threshold, so minimal or no parathesia is experienced. Only one study has been completed previously using HF frequency on patients with FBSS. The major findings from these studies have found that when compared to conventional SCS (uses a frequency of 40-80 Hz) that HF has provided better pain relief with minimal or no parathesia. Higher frequencies parameters are not completely novel because they have been used in patients who have FBSS. However, settings of 1000Hz which will be used in this study have not been done in patients who suffer from neuropathic pain and have not had any previous spinal surgery. Therefore, the main reason of this study is to investigate the response patients suffering from neuropathic pain and have not had previous spinal surgery, have to 1000Hz (HF) frequency spinal cord stimulation. We will also investigate the effect this setting has on the quality of life of the patients.

Low back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide. The lumbar zygapophyseal joints (z-joints) are estimated to be the source of low back pain between 10% and 40% of the time. Observational studies have shown that lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy (LMBRFN) can be an effective treatment for z-joint low back pain. Nonetheless, other publications such as the Cochrane collaboration systematic review and the "Minimal Interventional Treatments for Participants with Chronic Low Back Pain" or "MINT" randomized controlled trial conclude that LMBRFN is not efficacious. These discrepancies in the literature may be due to differences in patient selection and procedural technique. This study aims to employ patient selection via dual medial branch block resulting in at least 80% relief on both occasions. Using this rather strict enrollment criteria, the aim of the study is to then compare LMBRFN utilizing 16 gauge needles via the "parallel" approach as endorsed by Spine Intervention Society guidelines to LMBRFN performed with 22 gauge needles and another commonly employed "perpendicular" technique similar to that approach used for medial branch blocks. The primary outcome of the study will be to determine if there is a difference in the percentage of patients with lumbar facet pain who achieve moderate or good response (improvement of Numeric Pain Rating Scale of at least 50% or 80%) or in the duration of effect (median duration of moderate or good response in those with positive outcome) between these two groups.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection therapy for low back pain patients. Our hypothesis is that PRP will reduce the pain feeling and benefit for restore of the intervertebral disk.

A Phase 1b study to investigate the efficacy of PP353 compared to placebo in the treatment of chronic low back pain associated with bone oedema.

A clinical trial comparing healing of unilateral or bilateral spondylolysis in children treated with a Boston thoracolumbar orthosis (brace) or with a soft spinal brace (Porostrap lumbar support) for four months. Inclusion criteria will be a child or adolescent aged between 8 and 20 years with an early uni- or bilateral defect (fracture line) in the pars interarticularis in the CT-scan with no signs of bony sclerosis. Additionally, bone marrow edema has to be confirmed in MR images (T2 sagittal) as a sign of an early lesion. Exclusion criteria will be spondylolisthesis on standing spinal radiograph, systemic skeletal disorder or lack of interest. Patient's preference defines the treatment method. Minimum follow-up time will be 2 years for all patients. According to statistical power analysis a total of 60 patients will be needed to provide evidence for the effectiveness or no effectiveness of rigid thoracolumbar orthosis on the natural history of early spondylolysis. Measured outcome parameters are 1) Bony healing on CT-scan, 2) SRS-24-score at the beginning of the treatment and during the 2-year follow-up, 3) Back and lower extremity pain at the beginning of the treatment and during the 2-year follow-up (Pain drawing including VAS-score in children under 16 years old, Oswestry disability index including VAS-score in patients over 16 years old), 4) Thoracolumbar radiographs at 2-year follow-up: Evidence of spondylolisthesis, 5) Trunk strength and spinal mobility at follow-up visits. As part of this study, the investigators will also evaluate patients with spondylolysis treated in their hospitals before this clinical trial begun. In this retrospective study they will evaluate all patients between 8 and 20 years of age with spondylolysis, which have been treated with thoracolumbar orthosis after year 2009 and are not participating in to prospective study. Main focus will be in bony healing in CT-scans after brace treatment.

VETERANS ONLY. Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is common. Most Americans will have at least one episode of low back pain in their lifetimes. Approximately 50% of all US Veterans have chronic pain, and CLBP is the most common type of pain in this population. This study will use a sequential randomized, pragmatic, 2-step comparative effectiveness study design. The main goal is to identify the best approach for treating cLBP using commonly recommended non-surgical and non-pharmacological options. The first step compares continued care and active monitoring (CCAM) to internet-based pain self-management (Pain EASE) and an enhanced physical therapy intervention that combines Pain EASE with tailored exercise and physical activity. Patients who do not have a significant decrease in pain interference (a functional outcome) in Step 1 and those desiring additional treatment will be randomized in Step 2 to yoga, spinal manipulation therapy (SMT), or therapist-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Participants proceeding to randomization in Step 2 will be allowed to exclude up to one of the three Step 2 treatments based on their preferences. The investigators' primary hypothesis for the first treatment step is that an enhanced physical therapy intervention that combines pain self-management education with a tailored exercise program will reduce pain interference greater than internet-based pain self-management alone or CCAM in Veterans with cLBP. The primary outcome is change in pain interference at 3 months, measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference subscale. Study participants will be followed for one year after initiation of their final study treatments to assess the durability of treatment effects. The study plans to randomize 2529 patients across 20 centers.