Active clinical trials for "Low Back Pain"

Low back pain (LBP) is a common condition worldwide as the lifetime prevalence is up to 80%. It is defined as pain in the lumbosacral region in which the etiological causes are most often mechanical, and it is therefore defined as "non-specific LBP". Lumbar belts are used in the treatment and secondary prevention of LBP. They are supposed to reduce the intensity of pain by improving the functional capacities of daily activities and thus preventing the risk of chronicity related to immobility (HAS). Despite some proof of their efficiency in the literature, it is still not clear how the pressure applied by the belt and the immobilization constraints on the trunk improve the patient mobility. Considering that LBP causes movement limitation, and that the lumbar belt contributes to initially decrease the pain intensity, as well as to improve the mobility and the functional capacities of the patient, we propose to evaluate the clinical and biomechanical effects of the lumbar belt during different trunk movements in subjects with and without LBP. This is a clinical investigation on a CE marked medical device, used in accordance with its intended purpose, in the context of a post-marketing clinical follow-up with additional non-invasive procedures (IC SCAC: case 4.1 of the medical device regulation 2017/745).This is a prospective, monocentric, comparative and open clinical investigation. The objective is to evaluate the clinical and functional effects related to spinal movements in 2 conditions, with and without the wearing of a lumbar belt. The study will be carried out with two groups of subjects: one group of subjects presenting an episode of LBP (NS>4) (subjects considered to have subacute or chronic nonspecific LBP according to the classification of LBP) and another group of control subjects with no spinal symptoms and no pain that could limit movement (healthy subjects). Each group will undergo 2 visits on 2 separate days with a 30-day delay for the LBP subjects and a 7-day delay for the healthy subjects a first visit (V1) for inclusion, familiarization with a clinical and functional test, and an external measurement of spinal mobility during movements; a second visit (V2) for a clinical and functional evaluation, external measurements of spinal mobility and biomechanical measurements.

Low back pain is common MSK disease with prevalence of 60 to 70 percent. Patients with low back discomfort are typically treated conservatively by physical therapists. Progressive muscles relaxation technique has been shown in several studies to reduce chronic back pain and increase flexibility. pressure biofeedback therapy works on Intra abdominal pressure.it helps to alleviate compression on lumbar spine and support the adjacent lumbar spine.The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to determine the effectiveness of pressure biofeedback training (Pr.BFB) in combination with progressive muscles relaxation technique (PMR) & progressive muscles relaxation training alone on pain, disability, ROM & endurance of muscles among nonspecific chronic low back pain patients.

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a major cause of chronic low back pain (> 40%). It can be defined by specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, with a strong correlation between pain and the inflammatory aspect of the disc, resulting in active disc disease (AD). The Modic classification based on MRI of the lumbar spine is considered a reference. The management of low back pain in patients with inflammatory disc disease generally involves intra-disc corticosteroid infiltration, which has been widely proven to be effective in reducing pain [4-6]. However, this procedure can be painful and invasive and sometimes impossible to perform due to severe disc impingement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy on pain of para-disc infiltration of corticosteroids in contact with the inflammatory MRI signal abnormality (Modic 1) when it is lateralized. This variant of infiltration is easier to perform (no catheterisation of the disc and therefore quicker), would entail less risk of disc infection and would be accessible to more radiologists. It is already practised but, to our knowledge, has never been the subject of a study to evaluate its effectiveness on pain. If successful, more patients could be treated and the range of treatment could be extended.

Low back pain is a major public health problem. It is the leading cause of disability in the world. The factors that lead to chronicity of low back pain are multi-factorial and are essentially represented by psychosocial factors (catastrophism, kinesiophobia, algophobia job dissatisfaction, emotional problems such as depression, anxiety, stress, injustice, etc.). Pain is a multimodal experience that involves different brain structures that are activated by the pain signal and involve the autonomic nervous system (ANS). The vagus nerve is the main actor of one of the two branches of the ANS, the parasympathetic system, which acts as a "slow-down". The vagus nerve participates in the inter-neuronal transmission of key neurotransmitters for mood, alertness, attention and motivation. Vagal stimulation has been used for many years as an analgesic device in chronic pain (vascular pain (facial vascular pain, fibromyalgia, visceral pain, gastrointestinal and pelvic pain...) To date, no study has been conducted on the value of vagal stimulation in chronic low back pain.

This study will be a prospective, open-label, multi-center study including 72 patients that will collect additional safety and efficacy data for the Spinal Stabilization Technologies PerQdisc Nucleus Replacement System.

We want to check the effects of Mckenzie intervention & Pilates intervention on power looms workers having nonspecific chronic low back pain

There is evidence of three randomized controlled trials that face-to-face CFT reduces disability compared with active interventions for adults with chronic low back pain. The pandemic enabled the popularization of tele rehabilitation around the globe, but there are still no clinical trial testing the effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) via tele rehabilitation for elderly people with chronic low back pain. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of CFT compared with Pilates, both via tele rehabilitation in elderly patients with chronic low back pain.

Many Veterans experience chronic pain, with back pain the most commonly reported condition. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is moving from reliance on medications to an approach in which non-medication interventions, including complementary and integrative health treatments, are now a first line of care. Acupressure, a Traditional Chinese Medicine technique derived from acupuncture, is emerging as a potentially effective approach for treating several chronic pain conditions and could prove beneficial in helping Veterans manage their chronic low back pain. This study will determine the effectiveness of self-administered acupressure to treat chronic low back pain. 300 Veterans will be invited to participate in the study. All participants will be asked to attend an introduction to acupressure class and complete a survey when they join the study and again at 6 weeks and 10 weeks. The survey measures assess important outcomes, such as how pain interferes with daily function, as well as other areas that can be affected by pain such as fatigue and sleep quality. After completing the first survey, half of the participants will receive a tablet computer with an app that shows them how to self-administer acupressure for low back pain and will be asked to do daily acupressure sessions for the next 6 weeks. The other half of the participants will receive the tablet computer with the app approximately 10 weeks after completing the final survey based assessment. The investigators anticipate that outcomes will be improved after 6 weeks of acupressure practice, and these improvements will persist for the following 4 weeks.

Low back pain is a common neuro-musculo-skeletal problem affecting 40% of world's population at some point in their life and causes significant disability with loss of productive working hours. Low back pain is usually non-specific or mechanical and its mechanical origin is identified by the presence or absence of signs and symptoms i-e local or radicular pain, tenderness, spasm associated with different postures or movements. This study aims to compare the therapeutic effects of shockwave therapy and Maitland lumbar mobilizations on pain, disability and range of motion in patients having mechanical low back pain. Current study will be randomized clinical trial in which convenience sampling technique will be used. Sample size will be 26. Subjects with age group of 25 to 45 years and who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be included in this study and they will be randomly allocated into two groups. Group A will be given shockwave therapy treatment, while the group B will be given Maitland lumbar PA glide mobilizations. Each groups will also receive the conventional physical therapy treatment that includes lumbar stretching exercises and core strengthening exercises. Both the therapeutic techniques will be conducted for 4 weeks, two sessions per week for each group. Before, after two weeks and after four weeks of the treatment sessions, effects of treatment will be noted and quantitative data will be analyzed using SPSS software version 25.

Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI) defines sub-acute low back pain as low back pain lasting between 4 and 12 weeks. There is insufficient evidence regarding the comparative effect of muscle energy technique and myofascial mobilization in the management of sub-acute non-specific low back pain with the tightness of quadratus lumborum and erector spinae muscles