Active clinical trials for "Low Back Pain"

The aim of this study is to verify the effectiveness of the association of Shortwave Diathermy and Pilates exercises in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain, on the reduction of pain, functional disability and improvement of the quality of life.

The aim will be to compare a experimental group submitted to a protocol of spinal manipulation and myofascial release; and a control group composed by spinal manipulation only, in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain. This is a randomized controlled trial, characterized by the application of manual therapy, in two modalities: spinal manipulation plus myofascial release and spinal manipulation alone. Participants will be enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: 1) spinal manipulation plus myofascial release, totaling 6 sessions, 2x/week, for 3 weeks; 2) spinal manipulation: 6 sessions, 2x/week, for 3 weeks. Participants will be evaluated in two different moments: 1) Baseline (pre-intervention); 2) at the end of intervention period (3 weeks); and 3) after 3 months follow-up. The primary outcomes will be pain intensity (measured in centimeters with the visual analogue scale - VAS) and disability (measured by the Quebec questionnaire - QDS). The secondary outcomes will be muscle fatigue (measured by the Biering-Sorensen test), postural balance (measured by the Y Balance test), pain threshold (algometry, in kgf) and perception of recovery (Likert scale of 6-points) and health status (measured by the Eq5d3L questionnaire). Data analysis will be performed with the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software version 24.0. Data normality assumptions will be confirmed by the Shapiro Wilk test. If the assumptions were met, a mixed ANOVA with repeated measures will be adopted, based on the outcomes and the independent variables (groups), for the comparison between pre-intervention and post-intervention. Spinal manipulation plus myofascial release is expected to have better effects than spinal manipulation alone, associated with the outcomes of interest.

Chronic low back (CLBP) pain is an important public health and socioeconomic problem worldwide and, despite the volume of research in the area, it remains a difficult condition to treat. The Neuromatrix pain model and new findings on the pain chronification process point to a greater efficacy of treatments that address central and peripheral rather than only peripheral structures. Transcranial direct current (tDCS) stimulation is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that has been presenting recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain. However, when applied alone the magnitude of its effect is small in chronic musculoskeletal conditions such as chronic non-specific back pain. One option that could optimize the analgesic effect of tDCS would be the combination with therapeutic exercises, which play a central role in spinal rehabilitation programs as well as higher levels of evidence. The combination of these treatments (tDCS and exercise) may present an analgesic effect superior to the isolated interventions. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of tDCS combined with therapeutic exercises in people CLBP for pain relief, affective aspect of pain, disability, kinesiophobia and global perception. Sixty patients will be randomized into two distinct groups to receive either tDCS (anodal) + therapeutic exercises or tDCS (sham) + therapeutic exercises for 12 sessions over a four-week period. The primary clinical outcome (pain relief) and secondary outcomes (disability, affective aspect of pain, kinesiophobia, and perception of overall effect) will be collected before treatment and four weeks, three months and six months post randomization. The data will be collected by a blind examiner to the treatment allocation.

Chronic spinal pain (CSP) includes chronic low back and neck pain. CSP is a highly prevalent and severely debilitating disorder characterized by tremendous personal and socioeconomic impact, long-term sick leave, low quality of life and very high socioeconomical costs. The current strategies for treating CSP are not yet optimal in reducing pain and related disability, urging the need for improvement. A possible problem is that the current approaches are often to limited and only address pain. Current treatments for CSP do not address associated complaints like sleeping problems which are however important issues. If present, sleeping problems may contribute to CSP severity and related disability. If left untreated, they represent a barrier for effective CSP management. Up to now, however, sleeping problems are hardly addressed and if so, it is mostly limited to sleeping medication. This is a problem since the efficacy and safety of drug treatment has not been established. Therefore, within the current innovative project we propose examining the added value of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) to the current best physical therapy treatment for CSP. CBT-I includes changing negative thoughts about sleep, sleep hygiene, altering sleeping patterns, and teaching relaxation skills. The objectives of the study are to examine if CBT-I combined with the modern physical therapy approach (education about pain followed by exercise therapy) is more effective than the modern physical therapy approach alone for reducing pain, improving sleep and functionality in CSP patients with sleeping problems. Therefore 120 CSP patients with sleeping problems will be randomly divided over the 2 treatment programs (60 per group) and will be assessed before and after their 14-week therapy program consisting of 18 therapy sessions. Comparisons will be made for pain severity, sleep quality and functionality.

In last decade, the awareness has grown regarding the pain neuroscience education (PNE). In the literature, it has been found that there is strong evidence that the educational strategy of pain neuroscience education (PNE) can have positive effects on pain, disability, catastrophization, and physical performance in chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Nowadays, many physiotherapists integrate the PNE into the treatment of chronic pain. However, the importance of culturally sensitive approaches for the treatment of chronic pain has been proposed depending on the cultural differences of pain beliefs, pain cognitions, pain experiences and pain coping strategies in different ethnic populations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the effects of a culturally sensitive PNE with a standard translated PNE on pain intensity, disability status, pain pressure thresholds and psychosocial factors (conceptualization of pain, pain beliefs, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and illness perception) in Turkish patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). The effects of culturally sensitive PNE format will be compared with the standard translated PNE in a pilot trial. 40 Turkish patients (first generation migrant living around Ghent) with chronic LBP, between the age of 18 and 65 years, will be randomized to the culturally sensitive PNE or standard translated PNE. The content of 2 sessions PNE include the explanation about differences of acute and chronic pain, purpose of acute pain, production of acute pain and chronic pain, and potential sustaining factors for central sensitization, but presented in different ways. They will be subjected to an individual education session and they will receive a home education program. In session 2 (after 1 week), they will come back to ascertain that everything is understood.

The purpose of this study will be to determine the efficacy and the prognostic value of a continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test in an in-hospital setting for selecting patients who would have better long term outcomes for treatment with intrathecal implantable devices. The investigators will compare the primary outcomes [changes in pain intensity score (NRS), patient global impression of change (PGIC)] before and after intrathecal infusion of an admixture of bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml versus normal saline. The study will include 36 patients with intractable chronic low back pain in the setting of lumbar post-laminectomy syndrome or vertebral compression fracture who failed conservative management and are considered candidates for IDDS. Prior to the implant, the patients will undergo an intrathecal prognostic infusion test with an externalized catheter. Baseline NRS pain scores will be assessed and documented on all patients upon admission to the preoperative area. An intrathecal catheter will be placed in the outpatient procedure suite at the appropriate level for target dermatomes. The needle entry point will occur in the upper lumbar spine and catheter tip will be placed in the lower thoracic spine, under local anesthesia with the patient awake and with minimal or no sedation. The intrathecal infusion will be started using an external pump once patient is in the PACU. The research component is to perform the intrathecal test with normal saline (inactive placebo solution) in addition to a test with fentanyl and bupivacaine (active solution). Patients will be randomly assigned to either Group I (continuous infusion of bupivacaine and fentanyl followed by saline) or Group II (continuous infusion of saline followed by bupivacaine and fentanyl). In PACU, patients will be started on an infusion rate of 0.5 ml/hr and titrated to pain relief greater than 50% of baseline or up to 0.8-1.0 ml/hr within 6-8 hrs after start of the infusion. A clinician blinded to the treatment arm will assess NRS and PGIC on the patients after approximately 12 hours. Assessment will include changes in pain intensity score at rest and upon ambulating or performing maneuvers that normally elicit patient's low back pain. A 4-6-hour washout period will be allotted with infusion of preservative-free normal saline at a rate of 0.2 ml/hr, after which the physician will document a return of the NRS to baseline before switching therapies.

Chronic low back pain has been identified as a major problem for seafood and agricultural workers, and is known to affect worker health and productivity. The aims of this study are to: 1) identify modifiable, sector-specific, work and movement solutions with the potential to reduce the burden or severity of chronic lower back pain in clam workers and 2) determine the extent that participants adopt identified solution(s), and the impact on functional difficulty and low back pain.

Prospective, single arm, open label, multi-center study to evaluated the effectiveness of intraosseous basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation using the Intracept System.

As of 2020, 53 million Americans provide unpaid care to an individual with a disability. One commonly performed activity of daily living (ADL) provided by informal caregivers is assisted transfers, which requires moving an individual from one surface to another. Approximately 94% of informal caregivers who assist with ADLs to persons with adult-onset chronic physical disabilities affecting mobility reported musculoskeletal discomfort, with pain and discomfort made worse by performing caregiving activities. Although many informal caregivers assist with transfers, most have never received any formal training in proper manual lifting or mechanical lifting techniques. Improper transfer techniques can be detrimental to not only caregiver health but also to the persons they assist resulting in shoulder injury, bruising and pain from manual lift techniques, hip fractures from falls, and skin tears from shear force that occurs with sliding during transfers. Current standard of care provides limited in-person training of caregivers, as most of the rehabilitation process is client-focused. When training is provided clinicians have no means to objectively evaluate if proper techniques are being performed at discharge or when the caregiver and care recipient return home. For this reason, an outcome measure called the Caregiver Assisted Transfer Technique Instrument (CATT) was developed to provide a quick, objective way to evaluate proper technique of caregivers who provide transfer assistance to individuals with disabilities. The CATT evaluates the caregiver's performance on setup, quality of the task performance, and results. After a formal assessment through stakeholder review involving clinicians, informal caregivers, and individuals with physical disabilities who require transfer assistance, the CATT was expanded to include two versions; one that evaluates manual lift technique (CATT-M) and one that evaluates mechanical lift techniques (CATT-L). However, the CATT must undergo further testing with informal caregivers and the individuals they assist to determine if the CATT is a reliable, valid, and responsive tool for identifying skill deficits in caregivers performing assisted transfers. The purpose of this study is to establish the psychometric properties (reliability, validity, and responsiveness) of the CATT and to evaluate the effects of an individualized training session for participants who have transfer technique deficits as identified by the CATT. The long-term goal of this research is to develop the CATT so that it can be used as an objective indicator of transfer performance as well as guide training and educational interventions for informal caregivers to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal pain and injury associated with assisted transfers.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a pervasive disorder affecting up to one-fifth of adults globally and is the single greatest cause of disability worldwide. Despite the high prevalence and detrimental impact of CLBP, its treatments and mechanisms remain largely unclear. Biomarkers that predict symptom progression in CLBP support precision-based treatments and ultimately aid in reducing suffering. Longitudinal brain-based resting-state neuroimaging of patients with CLBP has revealed neural networks that predict pain chronification and its symptom progression. Although early findings suggest that measurements of brain networks can lead to the development of prognostic biomarkers, the predictive ability of these models is strongest for short-term follow-up. Measurements of different neural systems may provide additional benefits with better predictive power. Emotional and cognitive dysfunction is common in CLBP, occurring at the behavioral and cerebral level, presenting a unique opportunity to detect prognostic brain-based biomarkers. Likewise, improvements in electroencephalogram (EEG) neuroimaging strategies have led to increased spatial resolution, enabling researchers to overcome the limitations of classically used neuroimaging modalities (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and functional MRI), such as high cost and limited accessibility. Using longitudinal EEG, this patient-oriented research project will provide a comprehensive neural picture of emotional, cognitive, and resting-state networks in patients with CLBP, which will aid in predicting symptom progression in CLBP. Through this award, the investigators will use modern EEG source analysis strategies to track biomarkers at baseline and 3- and 6-month follow-ups and their covariance with markers for pain and emotional and cognitive dysfunction. In Aim 1, the investigators will identify and characterize differences in resting-state, emotional, and cognitive networks between patients with CLPB and age/sex-matched controls. In Aim 2, the investigators will identify within-subject changes across time and their relationship with clinical symptoms. In Aim 3, as an exploratory aim, the investigators will apply machine- and deep-learning strategies to detect a comprehensive signature of CLBP using EEG features from resting-state, emotional, and cognitive networks.