Active clinical trials for "Low Back Pain"

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain is an important health condition with great consequences from the socioeconomic point of view and is associated with high costs for the health system, absenteeism at work and reduced functional performance. It is considered one of the most relevant health problems in the elderly, with point prevalence estimates higher than for other musculoskeletal conditions. It can be defined as any pain between the last ribs and the lower gluteal folds, with or without pain in the lower limbs, manifesting itself acutely, subacutely or chronically. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of the Pilates method versus segmental stabilization in elderly people with chronic low back pain. METHOD: 60 elderly people with chronic low back pain will participate in the study and will be randomized into two groups: Pilates Group (GP) and Segmental Stabilization Group (SG). The two treatments will have 16 individual sessions, twice a week. Pain will be assessed using the visual analogue pain scale; functional disability, using the Oswestry disability index; excessive fear of movement and physical activity, by the Tampa scale of kinesiophobia; level of confidence in the balance for specific activities, by the ABC scale and; activation of the transversus abdominis muscle by pressure biofeedback. Individuals will be evaluated in four moments: before the first session, after the last session, three and six months after the end of the treatment to verify the effects in the medium term. Patient allocation and assessments will be performed by a blind examiner. Data will be analyzed using the ANOVA procedure and Tukey's Multiple Comparison test. The significance level will be 5%. A hipótese deste estudo é que o grupo que realiza exercícios de Pilates obtém ganhos mais obtem que o grupo que realiza exercícios de estabilização segmentar em todas as variáveis ao final do tratamento.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common reason for which patients are treated with opioids. Because the misuse of prescription opioids has become a serious problem in the Uinted States, finding effective alternative non-pharmaceutical interventions for chronic pain management has become an urgent matter. A phenomenon termed central sensitization (i.e. mal-adaption of the brain) has been hypothesized to be an underlying mechanism for the development of chronic pain, leading to sensory hypersensitivity to extremal stimuli. Therefore, non-invasive brain stimulation, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may be an effective intervention to regulate brain excitability, thus reducing chronic pain. However, research has shown inconclusive evidence regarding the rTMS effects on chronic pain reduction, partly due to the heterogeneity of participants in studies to date. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study is to investigate the immediate and short-term effects of rTMS on neurosensory changes (i.e., pain thresholds) in patients with CLBP. The secondary purpuse of the study is to explore the relationship between changes of cortical excitability (TMS parameters) and changes of pain thresholds after the rTMS intervention in patients with CLBP.

Background: Low back pain, mainly nonspecific (NSLBP) is a major cause of pain and disability worldwide. Exercise therapy (ET) is considered as the first line treatment, and it is one of the treatment modalities most commonly used by physiotherapists. Yet, ET is reliant on the adherence of patients to its various components. Research has demonstrated a positive relationship between adherence to rehabilitation programs and recovery from a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. Therefore, factors that strengthen adherence to ET may increase its efficacy for NSLBP. Converging evidence from recent studies suggest that control and choice may increase adherence to various treatments. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of patient choice and preference on adherence and efficacy of exercise for recovery from NSLBP. Design: Matched case control study. Participants: Fifty subjects with chronic (>3 months) NSLBP. Twenty-five participants will be allocated to exercise by preference group, and 25 aged and gender controls will be allocated to exercise group. Inclusion criteria: Non-specific low back pain (pain or discomfort in the lumbosacral area, with or without symptoms to the lower extremities), diagnosed by general physician or orthopedic surgeon. Age 18-35 Chronic pain (greater than 3 months' duration). Exclusion Criteria: Specific cause for LBP (rheumatic diseases, tumors, fractures, fibromyalgia, previous spinal surgery, pregnancy, low back pain after car or work accidents). Previous (last three years) ET treatment for NSLBP. Regularly performing exercise more than WHO's recommendation: 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity throughout the week or at least 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity throughout the week or an equivalent combination of moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity. Muscle-strengthening activities should be done involving major muscle groups on 2 or more days a week. Procedure: After initial assessment, participants in the intervention group will be asked to choose 3-4 items from a list of 10 general exercises - intended for treatment of low back pain. Each matched participant in the control group will receive the same exercise (without the option to choose). Participants will be instructed to perform their exercises three times a week, for a period of four weeks (12 sessions total). Outcomes: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Henry-Eckert Performance Assessment Tool (HEPA) Both measurements will be taken on the first and last meeting. Additionally, each participant will fill a personal weekly exercise log (selecting between complete \ incomplete \ lack of execution) - sent by e-mail.

This study is to determine the effectiveness of Neural mobilization(NM) technique compared with lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) and Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) in the physical therapy management of chronic low back pain (CLBP) with radiculopathy. Subjects will be randomly assigned into two groups. Group A (NM, LSE and rESWT) and Group B (LSE and rESWT).

Lumbar vertebra surgery is one of the most common surgical procedures. After lumbar veretebra surgery, patients complain of excessive pain. Postoperative pain usually occurs in the early postoperative period and delays patient mobilization and thus lengthens hospital stay. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of erector spina plan(ESP) block and thoraco lumbar interfacial(TLIP) block on postoperative pain in patients with spinal surgery.

A double blinded randomized controlled study comparing pre-procedural IV Paracetamol versus IV placebo (normal saline). The patients will be randomized to either receiving IV paracetamol or saline infusions before undergoing radiofrequency lesioning of two levels of medial branch nerves of the lumbar facets. The primary outcome will be potential differences in pain control. The secondary outcomes will be changes in quality of life (QoL) and activities of daily living (ADLs). We will also be comparing potential differences in the amounts of post-procedure pain medications taken by the patients in each wing of the study

This trial is designed to preliminary evaluate the efficacy and safety of NIBS system for treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP) (over 6 months). The trial is of a double blind sham controlled partial crossover design and will involve 2 weekly treatments and evaluations for 6 weeks, with 6 weeks follow-up. The goal of the study is to 1. Asses the CLBP change immediate and long term effect for the trial duration and follow-up. 2. Asses quality of life improvement as measure by sleep quality and questioners. 3. Asses long term neuronal changes or lack thereof in treated and untreated subjects.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of the capacitive diathermy in the mechanosensitivity, morphological, functional and contractility changes in patients with lumbopelvic pain. Design: A pilot study, single blind, randomized controlled clinical trial, approved previously by The Princess University Hospital Ethics Committee (Feb 11, 2016) and the European University clinical intervention review board (CIPI/054/15). Setting: Faculty of Health Sciences, Exercise and Sport. European University of Madrid. Patients and intervention: A sample of 20 patients with bilateral lumbopelvic pain, between 18 and 60 years old, will be recruited and randomized into 2 intervention groups. The instrumental manual therapy with the switched on capacitive diathermy electrode (IMT+ T-CaRe®on; n = 10) and the instrumental manual therapy with the switched off capacitive diathermy electrode (IMT+ T-CaRe®off; n = 10) will be bilaterally treated for 4 weeks (1 treatment per week during 10 minutes) in the lumbopelvic region. Outcome measurements: Control variables such as the age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, Borg scale physical activity and distress respiratory test will be measured at the beginning of the treatment. Dependent variables such as the pain intensity, the pressure pain threshold, the contractility, the stiffness, the adverse effects, the Oswestry and Schöber test, as well as the ultrasound imaging cross sectional area and thickness of the skin, subcutaneous tissue, connective tissue, L4 multifidus and the abdominal Wall (rectus anterior, externus oblique, internal oblique and transversus abdominis) will be assessed before and after each intervention by a blinded examiner. Analysis data: The statistical analysis will be performed with a 95% confidence interval and the Statistic Package Social Sciences (SPSS) 22.0.

The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to describe the effect of two osteopathic techniques - "high velocity, low amplitude" (HVLA) and muscle energy (ME) - on thickness, activation, strength, pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the paravertebral muscles at the lumbar spine, as well as the peak plantar pressures immediately and after a two-day follow-up. The muscle thickness of the paravertebral muscles at the lumbar spine, namely internal oblique, external oblique and transversus abdominis can be altered after the application of 'high-velocity low-amplitude'(HVLA)and 'muscle energy' (ME)techniques immediately and after a two-day follow-up.

This protocol is a prospective, open label, pilot study examining the utility of three established pain questionnaires (the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire and two novel pain scale devised by the PI) as well as their relationship to three novel quantitative tools to measure the effect of botulinum toxin injections for neck pain and back pain. The three novel methods for measuring neurotoxin effect are: muscle twitch patterns using surface electromyography (sEMG), cervical and lumbar range of motion using a neck and low back inclinometer, and skin surface temperature readings using an infrared imaging camera.