Active clinical trials for "Low Back Pain"

Low back pain (LBP) is currently the most common cause of functional impairment with regard to the musculoskeletal system1. LBP occurs in men and women in all age groups and has a peak incidence between 30 and 65 years. Although 10% of the persons with LRP can be diagnosed with a specific underlying pathology (e.g., disc herniation, canal stenosis, spondylolysis, ...), 90% have symptoms with an unclear origin. 23% of the latter group will eventually develop chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP)2. Exercise therapy is seen as an important component in the rehabilitation of persons with CNSPLBP3. Because previous research showed reduced muscle strength of the back muscles4, exercise therapy that improves / recovers muscle strength is being investigated. However, there is still a lack of clarity concerning the effect that reduced muscle strength has on the development and further development of back pain5-6. The objective testing of back muscle strength remains a recurring issue. Up to now, back muscle strength has been mainly tested by a battery of clinical tests (eg Sorensen test) or the use of "iso machines"7. These Iso machines contain a dynamometer that can very specifically reflect the isometric or isokinetic force on an axis of rotation. Different types of these iso machines (eg Cybex, Biodex) have already been developed, each with specific designs (eg differences in the hip angle, differences in the stabilization of the participant). However, to date no standardized protocols are available for evaluating both abdominal and back muscle strength. Furthermore, it is also essential that before such systems can be used in clinical intervention studies, the reliability of such systems is investigated and that reference data from healthy subjects are collected with which data from patients can be compared. The aim of the current research is therefore to investigate the intra- and inter-operator reliability of a standardized protocol drawn up according to the latest scientific evidence. A second goal is to set standard values for healthy persons for the developed protocol using the Biodex 3 dynamometer system.

Low back pain is an extremely common health problem that most people suffers at any point in their life. Low back pain is the leading cause of activity limitation and work absence throughout much of the world and it causes some economic problems for just not only individuals but also governments. ) The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of different physical therapy techniques on pain, function and core stability in patients with low back pain.

The aims of this study are to examine the effectiveness of functional range conditioning in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain in terms of improving hip internal rotation and strength of the hip abductors, and reducing pain and disability.

Introduction: In TCM, Pulse Diagnosis has been one of the key diagnostic components in the clinical examinations. Traditionally, the palpation of the pulse on the radial artery is subjective among the physicians. With the development of the various devices to study the radial pressure pulse wave (RPPW), these have provided a scientific and objective assessment to assist the physicians on diagnosis and treatment. The primary objective of this intervention study is to investigate the effects of Acupuncture on the RPPW at cunkou in Low Back Pain (LBP) through the pulse sphygmograph. The secondary objective is to investigate the effect of acupoint combinations on different type LBP based on TCM syndrome differentiation through the primary and secondary outcome evaluations. Methods: A single group, pre-post intervention study in which all participants receiving the same intervention will be conducted. A total 80 participants that meet all the following criteria will be enrolled: a. at least 20 years of age of either gender; b. chief complaint being low back pain; c. diagnosis with Lumbago (ICD-9-CM 724.2) or low back pain: loin pain, low back strain and lumbago NOS (not otherwise specified) (ICD-10-CM M54.4); d. diagnosis with lumbago with sciatica (ICD-10-CM M54.5). All participants will undergo acupuncture at BI23, BI25 & Bl40 after obtaining written informed consent. Objective and subjective baseline assessments and outcome evaluations including Vital Signs, health status questionnaire, Constitution in Chinese Medicines Questionnaire (CCMQ), Oswestry Disability Index, Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) will be performed. The primary outcome will be the assessment of RPPW at cunkou ie at Cun, Guan & Chi of both hands using Pulse Sphygmograph before and after the intervention. The secondary outcome involves evaluating low back pain using the Fingertips-to-floor test & FPS-R before and after the intervention. Expected Outcome: The results will be analyzed and provide information which can serve as clinical evidence of the influence of acupuncture on the RPPW at cunkou. In addition, the effectiveness of the acupoint combinations on the different type of LBP based on TCM syndrome differentiation can be further investigated.

The main objective of this study is to evaluate in patients with chronic low back pain (lasting for more than 3 months and not postoperative) the effect of an instrumental rehabilitation using the I-Moove ® device compared to a conventional physiotherapy rehabilitation for ambulatory postural stability (mean and standard deviation of excursions from the center of gravity) without visual control, 6 weeks after the start of the rehabilitation protocol. We focus on the relative variation between the values obtained on day 0 versus 6 weeks, via measures performed on a force platform. The results will be stratified into 3 age groups (18-39 years, 40-60 years and over 60 years).

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a new primary care intervention "Back on Track" as compared to usual primary care in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain in which disability levels are moderate and the role of psychosocial factors to this disability is at maximum low (classified as WPN2).

Chronic lower back pain (CLBP) is a significant health care issue in the United States and the world. CLBP contributes to decreased quality of life, decreased function and increased utilization of health care resources. The causes of CLBP tend to be multi-factorial. Arthropathy of the lumbar facet joints is thought to be a common etiology (15-45%). Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) of the medial branch nerve of the facet joint is a well-established treatment modality used to decrease facet joint pains. However, a wide range of temperature is being used (70-90 degrees Celsius). In addition, the optimal temperature that provides the best patient outcomes with the least side effects is not well established in the pain management literature. This study will determine if lumbar facets medial branches RFA at 90 degrees Celsius provides more overall pain relief (i.e., percent of improvement), when compared to ablation at 80 degrees Celsius with no additional adverse events. Furthermore, ablation of the lumbar facets nerve supply at 90 degrees Celsius will provide better improvement in the functionality level, general mood and quality of life as measured by VAS ( Visual Analog Scale) pain score, Pain Disability Index (PDI), McGill Pain questioner scores and Beck Inventory (BI) scores as those receiving the ablation at 80 degrees Celsius. Also, it is associated with less opioid consumption, no additional unwanted adverse events and/or complications along with less need to repeat RFA procedure over one year period.

Introduction: patients with chronic back pain as a result of degenerated disc disease, besides pain also present with impaired gait. The purpose of this study is to evaluate both the clinical data using clinical rating scales, such as Oswestry Disability Index Greek version (ODI), Numerical Pain Rating Scale for low back pain and leg pain (NPRS) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire Greek Version, and kinetic and kinematic characteristics during gait analysis in patients with chronic low back pain as a result of the degenerated disc disease (Disc Degenerative Disease), before and after application of manual therapy techniques. Methodology: for the purposes of the study, 75 patients suffering from chronic low back pain were randomly divided into 3 groups of 25 each. Each group received five sessions with the first group receiving manual therapy treatment (spinal mobilisation), the second a sham treatment and the third, classic physiotherapy (stretching exercises, TENS and massage). To evaluate the effectiveness of each treatment, the visual analog pain scale, two questionnaires (Oswestry and Roland Morris) and also an optoelectronic system for recording and analysis of gait (kinetic and kinematic data) were utilized.

This study aims to evaluate the whether receiving physiotherapy early after onset of the problem is better than waiting a few weeks to see if it gets better before starting physiotherapy. 80 people with sciatica will take part in the study, half of which will receive physiotherapy 2 weeks after seeing their G.P. The other half will receive physiotherapy at the usual time, around 6 weeks after seeing their G.P.

Background Studies in the United Kingdom find the stratified care model of the STarT Back Tool (SBT) to be superior to usual care in primary care low back pain (LBP) patients. However, considerations on differences in health care and social systems across countries are required before taking steps towards any recommendations of implementing stratified care into other health care services. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the stratified care model of the SBT, when embedded into the regional disease management programs on LBP in primary care as compared to current best practice care.