Active clinical trials for "Acute Lung Injury"

The objective of this study is to analyze by trans-oesophageal echocardiography the effect on the right ventricle of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) level variations with constant plate pressure among patients with syndrome of acute respiratory distress of the adult (SDRA). The assumption tested is that a high level of PEP increases the impedance with the ejection of the right ventricle independently of the level of plate pressure. The effect on the right ventricular preload will be checked via the analysis of the respiratory variability of the diameter of the higher vena cava.

This study will test the hypothesis that administration of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) will improve the clinical course and outcome by shortening the duration of mechanical ventilation for these patients.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of etanercept, and define the toxicity, when administered to patients with acute non-infectious lung injury (idiopathic pneumonia syndrome, IPS) and with subacute pulmonary dysfunction after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

The present study will utilize esophageal manometry to measure the presence and magnitude of persistent patient effort during lung protective ventilation, allowing identification and mitigation of occult lung stress.

This Phase 2 study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of inhaled TD-0903 compared with a matching placebo in combination with standard of care (SOC) in hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 associated acute lung injury and impaired oxygenation.

To evaluate the proportion of subjects alive and free of respiratory failure (e.g. need for non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, high flow oxygen, or ECMO) and free of the need for continued renal replacement therapy (RRT) on Day 28. The need for continued RRT at Day 28 will be defined as either dialysis in the past 3 days (Day 26, 27, or 28) or an eGFR on Day 28 <10 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Treatment of patients with Hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is complex. Therapies that have been shown to save the lives of patients with HRF and ARDS are available but they are not always provided. To reduce practice variation and improve adherence to evidence-informed therapies, the investigators developed the Treatment of Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (HRF) and ARDS with Protection, Paralysis, and Proning (TheraPPP) Pathway. The purpose of this pilot study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of the TheraPPP Pathway. To assess feasibility, the investigators will test the ability to measure adherence to the pathway as well as patient and economic outcomes. To assess perceptions about the acceptability of the TheraPPP Pathway, the investigators will conduct a survey to clinicians who used the Pathway.

Novel Corona Virus (SARS-CoV-2) is known to cause Respiratory Failure, which is the hallmark of Acute COVID-19, as defined by the new NIH/FDA classification. Approximately 50% of those who develop Critical COVID-19 die, despite intensive care and mechanical ventilation. Patients with Critical COVID-19 and respiratory failure, currently treated with high flow nasal oxygen, non-invasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation will be treated with ZYESAMI (aviptadil), a synthetic form of Human Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide (VIP) plus maximal intensive care vs. placebo + maximal intensive care. Patients will be randomized to intravenous Aviptadil will receive escalating doses from 50 -150 pmol/kg/hr over 12 hours.

The study to evaluate the effect of cyclosporine ( IL2 inhibitor and antiviral) verse standard care treatment on decrease ADRS, hyper inflammation, hypercytokinemia, and the mortality rate

COVID-19 is a disease that has multiple facets including an inflammatory storm, it promotes blood clotting and causes kidney damage, mucinous secretions in the lung are of great importance to outcome. Increasingly sticky sputum is associated with critical illness, with considerably raised levels of a specific type of mucous protein (MUC5AC) in sputum in COVID-19 patients. There is a strong link between viral infection and mucus production via multiple inter-cellular signalling pathways including Interleukin (IL)6, IL10 and Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) whereby the inflammatory storm causes sudden secretion of high volumes of dense mucus. An Australian pharmaceutical company has developed BromAc (Bromelain & Acetylcysteine) for the palliative treatment of highly mucinous tumors of the appendix and lung. During pre-clinical development, they found that BromAc® rapidly dissolved and removed tumour mucin, making it a potent mucolytic. In combination, bromelain and acetylcysteine disrupt the architecture of the SARS-COV-2 virus in a way that renders it non-infective, reduced cytokines and chemokines in COVID-19 sputum and is a highly effective respiratory mucolytic. The aim of this study is to assess whether BromAc delivered into the respiratory tract as a nebulised aerosol is tolerated and safe at three specific concentrations in healthy volunteer participants. The investigators will further assess the safety of nebulised BromAc and efficacy of the drug product as a mucolytic and anti-inflammatory, and whether this improves clinical outcome in participants with COVID-19. The hypothesis is that BromAc will be tolerated by patients and will result in mucus clearance, improving oxygenation and compliance in those that are ventilated. This is a phase I study on the safety of BromAc, where 12 healthy volunteers will receive BromAc as a nebulised aerosol into the respiratory tract. BromAc is a product that combines two existing products to be delivered into the respiratory tract via nebulised aerosol delivery through a mask. The participant will be assessed for symptoms and side effects. The participant will receive nebulised BromAc at the allocated dose level for a total of 3 days. The hypothesis is that nebulised airway delivery of BromAc will be safe at the concentrations assessed.